When you explain this way then Our military is ill performing continuously or not as it supposed to be. You and many senior members share same view I get it. With my limited intelligence and of course less knowledge then you and many senior members.
Yes in 71 and 98 and in 84 we had one of greatest defeats but now its not same as before and Pakistan is faring better. To me it is, yes you can say your opinion dont matter. But I have also spent being civilian 25 years in PDF and my views are appreciated by many so I expect that many also believe post 2000 we have had good performance. That is why I am saying mistakes of past have made us better, not up to PDF senior members expectations.
Your view is very much 1 sided and you deny the performance of Pakistan military in 19 and 25 war just because of past wars you are still believing we did nothing extraordinary this time as well. we are a poor nation with so many problems, the performance PAF gave was perfect and Pakistan military in Kashmir did great as well. with limited resources our navy did enough for India to not think about sending Indian aircraft carrier. Otherwise Indians always wet day dream of sending vikrant or vikramaditya. So my friend, a respectable senior friend for civilians like me without blind faith and over obsession I believe we did fare well enough it was a fair response if not extraordinary.
My uncles have been in army and from them I came to know we are too good in different aspects for our budget and economical size. So I have good faith.
I could be wrong but this is where this forum discussion comes, to make civilian people of Pakistan aware logically.
Between I am still confused why ceasefire happened in 25 May conflict ? Unfortunately no one can answer that and everyone is just speculating. Maybe then my eyes open if we are still ill prepared. Especially im worried our navy wont last barrages of ashm. Army and Air force are adequately prepared if not Well.
It is not a 1 sided view. Assuming that now isn’t the past or that errors of the past cannot be repeated ignores both human element and assumes both that the past in May 25 will be the same in the future. In other words you are contradicting yourself by saying that the past does not dictate the future.
India is learning all the lessons it needs and has been spending its coffers in extreme urgency with coordinated consulting from Israel, French, Russian, Ukranian and US(selected freelance and official liason) to both update tactics and fill gaps for the next engagement.
Pakistan military isn’t sleeping but right now it’s also feeling the stage 1 impact of the advice given to India with the implosion of the TTA/P front and Balochistan - all wounds of its own doing which are being exploited.
Then there is the internal threat - political actors and external actors - to quote Iqbal from his address in Jerusalem - the threat from enemies is not as great as internal dissent and cohesion.
I don’t mean to downplay injustices which have and are occurring but how by having these issues the overall leadership past/present opens doors for external threats to supercharge the problems - Balochistan is a great example where it is nearly a “no turning back” scenario from a reconciliation perspective.
Then take all of these additional stresses that take both time and resources (money, human etc) to address which the state and ipso facto the military has to allocate and within that general system inefficiencies borne of both cultural and social aspects along with the reality that not every one in Pakistan is A grade no matter what position they are - they sometimes make it there.
Fixing both internal and external issues/defence is important -but that doesn’t mean you need to freeze external defense to fix internal issues or vice versa. However, that also doesn’t mean just because you suck at internal cohesion due to issues outside of the scope of this thread you should not still focus on what you are semi competent in - dont dismiss Peter to criticize Paul.
Take all of the above, then think of how all of these challenges leave MUCH MUCH less room for error for Pakistan vs India who have double digit multiples of resources and a much higher floor for improving themselves once processes align.
So the instead of interpreting what I am saying as doom and gloom - its a caution to stop the repeated luddi and focus on what comes next.
You have examples in history and Pakistan constantly lives out the example of a Uhud after Badr everytime.
Its cultural - and its time to change that.
Celebrate but not excessively.
There is a reason India is where it is due to their BhaktJob Party using this cultural characteristic.
Lets not become them otherwise that does negate the two nation theory if you cannot differentiate in character.