I*R*A
Registered Member
After watching how the Iranian viewpoint about Pakistan is changing, I think Pakistan should come out of this mess. Let the parties fight it out themselves.
At the minimum Pakistan should do this for Pakistan.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
After watching how the Iranian viewpoint about Pakistan is changing, I think Pakistan should come out of this mess. Let the parties fight it out themselves.
Nah, that will never happen
The writing on the wall got clear the day Assad was removed from Syria. Many of the posters who were in celebration mode that day are feeling the heat now !First they came for the Communists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Communist
Then they came for the Socialists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Socialist
Then they came for the trade unionists
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a trade unionist
Then they came for the Jews
And I did not speak out
Because I was not a Jew
Then they came for me
And there was no one left
To speak out for me
Good old Martin Neomoller
Its a fake AI video.This does not sound original. It's similar to what Shiv Aroor had said. I.e., "I have never criticised PM Modi or the BJP before ..." is what Aroor said. Tharoor definitely has critisied Modi and the BJP before, multiple times.
Babe wake up new pahlavist cope has dropped
View attachment 191448
The weak link is Iranian airspace where f35s can shoot down the Iranian delegation. Once in Pakistan it is safer etc
Wrong... on so many levels. Both on nature of conflict, it's genesis, evolution, implications and perception... AND that one is somehow responsible for the actions of other.Okay lets assume Iranians had a nuclear weapon tested and ready, may be this war could have been avoided (this has proven wrong in Pakistan vs india case, the conflict can still exist in some form and shape without escalation to dooms day scenario).
How do Britain and France deal? What territorial, infringement on power, power vacuum or overlapping bilateral longstanding or underlying conflict is there to assume a use of nukes on each other much less a conventional conflict.But how would the region including Pakistan react to that presence?
What would you call all the three states with nukes in NATO?2nd Islamic bomb?
Persian, Kurdish, Baloch... are the ones dying or lying under the rubble also counted for their ethnic make up? Does an indiscriminate munition distinguish race, gender or ethnicity?Or just a Persian bomb?
What they did was reckless but not against Pakistan... and doing so is disingenuous at best. And Pakistani reply in kind was not against Iranian state either... second Iran has a niche in the region... its space cannot be denied and it's defense cannot be assigned to Pakistan... in fact, in this region all are slated to for destruction individually and in isolation... so who is anyone outside of Iran to decide their defense as Pakistan shows its back when it gets pounded by rats tail and a state on the other side of the world.It will certainly be perceived as a threat to the immediate region, given a chance Iranians would act like bullies (they did fire missiles at nuclear Pakistan). We cannot ignore that Iranians did not and still do not have a very rosy relationship with other Muslim countries in the region.
That is funny and a blatant lie. The region was carved by the Brits ... Emirates by treaties with individual sheikhs, Bahrain by parting Brits having a referendum and making it a separate entity outside of Iran and finally Kuwait and Qatar were colonies became own thing after Brits left... that is from the wider Middleeast whose political boundaries owe to mandates, deals... mechinations, connivance and post Ottoman split... nothing to do with Iran. In fact, Iran has had no sectarian bilateral wars with Gulf... though they both funded or backed groups elsewhere on sectarian lines. As to the US presence because of Iran is also a lie... US presence in Kuwait and Emirates was because of Iraq war(Gulf War 1) and started in 1990, in Saudi Arabia started right at the end of second world war and expanded during first Gulf War, in Qatar to manage wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and to protect Qataris from hostile takeover by Saudis. And finally in Oman there has been a longstanding British presence. So, to claim otherwise is just plucking one from thin air.Iran and its sympathizers can blame the countries for having US bases but why not share that blame as Iran presented a reason for those bases to be there, have they ever given any thought to that and try to correct those reasons?
The moment it enters Pakistani airspace it will be escorted by PAF ...no ifs and buts. .. doesn't matter what aircraft is used for this purpose.Provision to the secret service's approval, which I believe will not come. I think Veep will be escorted by the USAF or USN planes, if at all.
I think if JD and Iranian officials meet in Islamabad, Issue of Lebanon and containing Israel will take most of their time. But with Presence of Kushner and Witkov who are basically the eyes and ears of Bibi in the Negotiations, I wonder how it will happen. Israel is becoming to much for even America to contain, lets see how long before American specifically the right wing will raise their own "Austrian Painter" cause Israel just can't help sucking a country and destroying its image.
for them its always about India. so insecure that even a single favourable story about Pakistan is unacceptable.