Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion

[Toxic]

If you think delivering JDAM level firepower through Ballistic Missiles is good idea then good luck with that.It didn't really worked for Iran and neither it will work for Pakistan.

For hitting hardened targets , a large warhead is needed but with the accuracy like that of F2 , that's off the table.

Dude thinks this is scuds that are being tested, if you read his comments you would think missile fell a kilometer from the target rather then barely 5 meters from the center.

 

[MS Sandhu]

You just shifted the goal post:

The point was simple,
Pakistani missiles are poor in precision and May conflict is all over the place for evidence.

 

[Bilal]

The point was simple,
Pakistani missiles are poor in precision and May conflict is all over the place for evidence.

Brother. You are going on a tangent. One after the other.

From f2 being heavy compared to PrSM to warhead being large due to low accuracy to justifying SK missile’s heavy warhead due to specific needs (thank you, my point exactly), to (now) may conflict where this specific F2 BM has not even used.

 

[Maarkhoor]

Koreans have great industrial base and can churn out missiles in hundreds per year.
Poor Pakistan may be 40-50 units per year at most.

Ok go to Korea instead of living here and enjoy KPOOP.

Jinn logoun ko koi 2 rupey ki kulfi nahien pochta bloody cult followers trying hard to put Pakistan down.

 

[Maarkhoor]

Brother. You are going on a tangent. One after the other.

From f2 being heavy compared to PrSM to warhead being large due to low accuracy to justifying SK missile’s heavy warhead due to specific needs (thank you, my point exactly), to (now) may conflict where this specific F2 BM has not even used.

Bhai cult followers trolling this thread, Ms Sandhu is probably Mr sandhu a rabid cult follower.
Report and move on.

 

[farooqbhai]

This circle will get wide and open in presence of enemy's EW/spoofing.
This is exactly what happened to F1s in May.

And prsm is resistant to ew right ... What r u smoking

 

[Bilal]

If it achieved even less then half of what Iskander did, I will be a happy man (if we are going by warhead size).

My theory is, that through out the evolution of our missile program, we were focused on dual use, with more inclination towards missiles carry nuclear warheads, and more recently, tactical nukes. We have not paid enough attention towards conventional use. We have not demonstrated the capability to equip our delivery machisms with thermobarics, for example. There is very noticeable gap between nukes and conventional warheads. If we dont have inhouse expertise, work with Türkiye

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Since Gazap is an airdropped thermobaric bomb. This seems close:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[Toxic]

Since Gazap is an airdropped thermobaric bomb. This seems close:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

Wait what is that?

 

[Bilal]

Wait what is that?

Something tested years back. PAF censored the weapon in the released footage and never gave the name of the system.

Clearer video:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

 

[kimjongun]

Since you call me uncle so Beta baap se baat kerney se pehle tried to learn and respect.

aw hell nahh , you got hurt unc

 

[Oscar]

what when did we landed a ghauri in iran?
Kher bhai , Solid rocket propellent is very hard to explode on impact , this is a safety measure to ensure the missile doesnt go haywire , on falling during loading , secondly SRM are made to empty themselves and since they burn outwards(towards the case) leaving the theory of unburnt rocket fuel not making sense , also plz explain me this
View attachment 194586View attachment 194587

That is a warhead explosion - solid fuel systems wont normally burn @Maarkhoor - check out Iran hits - they would either disperse the sludgy grain which can burn but what you see with F2 is warhead detonation.

F2 is not like your strategic systems in that they will be kept with live warheads all the time.

Ghauris have - well - a long nodong history of working and not working as expected which is why they have been relegated to specific targets where the liquid fueled control is needed otherwise your primary systems are from the Shaheen lineage

 

[Corax]

Something tested years back. PAF censored the weapon in the released footage and never gave the name of the system.

Clearer video:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

It was probably a REK kit on one of the Mk series of bombs, I think I've seen the same video without the censor.

 

[Bilal]

It was probably a REK kit on one of the Mk series of bombs, I think I've seen the same video without the censor.

Yes it does have REK type wings. The other video is different. Here:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Accept third party cookies

The unnamed weapon’s explosion is much bigger and looks like a FAE/thermobaric.

 

[Oscar]

For the honorable members who disagree with me, No when H.E warhead explodes it creates massive shock wave but subject video only shows small fire ball which means it only caused by unspent solid fuel since it was a test so no country would test solid fuel with 100 percent fuel spent since after all fuel spent missile will fell like a rock escially short ranges when gravity works against suppressed trajectory "to avoid ABM" so google it or search on chatgpt or eat baddam.

it is possible especially if there was quite a bit of unspent fuel (because maximum range was not tested) and also possible dummy warhead was used.
But since we don’t have the full video of this or I haven’t seen it - a simple test will be shockwave vs just fireball. HE warheads actual force is less fireball and more overpressure shockwave.

If the test launch resulted in an impact where the motor casing remained somewhat intact or the fuel was packed tightly, a high pressure shockwave event could theoretically occur, creating a shockwave that feels and acts like a smaller explosive detonation. However, if the propellant simply spilled out and burned in the open, it would likely produce a massive, intense fireball and significant heat, but without the high velocity “dhamaka” shock front expected from an HE warhead.

 

[kimjongun]

Is it possible that the New TEL camo will be used from now on specifically ARFC in this case as they tested the missile? those green ones are a target for drones in desert terrains