Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[omegalamba7xl9]

Is that too much escort?lol I can picture something like this..

 

[ghazi52]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[ghazi52]

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Ibbi32]

Lots of videos of c-17s arriving at nur khan. Interestingly a uae c-130 there as well

 

[东风夜放花千树]

From 10 points on the list, it looks like Iran is demanding US to surrender. Does anyone think Trump will accept that ?

No. If Trump accepts these ten peace terms, it would be an acknowledgment of defeat. That cannot deceive the Republican voter base. We must not forget that the Republicans have to face the midterm elections.

Let's look at the domestic propaganda in the United States.

On April 8 local time, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt dismissed media claims that U.S. President Trump had agreed to the ten ceasefire terms proposed by Iran.

At a press conference that day, Leavitt stated that the ten ceasefire terms published by Iran were completely different from the version ultimately agreed upon by Trump and his team. She clarified, 'The ten ceasefire terms initially proposed by Iran were completely unreliable and have been thoroughly rejected. President Trump and his negotiating team literally threw them into the trash.'


On April 8 local time, according to The New York Times, U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Dan Kane stated that the U.S. military would continue to be stationed in the Middle East, 'and if ordered or called upon, we will resume combat operations with the same speed and precision demonstrated over the past 38 days.'

The report pointed out that President Trump knows that even if the U.S. and Iran fail to resolve issues after the two-week ceasefire expires, 'the political risk of restarting hostilities remains very high.'

 

[maverick]

I don't think so at all. No one is going to touch this war of choice, esp after the Greenland theatrics (which are still in play btw ). Lets see what happens.

NATO will not do anything without legal cover, and the UN vote recently was vetoed that "could" have given NATO legal cover to "try" and open the straits.

I beg to differ, the global "united" banker association will leave Europe dry and go for other pastures.

You are missing the point, wars brings money to banks and banks unfortunately believe it or not, support Zionist movement. EU will be a cannon fodder or you can forget your way of life. This is the unfortunate truth, the sooner EU accepts it better it is to continue its way of life.

 

[r3alist]

Iran and the U.S. have different understandings of what was agreed

This is due to Iranian refusal to negotiate directly with the U.S. and Trump being a compulsive liar

In future, such statements must be documented and agreed in writing

The important part about the ceasefire announcement was not a premature celebration of coming to an end.

Very far from it


It creates a terms of reference on the distance and deception between Iran and USA and Israel.

That was the breakthrough no matter how dismissive some people are.

I just hope people can get realistic about how difficult this is to find any momentary common ground when things are just so apocalyptic sounding right now.

Pakistan or anyone who wants to get involved in resolving this has to somehow work between the USA, and Iran, continue to maintain trust and good offices, whilst protecting its own national interests, as if that's easy

If the net result is Israel is a force on to itself, the Americans effectively cede authority to Israel to do what they want, then god help everyone.

@ShapurII @Immortals

 

[Himalayan]

we need an EMDA(Eastern Military Defence Alliance) a counter to NATO filled with china Russia and islamic nations oif we want to have a chance to defeat these terror*sts

True, but there should be principal regional victors first to formalize VETO type Big threes or Big fives ...

 

[Taimoor]

Here is the thing, when Israel is clearly not adhering to the ceasefire, Iran should declare that yeah we will negotiate with America and we will continue our war with Israel, and American should not get involved in any capacity while Iran and Israel slog it out.

 

[ghazi52]

 

[I*R*A]

Besides the premise... once a nuke has been built, fielded and used... the onus has to be on it's deterrent value and not the destruction it causes... the genie is out of the bottle already.
And all you're doing is exposing yourself to it's consequences but not the reciprocal value it's endows the wielder. Which is why I strongly(dotards word) believe that a country with significant population and resources in a dog eat dog world ushered in by European colonial enterprises... as an instrument of destruction, not only of your civilization but to drain you off your resources!... should have nukes.
The US and zionist examples are the two still unfolding ones on the stage... both with impunity, sabotage, blackmail, non adherence to any conventions... nuclear or international law... impunity and recklessness, disregard for human life.

One must be really shielded or in a bubble to assume the bright side of real world consequences. Something that the west rewarded Iran in response to it's dithering... It cannot go without saying for the umpteenth time "THEY STARTED THIS WAR BY MURDERING THE ONE PERSON WHO STOPPED IRAN FROM GOING NUCLEAR!" make that make sense.
That you cannot make this judgement for your people ... unless you wish to become a victim of it... in this case Iran did. That puny little rats tail needs to be pounded till it mimics the pavement. Literally hundreds of thousands if not millions have paid the price for those who dithered on the very basic premise, safety of whom they were endowed to secure... it seems it is Baghdad all over for Muslims every few centuries... Mongols or mongrels! Just coming in and undoing those sleeping at the helm... the cushy life under the sun very easily becomes the new elixir, when devoid of any other... in hot burning sun of the desert and mirages all around.

So, back to the nuclear! Yes back to it and every thing out there in the toolkit for there just cannot be a repeat. Send polak packing!

Okay lets assume Iranians had a nuclear weapon tested and ready, may be this war could have been avoided (this has proven wrong in Pakistan vs india case, the conflict can still exist in some form and shape without escalation to dooms day scenario). But how would the region including Pakistan react to that presence? 2nd Islamic bomb? Or just a Persian bomb? It will certainly be perceived as a threat to the immediate region, given a chance Iranians would act like bullies (they did fire missiles at nuclear Pakistan). We cannot ignore that Iranians did not and still do not have a very rosy relationship with other Muslim countries in the region. Iran and its sympathizers can blame the countries for having US bases but why not share that blame as Iran presented a reason for those bases to be there, have they ever given any thought to that and try to correct those reasons?

 

[r3alist]

So I’m not trying to be that guy and nothing against Pakistan really nothing against it at all Pakistanis as a whole have sided with Iran but and perhaps Pakistan is working in good faith but I don’t trust the Saudis at all they may have pushed Pakistan to get Iran for a ceasefire so Arabs under trump and Israel could commence an invasion because Pakistan has been attempting to play the neutral party in this and they are using Pakistan for ulterior motives that’s actually plausible

My word, it's like flogging a dead horse, no one can seemingly compel America Iran or Israel to do anything at all.

What is this paranoia about Pakistan having its own agenda to subvert Iran.

We are like 40 days plus into this, to my mind this will create bad blood if this narrative takes hold.

Did you know that Iran has conducted aspects of it's foreign diplomacy through the Pakistan Embassy in USA since they have no diplomatic presence?

Interests Section of Iran in the United States - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Trailer23]

Maybe the Iranians will come by land? A bit risky for them to fly over unless it is a PAF VIP transport plane that they are going to use.

By Land - through Baluchistan - with BLA/BLF/TTP nut-jobs at every corner...

I'd take my chances in the Air.

Besides, by land would mean they'd arrive next week.

 

[Trailer23]

Possibly AI but great nonetheless

Seriously, you want the V.P of USA to be welcomed by Chinese Fighters...

Don't know which genius designed that in Ai.

 

[iron shrapnel]

By Land - through Baluchistan - with BLA/BLF/TTP nut-jobs at every corner...

I'd take my chances in the Air.

Besides, by land would mean they'd arrive next week.

Could be by sea to Karachi or Ormara and then to Islamabad... Most probably they are coming by air... Will PAF provide air cover to them ? Idk