Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[ShapurII]

Bombing railways is quite stupid and waste of precious munitions. Railways are cheap and quick to repair.

Some of these railways are in fact railway bridges. Not so quick to repair.

 

[BigMela2onin]

United States, China, India, and Russia will never use nuclear weapons. These countries maintain a no-first-use stance simply because their conventional military capabilities are strong enough to protect their interests both within and beyond their borders.

Moreover, using nuclear weapons would defeat the very purpose of conflict—how can a country capture, control, or exploit resources if it has already destroyed them through nuclear strikes?

In fact, even if Iran possessed nuclear weapons, it is unlikely that it would use them in response to a conventional war, given the catastrophic consequences and limited strategic value of such a decision.

Afaik US does have first use policy

 

[Blain2]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Members of Congress in both US parties are sold out to the Zionists. They are quietly letting this pan out thus no serious opposition to Trump's bullying rhetoric (I do not think the nuclear strikes are on the table), however I just heard on Al-Jazeera that Israeli PM and government are pushing the US to consider the nuclear option because their calculations do not pander to whatever happens to Iran/Iranian people. They are looking at is as an existential war for Israel.

That aside, what is stupidly insane and hilarious in an obscene way, is that the fundamentals of the NPT treaty, which Iran has signed, are that any country that becomes its signatory is automatically guaranteed protection from a nuclear state - this is guaranteed by the P5 on the Security Council. The threats to Iran fly in the face of the entire NPT regime because the ones threatening not only include a P5 state, but also two established nuclear powers threatening a non-nuclear state.

What does it mean for NPT? It essentially means the NPT is finished. The race to nuclear weapons will accelerate in the coming years.

 

[Bengal71]

Some of these railways are in fact railway bridges. Not so quick to repair.

yeah, those will take time. Rail tracks on the ground are cheap and quick to repair.

 

[Tabmachine]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

"Every american"...... sounds like bait

 

[omegalamba7xl9]

Mossad AGENT'S still exists in Iranian's establishment and continue to sabotage any negotiations....why would they want to negotiate if ISRAEL'S target is continuing the War.... So now the situation have turned opposite anyone chanting for war to continue in Iran should be watched very closely.....
I could be wrong in understanding the true feelings of IRANIAN people but it just doesn't make sense especially striking Saudi's??

 

[KingQamaR]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

The US military should be putting boots on the ground in DC.

 

[SD 10]

So looks like invasion coming tonight ?

 

[ShapurII]

Afaik US does have first use policy

Dude, that's an Indian. You should consider average Indian IQ before taking his/her post seriously.

He/she says India is so powerful conventionally that they do not need nuclear weapons.
He/she says using nukes will make the aggressor unable to exploit the resources of the victim.

Typical stupid stuff that your average Indian writes on the internet.

 

[EugeneP]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

But he said energy sector will be his focus. Why sudden fascination with rail?

 

[mangekyo]

United States, China, India, and Russia will never use nuclear weapons. These countries maintain a no-first-use stance simply because their conventional military capabilities are strong enough to protect their interests both within and beyond their borders.

Moreover, using nuclear weapons would defeat the very purpose of conflict—how can a country capture, control, or exploit resources if it has already destroyed them through nuclear strikes?

In fact, even if Iran possessed nuclear weapons, it is unlikely that it would use them in response to a conventional war, given the catastrophic consequences and limited strategic value of such a decision.

I have to disagree with your GPT. The only country that has used nukes against another country is the US. Statistically speaking, they are most likely to use it. The country that has shown itself to be most genocidal in modern times is Israel by far.

Strictly speaking, a country who has demonstrated its willingness to use nukes is giving unconditional support to a genocidal entity with nukes.

 

[ShapurII]

But he said energy sector will be his focus. Why sudden fascination with rail?

Stop large troop movements. Iran doesn't have an air force, now it won't have a railway system either.

 

[KingQamaR]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Serving Generals should refuse illegal orders.

 

[Tabmachine]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

The next tweet is way crazier:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Immortals]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies