Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Persian Gulf said:
Saudi Arabia has more of a capability to respond, and complicates things with Pakistan.

focus on the smaller countries first.

Iraq still has many assets that Iran has not touched (especially in Baghdad). and it remains the main route for any possible Kurdish incursion (which I don't think is likely at this point, but still).
Click to expand...
we should finish of kuwait and Bahrain then proceed with Qatar and UAE ... if they continue to attack our infrastructure , we should target UAE nuclear site and make it unhabitale .
 
Persian Gulf said:
better to keep Israel out of this for now until Iran can degrade US bases in the region

Kuwait
Bahrain
Jordan
Qatar
Iraq
UAE
Saudi Arabia

in this order. there is a lot to get through
Click to expand...

Persian Gulf said:
These Arab states are enabling US attacks against Iranian critical infrastructure. The proper and logical response is to show these Arab states that if they do that, they will face the same fate.
Click to expand...


The enabling happened about 20 years ago once the infrastructure was in place, after that point it was fait accompli that they would be operational maybe one day, this is nothing new.

Now sounds like the Arab states are the number one enemy and Israel is an afterthought.

As if Israel will cry that the vanguard nation of Shia Islam is weakening the vanguard Nations of sunni Islam, because that's not an old trick is it 🙄



This whole logic becomes really weird from Iran, you have an absolutist demand that the gulf Arab States overnight completely overhaul their entire security architecture.... really?
 
r3alist said:
The enabling happened about 20 years ago once the infrastructure was in place, after that point it was fait accompli that they would be operational maybe one day, this is nothing new.

Now sounds like the Arab states are the number one enemy and Israel is an afterthought.

As if Israel will cry that the vanguard nation of Shia Islam is weakening the vanguard Nations of sunni Islam, because that's not an old trick is it 🙄



This whole logic becomes really weird from Iran, you have an absolutist demand that the gulf Arab States overnight completely overhaul their entire security architecture.... really?
Click to expand...
The demand is only that Arabs do not allow the US to use their territory to attack Iran. It is not asking for much. If it is too much, then there will be consequences. That is all.
 
RocketLaw said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Iran doesn't have to sink US Navy ships if it can deny them port radar and satellite guidance, logistics, resupply, and refuelling.

Iran's military objective is clear: Force US military to leave all regional bases and ports.
Click to expand...

Interesting but the US won't be permanently leaving any bases or installations in the area anytime soon
 
BananaRepublic said:
They aren’t really “third countries”! They are client states.

You really are fretting over whether to hit California or Texas because of their political hue.

It’s all US!
Click to expand...

since when is starvation a valid war approach unless you are clearly saying it is?


This whole client state or not client state mentality is regressive and binary in a self defeating way

You will completely lose the battle of ideas and the Muslim Street, anyway this is an extreme hypothetical
 
r3alist said:
The enabling happened about 20 years ago once the infrastructure was in place, after that point it was fait accompli that they would be operational maybe one day, this is nothing new.

Now sounds like the Arab states are the number one enemy and Israel is an afterthought.

As if Israel will cry that the vanguard nation of Shia Islam is weakening the vanguard Nations of sunni Islam, because that's not an old trick is it 🙄



This whole logic becomes really weird from Iran, you have an absolutist demand that the gulf Arab States overnight completely overhaul their entire security architecture.... really?
Click to expand...
These arabs attacked our country we should kill them ...

after finishing these countries , Israel will be next target ... if its nessccary we should put the enriched uranium and target them with it ...

I don't give **** about moral values at this stage ...
 
r3alist said:
The enabling happened about 20 years ago once the infrastructure was in place, after that point it was fait accompli that they would be operational maybe one day, this is nothing new.

Now sounds like the Arab states are the number one enemy and Israel is an afterthought.

As if Israel will cry that the vanguard nation of Shia Islam is weakening the vanguard Nations of sunni Islam, because that's not an old trick is it 🙄



This whole logic becomes really weird from Iran, you have an absolutist demand that the gulf Arab States overnight completely overhaul their entire security architecture.... really?
Click to expand...
Its pretty simple, no?

Dont let your country become a launching pad to attack another country.

How would Pakistan react if indian airforce started using afghanistan bases and attack kpk and balochistan?
 
r3alist said:
since when is starvation a valid war approach unless you are clearly saying it is?


This whole client state or not client state mentality is regressive and binary in a self defeating way

You will completely lose the battle of ideas and the Muslim Street, anyway this is an extreme hypothetical
Click to expand...

I have no idea why you have started a quarrel with me!

I cannot remember when we have disagreed on philosophy.

I am very clear.

If Iran’s food supplies are attacked then all bets are off.

As I said, starving people cannot be held morally accountable.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 6 more.
    • Total: 423 (members: 38, guests: 385)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top