Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

[shapurzolaktaf]

Iran is not being Genocided and has other means to ensure it never gets Genocided!

How will Iran respond if Isfahan and Tehran get nuked like Nagasaki and Hiroshima?

Let me know about the "other means", I'm interested to know what those means are.

 

[Jalz]

What are the chances of a military coup in Iran right now? Are the IRGC & SL giving their tacit consent on this agreement?

There will never be a coup. The islamic republic actually respects its own constitution.

 

[Kyussis]

For the proponents of Iran acquiring Nuclear weapons. Do you think it is possible that Iran can build them without the U.S sniffing it out? How do you think the U.S or Israel would react if they new Iran was actively working on building them?

 

[ShapurII]

For the proponents of Iran acquiring Nuclear weapons. Do you think it is possible that Iran can build them without the U.S sniffing it out? How do you think the U.S or Israel would react if they new Iran was actively working on building them?

Then why the hell did you accumulate 440 kilograms of 60% HEU?

I mean make it make sense. Choose one. Either do not build nukes and give up on that stupid useless nuclear program which has caused nothing but three decades of sanctions and suffering, or grow a pair and build them.

 

[BHAN85]

A weapon that destroys a large swath of land along with everything on it is absolutely Haram. Iran will never develop Nuclear weapons as long as it is an Islamic nation. The Individual who wrote that fatwa was not afraid of death and died a just man with the largest crowd of mourners in all of Human history. Iran is full of men and women who don't need to hide behind the most disgustingly vile weapon to have ever been devised!

the weapon only do that if you use it.

build the weapon can't be haram.

Haram could be use the weapon, never build it, especially if your intention is never use it.

Can't you see the difference among build and usage concepts? All the bad things you can say about nukes it's about use nukes, it's not about build and store it. You harm no one building and storing nukes.

 

[BHAN85]

the cuck speech about forbid nukes is tiring.

it only has sense from the enemy perspective.

you harm no one building nukes. you only harm if you use nukes. repeat until fully understand it.

 

[Kyussis]

How will Iran respond if Isfahan and Tehran get nuked like Nagasaki and Hiroshima?

Let me know about the "other means", I'm interested to know what those means are.

Iran can flatten Tel Aviv and Haifa without Nuclear weapons. It can wipe out all energy infrastructure within missile range. It can take out Dimona nuclear facilities. There is a reason why Trump never carried out his threat of "ending Iran's Civilization" and it sure as hell is not a "humanitarian" one!

 

[Magi]

Iran is not being Genocided and has other means to ensure it never gets Genocided!

The problem with that line is, by the time you find out genocide is underway it is already too late. Reminds me of "no war, no negotiations."

 

[ShapurII]

the cuck speech about forbid nukes is tiring.

it only has sense from the enemy perspective.

you harm no one building nukes. you only harm if you use nukes. repeat until fully understand it.

Even the use of nuclear weapons is not haram in retaliation. Weapons of mass destruction did not exist back then. There is no specific mention of weapons of mass destruction in the Quran, obviously. However, the Quran says Muslims should not bring harm to civilians or animals, or the lands they conquer indiscriminately.

On the other hand, Islam explicitly says that Muslims have to treat their enemies in the same way they have treated them. Basically, it means that if your enemy nuked you, nuke them back. It is right from the Quran, Surah Al-Baqarah 2:194

"So whoever has assaulted you, then assault him in the same way that he has assaulted you."

If anything, nuking your enemy in retaliation is completely in line with the Quran.

And in Surah Al-Anfal 8:60, Quran explicitly orders Muslims to arm themselves with whatever weapon that is available. It is not a recommendation, it is not an opinion. It is a divine duty for Muslims to arm themselves with whatever they can, including nuclear weapons.

 

[Kyussis]

Then why the hell did you accumulate 440 kilograms of 60% HEU?

I mean make it make sense. Choose one. Either do not build nukes and give up on that stupid useless nuclear program which has caused nothing but three decades of sanctions and suffering, or grow a pair and build them.

Iran will never give up on its right to a peaceful nuclear program. Iran enriched to 60% HEU as a bargaining chip. Iran was willing to dilute it down to below 5% if a proper deal could be made.

 

[ShapurII]

Iran will never give up on its right to a peaceful nuclear program. Iran enriched to 60% HEU as a bargaining chip. Iran was willing to dilute it down to below 5% if a proper deal could be made.

A bargaining chip for what exactly?

Iran never had a peaceful nuclear program. Iran couldn't produce even one year worth of Bushehr's nuclear fuel after 20 years of enrichment. lol

 

[Kyussis]

He thinks if he flattens Tel Aviv and Haifa, Israel will just watch and won't nuke Tehran. What a retard lol

He constantly whines that if Iran acquires nuclear weapons, the US and Israel will nuke us but then promotes that we should attack Dimona, which is an active nuclear facility, which without a shred of doubt will lead to nuclear retaliation by Israel at least.

He's either retarded, or a Mossad agent disguising himself as a pro-Iran person. There's no other explanation.

I was asked what could Iran do in retaliation to Tehran and Esfehan being nuked!
So if I don't want to see Iran nuked in the pursuit of Nukes, I must be retarded or a Mossad agent huh? Get over yourself

 

[ShapurII]

I was asked what could Iran do in retaliation to Tehran and Esfehan being nuked!

So, Tehran and Isfahan have been nuked, hundreds of thousands of people have died already, millions need medical treatment which will be impossible to provide and will die in a matter of days due to high radiation exposure and severe burns, millions of people have become homeless and have to leave the nearby areas and satellite cities of Tehran and your answer is to attack Dimona?

OK. Let's study that scenario. You will attack Dimona. First of all, before you do that, the Israelis will shut down Dimona. They're not stupid. Every modern nuclear reactor can be shut down gracefully with no radiation risk. And even if Iranian missiles land on Dimona and do not get intercepted, at best, you'll have something on a significantly smaller scale than what happened in Fukushima, Japan.

What do you think will happen then? The Israelis will nuke Shiraz, Tabriz, Mashhad, Qom, and possibly other populated cities one by one, in any order they want. What will be your response then?

So if I don't want to see Iran nuked in the pursuit of Nukes, I must be retarded or a Mossad agent huh? Get over yourself

No, you want to see Iran nuked over the pursuit of Palestinian liberation, and lack of deterrence in response to the US and Israeli atrocities against our country. But that's just the appearance of it. Nobody knows your real intentions for writing such nonsense.

 

[shapurzolaktaf]

He thinks if he flattens Tel Aviv and Haifa, Israel will just watch and won't nuke Tehran. What a retard lol

He constantly whines that if Iran acquires nuclear weapons, the US and Israel will nuke us but then promotes that we should attack Dimona, which is an active nuclear facility, which without a shred of doubt will lead to nuclear retaliation by Israel at least.

He's either retarded, or a Mossad agent disguising himself as a pro-Iran person. There's no other explanation.

No need for personal attacks, he has his own opinion (influenced by religious interpretations which other Shia could disagree with), but I just consider it unrealistic and dangerous. I think there was a poll in Iran which showed 70-80% of Iranians want Iran to posses nuclear weapons.

 

[ShapurII]

No need for personal attacks, he has his own opinion (influenced by religious interpretations which other Shia could disagree with), but I just consider it unrealistic and dangerous. I think there was a poll in Iran which showed 70-80% of Iranians want Iran to posses nuclear weapons.

His ideas are extremely dangerous. Period.