US-Denmark reach deal over Greenland

[Hamartia Antidote]

View attachment 216154

What the US has gained is "veto" power over investments that Greenlanders have said they will never allow to take place. The US has not gained investment rights into minerals extraction, ie veto over others. Logically, what has changed given Greenland's stance on this matter?

View attachment 216155

This was never going to happen, so what was materially significant or practical achieved here? What has changed over something that was not going to take place?

View attachment 216156

So, the right to veto investments, but not the right to do investments itself for the USA, ie USA does not gain new rights to invest in mineral extraction and the Greenlanders have been clear they have no plans for any mineral extraction work by anyone ever.. they want to keep Greenland clean, and prestine... so what was materially significant or practical achieved here?
View attachment 216157

So, a permanent no to Russian/Chinese troops that were never going to be allowed onto Greenland in the first place, and a permanent veto over investments that were never going to take place ever and the right for USA tax payers to build military bases in Greenland to protect Greenlanders itself...A right, i might add it had since the 1951 agreement with both Denmark and Greenland both stating there are were never, and are no restrictions on military deployments under the 1951 agreement. ie materially insignificant..

Is this really winning? Or have you been smoking orange tinted copium for a little bit too long?

No, you missed a big point. It says if Denmark lets Greenland go Independent all the rights the US just signed will be maintained. The US just headed off any future resource agreements.

 

[BHAN85]

the island will be filled with interceptors from golden dome.

it seems usa can't rely so much in aegis destructors for missile defense, since big underwater drones were developed by russia and china.

but drones cant go underground, so a island is perfectly safe to launch interceptors.

 

[Viet]

Without the official text being released, it is unclear how exactly the deal differs from a 1951 agreement with Denmark, under which the US can send as many troops as it wants to Greenland.

The US already has more than 100 military personnel permanently stationed at its Pituffik base in the north-western tip of the territory.

BBC News source.

So its a nothing burger just to get a high rise in the levis of maga addicted simpletons

Trump is a salesman. He puts old shoes in a new shoe box and sells as new shoes.

 

[F-22Raptor]

Even Arnaud, a well known anti American, recognizes the US has gained full control of Greenland

 

[AZ_HighCountry]

the island will be filled with interceptors from golden dome.

it seems usa can't rely so much in aegis destructors for missile defense, since big underwater drones were developed by russia and china.

but drones cant go underground, so a island is perfectly safe to launch interceptors.

That's been tried before. Too much ice.