Operation Ghazab Lil Haq (Pakistan - Afghanistan War)

As far as economic development during Ayub Khan's time is concerned, America and the West have the capability to develop any third world country ruled by their local agent. You can see examples of Singapore, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Indonesia, South Korea, Japan, Germany, Turkey. Their policies are based on Capitalism which favours the few rich families over the masses and gave the slogan of Trickle Down Economy while in actuality it is the Trickle Up Economy to this day.

As far as India is concerned many of the sons of rich Hindu Seths were members of Congress and followed the made in India policy for many decades.

As far as Islamic Economic System is concerned, it is better than both Capitalism and Socialism and follows the middle path just like the pro-poor economic and social systems of Norway and Sweden. Under the Islamic System the poor, the sick, the elderly, the infants, the widows are all cared for by the government. Every day on Facebook, I see videos of grown Pakistan men and old men crying in front of cameras about the hard financial times they are facing in Punjab and the rest of Pakistan because of unchecked Capitalism and Corruption.

Pakistan has always been a broke country unable to fulfill its potential because half of its population are illiterate and live like bandits.

1789838379497.png

What I liked about Ayub Khan was he understood the nature of the afghans very clearly, he hated them and made sure Pakistan was ideologically and politically aligned to this.



The closest we got to this was Musharraf. He should have been allowed to complete his work.

Taliban Khan helped to push him out and then started protesting the drone strikes on the complicit people of FATA sheltering talib fighters and here we are in 2026 still going through the motions.

 
Last edited:
Only if you studied how Ayub Khan economy worked or was engineered to work.

Ayub Khan’s economic boom during the 1960s was driven in large part by substantial foreign assistance and external financing from the Americans and World Bank courtesy of Cold War politics, complemented by domestic investment, state-directed credit allocation, protectionist policies, and rapid private-sector industrialization. While these policies generated impressive rates of economic growth and accelerated industrial development, the gains were distributed unevenly. Economic ownership and wealth became increasingly concentrated among a relatively small group of industrial and financial elites; as few would know, among those 22 prominent families, they controlled different ministries and were awarded permits and various authorizations to do business, in a way that prevented new entrants from coming into the market and growing.

Another aspect you can look at is that Ayub & today's PML-N heavily used external capital and financing to subsidize imports that helped relax the balance-of-payments constraints; this allowed the importation of capital goods (equipment & machinery, etc.). In the end, the results faltered; it took the 1965 Indo-Pak War to show how the industrial momentum quickly collapsed, and that without external capital and financing, the Pakistan economic model fails.
This is the exact economic strategy that south korea also copied but added their Export Target ELement on so they succeeded. Ayub Was very close to the true economic blueprint from agrarian to powerhouse. However the Political Continuity did not exist for it.

Even South Korea used Foreign Aid For this Strategy so Foreign Aid itself is not a bad thing, it is what u do with foreign aid is what differentiates you from the rest.
 
Pakistan has always been a broke country unable to fulfill its potential because half of its population are illiterate and live like bandits.

View attachment 216171

What I liked about Ayub Khan was he understood the nature of the afghans very clearly, he hated them and made sure Pakistan was ideologically and politically aligned to this.



The closest we got to this was Musharraf. He should have been allowed to complete his work.

Taliban Khan helped to push him out and then started protesting the drone strikes on the complicit people of FATA sheltering talib fighters and here we are in 2026 still going through the motions.


The Truth is that You can see an Poor Nation like South Korea, they had nothing and were treated like Sub Saharan Africa. But they invested extremely heavily in Human Capital and Built KAIST which catapulted them and produced engineers & Scientists, their literacy rate skyrocketed too and they did aggressive land reform early to create a smallholder population willing to buy goods of their chaebols. then Forced those Chabeols to Export or Die.
 
The Truth is that You can see an Poor Nation like South Korea, they had nothing and were treated like Sub Saharan Africa. But they invested extremely heavily in Human Capital and Built KAIST which catapulted them and produced engineers & Scientists, their literacy rate skyrocketed too and they did aggressive land reform early to create a smallholder population willing to buy goods of their chaebols. then Forced those Chabeols to Export or Die.

Their people evolved, their children became educated and civilized and produced more generations who continued their path to progress.

Capacity building to become a reliable cog in the global supply chains doesn't happen overnight.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Back
Top