Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It also shows the world that Iran is rational and serious about making deals. Just because the US wants to sacrifice the world for Israel, it doesn’t mean the rest of the world has to do the same. It should strengthen our position regarding Hormuz s bit. Its possible to make deals without the US afterall. Iran also showed the Americans that Trump will always be Israel firstThink of this as a political win for Iran. If the war dragged on for years, eventually people would have become weary and called for ceasefire and blamed the government for not going for a ceasefire with US. The Zionists are waiting to cause a civilian uprising which is why they have been targeting civilians from day 1.
But, that is out of the picture now. Iran government demonstrated once again that they went to negotiations in good faith and it is US who didn't negotiate in good faith.
This political stunt bought support and time from the people of Iran. This is important because in the coming days the Zionists will be like mad dogs and attack more civilian infrastructure to turn people against the government.
The clerical leadership is anything but religiously-minded, as we have previously seen with their nuclear fatwa. They are self-preserving and prefer to stay in power than to make a bold move and lose everything. And that's exactly the type of mentality that has brought us to this situation now. One can only hope that the IRGC thinks differently
Turkey and Pakistan are of little significance in major global affairs. Major players of this game are the US and China, and surprisingly tiny Israel because of its tremendous influence in the Western world, particularly on the US. After the US and China, Russia comes second, then you have the UK and France to a much lesser extent.
didn't understand this part. All I know is that the US is not going to give Iran a deal with remotely favorable terms until it feels they have no other option left
Not a negative impact, a crippling impact. They will enter or leave Iran with a significant drop in volume. Last time the British tried a similar thing on Iran during the period of oil nationalization, it bankrupted our economy. I expect you to know our history better than foreigners at least.I didn't say it won't have a negative impact, but you said "nothing will enter Iran or leave Iran". Oil is smuggled through fishing boats on the Persian Gulf every day. And other goods will certainly enter through land borders, so it is not correct to say nothing will enter or leave Iran.
The first and foremost was Iran's oil exports. Read again. Without oil exports, Iran will have no money to begin with. Not to mention that large cargos are transported on the sea, including chemicals, agricultural products, etc.What are you talking about? It seems you are switching between various arguments without ending the topic you initiated.
You brought up the issue of pharmaceuticals, food, and goods being restricted from entering the Iranian market. In response, I argued how Washington plans to close the borders of Pakistan and Turkey with Iran to successfully enforce such a blockade.
What's narcissistic about that?
Think of this as a political win for Iran. If the war dragged on for years, eventually people would have become weary and called for ceasefire and blamed the government for not going for a ceasefire with US. The Zionists are waiting to cause a civilian uprising which is why they have been targeting civilians from day 1.
But, that is out of the picture now. Iran government demonstrated once again that they went to negotiations in good faith and it is US who didn't negotiate in good faith.
This political stunt bought support and time from the people of Iran. This is important because in the coming days the Zionists will be like mad dogs and attack more civilian infrastructure to turn people against the government.
Obviously. The worst possible scenario for the people of Iran is to get stuck in the middle of this cycle of war, negotiations, few more years of the same and repeat. Rinse and repeat until Iran is sent back to the stone age and is kept back for an unknown amount of time. That's the worst situation for Iranians and our national interests.I think what you might be really saying is you are of the view that you either win as absolutely as possible, or if you do not then you are content with starting again as the losing side but an opportunity to effectively have an improved social contract between the Iranian people and whoever the new leadership is
and then that really means coming into the Israeli orbit geopolitically, after all netanyahu has stated he believes Iran and Israel will eventually become great friends, and it's not as if there is not a pro Western faction somewhere in the Iranian polity
I never said Turkey and Pakistan were belligerents. I just pointed out the fact that they have no weight on global affairs like the US and China, or even Russia, the UK or France. Not even as much as tiny Israel that controls the Western world.Turkey and Pakistan in this context have remained, by in large, passive with no hint of confrontation
You're discussing a different issue now. Anyway, as I said, on the greater scheme of things, neither Pakistan nor Turkey have the means of changing anything on the ground.but every neighbor is theoretically consequential to another neighbor so I disagree with you there, you say what you say above based on the current balance of equations. But is one aspect dramatically changes then so will the rest.
inherently they both have equities with the current state of world affairs so they need to keep an eye out on their own perspective if suddenly equations change on their own borders, Israel would then consider confrontation with turkey or Pakistan using Iran as its new ally
I accused China of betraying us. I have previously said that Pakistan was not to blame because it doesn't have the weight to influence things. I said Pakistan was just the executioner of decisions made by the US and China about the ceasefire. No blame on Pakistan for any of this.You ought to note that you were able to accuse Pakistan of "treachery" in the last two weeks yet if you theoretically accept the possibility to start again, I.e. not winning , then invariably you will likely become hostile to Pakistan, and maybe China as you go fully into the Israeli and American orbit, in which case I am sure the response will be Iran must pursue its national interest, I am just theoretically speaking
Yes. Fortunately, we will get to witness what will happen in the not too distant future. This whole thing will be resolved by the end of 2026 and if nothing bad happens to us by the grace of God, we will be here to see the outcomes.These blockades are most affecting second and third world countries and they are counting costs, this is not a value judgment just a basic reality
By the way this is just all gaming out different scenarios and so it is just somewhat theoretical and abstract
How? Other than the US, who do you want to make a deal with that can guarantee the US will not attack Iran again?Its possible to make deals without the US afterall.
Im not talking about the war. We can make deals over Hormuz with or without the US. It will help legitimize our claims and strengthen our position in the future.How? Other than the US, who do you want to make a deal with that can guarantee the US will not attack Iran again?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.