Jaeger
Registered Member
Lol, that's only because you Indians are not aware of the name. It's is the Chinese name for the region ever since Tibet was/is part of China.
Sure why not, why don't you post sources to back up your claim.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol, that's only because you Indians are not aware of the name. It's is the Chinese name for the region ever since Tibet was/is part of China.
My friend, we will.South Tibet/Arunachal Pradesh never belonged to India. It was part of Qing dynasty China.
I hope China gets its land back like it should get Taiwan back.
You are so ignorant, that's your own problem. That's general knowledge.Sure why not, why don't you post sources to back up your claim.
India believes it is the legitimate successor of the whole old British Empire.You are so ignorant, that's your own problem. That's general knowledge.
We always call it Zangnan, what source do you like to see? Calling it Zangnan?You can't present even a single source to back up your claim?
The fact of the matter is, china took thousands square KM just recently, and your PM said "no one crossed in to our territories",Considering that the name "Zangan" did not even exist till last year.
Certainly gives a lot of credence to Chinese ownership of Arunachal Pradesh, or your endorsement of it..lol
We always call it Zangnan, what source do you like to see? Calling it Zangnan?
Lol..your argument about Arunachal Pradesh being called Zimzam has already fallen apart so soon, that now you deflect on to Ladakh?The fact of the matter is, china took thousands square KM just recently, and your PM said "no one crossed in to our territories",
What is a "neutral" map? so funny, we always call it Zangnan, it has been always part of Tibet historically, culturally and ethnically, nothing to do with Britain. How British can just draw a line and make it theirs?Preferably a non Chinese, neutral map labeling the region as Zimzam.
only if you understood the reference, but my mistake I expected too much from you.Lol..your argument about Arunachal Pradesh being called Zimzam has already fallen apart so soon, that now you deflect on to Ladakh?
What is a "neutral" map? so funny, we always call it Zangnan, it has been always part of Tibet historically, culturally and ethnically, nothing to do with Britain. How British can just draw a line and make it theirs?
You know what Zangnan mean in Chinese ? It means South Tibet. That's really logical and meaningful name for the region from the start. Don't have to prove that to you nonsense Indians.You can't present even a single source to back up your claim?
What source? like this?Please produce a source, just a single source to back up your claim.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.