Trump’s extended ceasefire shows his desperation to exit his failed Iran war — but he doesn’t know how
In 1966, the famous American psychologist Abraham Maslow came up with a description of a mental bias that became known as “Maslow’s hammer.”
“If the only tool you have is a hammer, I suppose it is tempting to treat everything as if it were a nail,” Maslow contended. Or, as some have reworded his theorem: When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
This is a good diagnosis for how President Donald Trump has trapped us all in his unnecessary war with Tehran.
A war from which he can’t find a good exit.
It also explains why he
indefinitely extended an April 21 ceasefire deadline with Iran on Tuesday, even though he’d just threatened to resume bombing if there was no nuclear deal by then.
As Maslow would no doubt have diagnosed,
Trump is a bully whose modus operandi is to browbeat, insult, and threaten opponents and allies (especially those who respond with timidity). He is impatient and seeks quick hits and big headlines.
Overseas, the military hammer has become his preferred tactic so long as the strike is quick, as in Venezuela and the U.S. bombing of Iran’s nuclear facilities in June.
But when an adversary is tougher and the fight more complex, with a strategy that outflanks his erratic tactics, POTUS is flummoxed.
The Iran war has laid bare how Trump’s strategic and cognitive weaknesses endanger Americans, as well as the entire world.
“Trump did not know what he was getting into,” I was told by Ryan Crocker, former U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Kuwait, Syria and Lebanon, and one of the smartest Mideast analysts in the field. “
This is the first real foreign policy crisis he has faced, and he has no idea what he is doing. It’s scary.”
POTUS swallowed Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s pitch that Iran’s Islamic regime could quickly be toppled by U.S.-Israeli bombing and replaced by more malleable secular leaders. CIA Director John Ratcliffe called such regime-change scenarios “farcical,” and Secretary of State Marco Rubio labeled them “bullshit,” according to a
New York Times investigation.
But given his lack of knowledge about Iran and his conviction that his instincts trump expertise, the president picked up his military hammer.
Trump underestimated Iranian leaders’ tolerance for pain and determination to salvage their Islamic republic
But most importantly, said Crocker, Trump failed to foresee (even though he was warned) that the Iranians had a critical card to play: the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20% of the world’s energy resources flow. Iran had never tried to close the strait before, but U.S. and Israeli bombs convinced its Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) that this was a necessary option.
“Iran now knows they can close the strait,” Crocker said. “Every day that the strait is closed adds to the economic pain of the U.S., Europe and Asia. This has terrible consequences globally. They have turned the Strait of Hormuz into the Strait of Iran.”
Even Trump, with his unfettered verbosity, has referred to it by that name.
Iran did offer to reopen the strait, but made clear its military would still control traffic in and out and charge tolls to passing tankers. Unsatisfied with this unpleasant option, Trump ordered the U.S. Navy to blockade Iranian ports so its oil exports were also halted.
But Iran’s leaders are betting, probably correctly, that they can withstand that pain longer than Trump can, with his eye on rising gas prices and midterm elections. Tehran says it won’t return to talks until the U.S. blockade is lifted.
Faced with this standoff, and the choice whether to resume bombing or extend the ceasefire deadline again,
Trump blinked.
Let me be clear, I am glad he backed down. But it revealed his desperation to exit the mess he has made.
“Iran has won the first round,” Crocker contended. “This is not going well.”
Trump’s problem is that he now has only bad options to reopen the strait.
Some right-wing hawks are advocating that he pick up the hammer. Fox News’ Hugh Hewitt actually recommended Trump go “full Sherman,” recalling the famed Civil War general’s scorched-earth march to Atlanta, and proposing POTUS destroy all of Iran’s oil and energy infrastructure.
Not only would this be a war crime affecting civilians and a further blow to global energy prices, but it would be unlikely to move the survival-intent hard-line IRGC, which now appears to be running the show.
Moreover, the worst possible option — which would be totally insane — would be for Trump to launch a land war in Iran to try for real “regime change.”
Iran was not an immediate threat to the United States before Trump started this war, and even he knows that sinking into such a bloody quagmire would probably set him on the path to bipartisan impeachment.
The only way out, said Crocker, is to try to swap a simultaneous end to the U.S. blockade against Iran’s ports for a full Iranian opening of the strait. Ideally, this would mean no IRGC control of shipping or tolls on vessels entering or leaving.
“This will be harder for Trump to do now, when he is weaker,” Crocker said. Especially when the Iranians know he is eager for an offramp, after he extended the deadline.
“But it is pretty apparent to everyone, except Donald Trump,” Crocker added, “that he’s not going to bomb Iran out of anything. The only way he can leave (the war) and save face is to get back to the status quo ante on the Strait of Hormuz.”
As for a return to talks on eliminating Iran’s nuclear program, Crocker believes that “at some point we will go back to the table.” However, he noted, the
nuclear deal negotiated by President Barack Obama — which would have halted Iran’s nuclear program for 15 years had Trump not withdrawn from it — took two years to complete.
For future negotiations to have a chance, Trump would have to abandon his “I win, you lose” approach to diplomacy. He would finally have to assemble and listen to an expert team instead of sending his ill-informed real estate buddy and son-in-law.
Hope springs eternal, but this hope requires a suspension of disbelief.
True, Trump is desperate to end his misbegotten Iran venture, but he seems to believe he is winning. On Truth Social last week, he was posting New York Times clips from 2004, citing the top ratings of “The Last Season of My Apprentice Juggernaut.” In other words, how can such a winner be wrong?
The best we can hope for is that fear of higher gas prices will keep Trump’s hammer in abeyance —
and that he will find a way to negotiate the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, declare a fake victory, and bring the troops home.
Perhaps after this Iran debacle, the U.S. public will grasp the danger of leaving a one-tool president in charge of foreign policy and the nuclear button when they vote in November — and choose legislators who are willing and able to rein him in.
In 1966, the famous American psychologist Abraham Maslow came up with a description of a mental bias that became known as “Maslow’s hammer.”
lasvegassun.com
@Master Chief --- Nice read...........
www.whitehouse.gov
