Pakistan Rocket Force Command News and Discussions

[Starlord]

anyone know who this chacha is? Chacha jee Ababeel 2 aur Shaheen 4 ki baaten ker rahe hai with potential range of Ab 2 to be around 7500km, and S4 to be around 5500km.

 

[Ibbi32]

View attachment 197004
anyone know who this chacha is? Chacha jee Ababeel 2 aur Shaheen 4 ki baaten ker rahe hai with potential range of Ab 2 to be around 7500km, and S4 to be around 5500km.

Tipu ICBM aur ghauri IV tak nahi ponche?

 

[Starlord]

Tipu ICBM aur ghauri IV tak nahi ponche?

 

[Intervention-06]

View attachment 197004
anyone know who this chacha is? Chacha jee Ababeel 2 aur Shaheen 4 ki baaten ker rahe hai with potential range of Ab 2 to be around 7500km, and S4 to be around 5500km.

He is Harris Khan- defence analyst- he was leading Member of first Pakistani defence online forum pakdef.com ….

 

[Ibbi32]

Great analysis.
IMO ,
Fatah v should be a Tactical ballistic system with a unique trajectory , I would be more then happy if it has a MaRV.

HGVs are quite expensive and niche systems , they require high apogees too which is difficult to achieve in our scenario as India is very close to us and most interceptions would happen in the boost or mid course phase. iran has this "faida" that it gets to see most of its RVs striking the zio soil and not get sniped in boost phase.

Our strategy should be to use SRBMs /TBMs to overwhelm the indian ABM shield , they don't have that density to counter large ALBM , GLBM salvos.

I am more intrigued in the potential upgrade we should do of the Shaheen 1/1A platform . Its a highly versatile design and we have learnt a lot from it , wont be difficult for us to design some MaRVs ( iranians were able to do it) as we have a new RV on the Shaheen 1A .
We can pull a lot of variants from it but the catch is that we need to invest in it.

Only if we can mass produce the missiles to this level...I really admire DPRK in terms of missile production.
View attachment 197000View attachment 197001View attachment 197002

Imo srbms and mrbms are the way to go. A decade ago we completed full spectrum detterence against india with s2/3 and ababeel and maintained capability to strike anywhere with in India within minutes. This was a 25 year long process. We couldve used the last decade to radically increase lethality of this capability but we remained largely idle, today there is need for large scale arsenal of these types of munitions in creating full spectrum conventional detterence like we built that nuclear detterence a decade ago. But today we have full support of superpower china, we can learn from wars in mid east and we have imperative to do so given may and creation parfc.

That capability that took 25 years can now be done better cheaper and on a much larger scale in the next 5 years. Full spectrum conventional detterence with tube arty, MLRS,BM,CM,SSCM,OWA,LM,UCAVs from 0 to 2000+km. The message must be clear another sindoor and india will be unrecognisable

 

[safriz]

Why are you making and spreading these meaningless rumors?

Pakistan does not have any platform to launch the YJ-17 missile. Do you want to launch it with your mouth?

Don't lie .
Here's the proof.
Indian style proof

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

Its a ship bassed missile man , why doo you all get so excited and start claiming things which we havent seen yet??

The children that never grew up.

 

[Pakistan Space Agency]

Great analysis.
IMO ,
Fatah v should be a Tactical ballistic system with a unique trajectory , I would be more then happy if it has a MaRV.

HGVs are quite expensive and niche systems , they require high apogees too which is difficult to achieve in our scenario as India is very close to us and most interceptions would happen in the boost or mid course phase. iran has this "faida" that it gets to see most of its RVs striking the zio soil and not get sniped in boost phase.

Our strategy should be to use SRBMs /TBMs to overwhelm the indian ABM shield , they don't have that density to counter large ALBM , GLBM salvos.

I am more intrigued in the potential upgrade we should do of the Shaheen 1/1A platform . Its a highly versatile design and we have learnt a lot from it , wont be difficult for us to design some MaRVs ( iranians were able to do it) as we have a new RV on the Shaheen 1A .
We can pull a lot of variants from it but the catch is that we need to invest in it.

Only if we can mass produce the missiles to this level...I really admire DPRK in terms of missile production.
View attachment 197000View attachment 197001View attachment 197002

We don't face an existential threat like North Korea. We face an election threat from India instead.

 

[falcon34]

Kuch sunnay main aya tu hay ... par bataonga nahi abhi. Paka ho jae.

Sun nae Mae bohat Kuch a Raha but the reality is F5 is on the drawing board, army walae Kuch bhi kehtae rehtae, asal Kahani nescom walo ke pass ha.
Mujhe toh literally F3 ke barae Mae sun kar depression ho gaya ha.
Allah hi Hafiz ha is mulk ka.
Both are no way near any capability for pak, Even F3 is half a decade away let alone F5

 

[RealNapster]

What about having YKJ-1000 commercially made system by Chinese company with only US$ 100,000/- each with capability to be produced with dual purpose technologies.

China’s YKJ-1000: The Low-Cost Hypersonic Missile Shaking Global Military Power and Indo-Pacific Security - Defence Security Asia https://share.google/iTbYs9YiiYZHcA4Gj

Yes. But how authentic are the companies claims regarding the speed, price, and range ? After all this is the very first product of this company and I am not sure if we habe seen any test video or pictures.

 

[RealNapster]

He is Harris Khan- defence analyst- he was leading Member of first Pakistani defence online forum pakdef.com ….

Acha acha. To ye pakdef.com kay zarvan Chacha thy.

By the way jokes aside, I dont think rocket force should be equipped with anything more than 1500 km range. Because if I ever need to attack calcuta with a missile, let it be nuclear. Operating high range conventional rocket/missile force and then nuclear missiles as well, it's too much for our defence budget.

 

[SABRE]

bhai koi achi khaber ho plz lazmi tag kr dena . achi khaber sune kafi tiem ho gaya ha

It points to good news, but it is still unsubstantiated, at least from my own perspective. Also, given the limited information I have, I cannot say whether it is partially good news or fully compliant with the public expectation. We'll have to wait and see.

 

[Zarvan]

Don't lie.
Here's the proof.
Indian style proof

View attachment 197010

Do you realize how easy it is to make land versions of these missiles, especially for a country like Pakistan which has 30 years of experience in ballistic, cruise, and other forms of missiles?

 

[kimjongun]

Do you realize how easy it is to make land versions of these missiles, especially for a country like Pakistan which has 30 years of experience in ballistic, cruise, and other forms of missiles?

These are not old russian R27 SLBMs which you can just change into ICBMs , these are way more sophisticated and have an HGV . its very much difficult to do it

 

[Zarvan]

Kim Jong-un

No, it's not. Land versions of YJ 15, YJ 17, YJ 19, and YJ 20 can be developed; in fact, some reports from China say that they are already have both land, sea, and submarine.