NGAD IS THE BEST
Elite Member
Why?
Pakistan Missiles - Updates, News & Discussion
- Thread starter ghazi52
- Start date
Khansaheeb
Elite Member
The goal of Pakistani military researchers should be to come up with a radar absorbent material that can withstand high temperatures and reduced infrared signature from the Missile exhaust.
kaku
Registered Member
Actually whenever Phase II become operational. And combining it with PDV, AAD.
It will be on par with GMD+ THAAD+ SM6.
CynicalPakistaniCritic
Registered Member
Because when we decide to stop behaving like beghairat cucks and actually work for our interests, these weapons will be needed.
Sparten
Registered Member
Basically. If you rely on BM for long range strike you are admitting your AF sucks. In our case, the BM are dedicated to the nuclear role, until the Fatah series, which seem to be an attempt to provide long range fires to Corps and Army HQ rather than be a substitute for Air power.
Our missiles will be smaller in number than Iran's, but much more sophisticated, due to being tasked with nuclear strike.
TallGuy
Registered Member
have you ever seen what invading armies do once they capture the area. for sake of knowledge they Rape and kill.
do you live in Pakistan? if you do and you have family particularly sisters/mothers/wife just a single thought of it sends shivers down my spine.
so all is easy to say..but when shit hits the fan. whatever is my army/airforce will be getting killed including myself defending what is mine.
you give single rupee or millions there is no substitute.
Read history and understand the consequences.
Admiral General Aladin
Registered Member
DDG-80
Trusted Member
PDV Mk2 has shown that if we wanted to intercept an ICBM in the mid course phase or just at the start of the RE entry phase, then this is the answer. That massive booster. Now it shows that we have the necessary mid course interceptor missile with a KKV and required lateral thrusters. Once the kill vehicle is in the vicinity of the impact point, it switches on its Imaging Infrared seeker.They are our own version of GBI.lol.comparing MIRV missile with satellite.
Both AD-1 and 2 and PDV MKII can intercept 5500 km class missiles and even higher ranged ones. But one targets the hostile ballistic missile in the RE entry descent phase, the other in the mid course phase.
Last edited:
Abid123
Trusted Member
You are 100% right, but our generals think:
"Arre saar, we are full on following Amreekan doctrine na, even if our economy is totally down the drain".
PAKISTANFOREVER
Trusted Member
Whatever strife is going on in Pakistan, let one reality be certain. If indian troops EVER enter Pakistan, a fate worst than hell awaits them. A beast will be unleashed that has not been seen before.
ghazi52
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
- Thread starter
- #297
Pakistan rejected what it said was the “political use of export controls” after the United States imposed sanctions on four entities for their alleged involvement in supplying “missile-applicable items” to Pakistan’s ballistic missile programme, the Foreign Office (FO) said on Saturday.
The US State Department claimed on Friday evening that the entities — three Chinese and one from Belarus — were particularly assisting Pakistan’s long-range missile endeavors.
The statement specified that “the ultimate goal of sanctions is not to punish, but to bring about a positive change in behavior.”
The entities facing sanctions include the Belarus-based Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant, the People’s Republic of China-based Xi’an Longde Technology Development Company Limited, Tianjin Creative Source International Trade Co Ltd and Granpect Company Limited.
As per the sanctions imposed under Executive Order 13382, all property and interests in property of the designated entities that are in the United States or under the control of US persons are now blocked. Furthermore, any individuals or entities with ownership, directly or indirectly, of 50 per cent or more by the designated persons are also subject to these sanctions.
These measures prohibit transactions involving any property or interests in property of designated or blocked persons unless authorised by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) or exempt. This includes contributions and provision of funds, goods, or services to or from any blocked person.
Moreover, the entry of designated individuals into the United States has been suspended under Presidential Proclamation 8693.
The US government explained that “the integrity of these sanctions lies not only in the ability to designate and add persons to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN), but also in the willingness to remove persons from the list in accordance with the law.”
Following the sanctions, FO spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch issued a statement today saying: “We reject political use of export controls. It is well known that the same jurisdictions, which claim strict adherence to non-proliferation controls, have waived off licensing requirements for advanced military technologies for some countries.”
She added that “such discriminatory approaches and double standards” undermine the credibility of non proliferation regimes and also the objectives of regional and global peace and security by “accentuating military asymmetries”.
Baloch said that such listings of commercial entities took place in the past as well on allegations of links to Pakistan’s ballistic missile programme “without sharing any evidence whatsoever”.
“While we are not aware of the specifics of the latest measures by the United States, in the past we have come across many instances where listings have been made on mere suspicion or even when the involved items were not on any control lists but were deemed sensitive under catch-all provisions,” she said.
Baloch said that Pakistan had pointed out many times the need to avoid “arbitrary application of export controls” and for discussions between concerned parties for an “objective mechanism to avoid erroneous sanctions on technology needed purely for socio-economic development pursuits”.
She concluded that Pakistan was ready to discuss end-use and end-user verification mechanisms so that legitimate commercial users wre not hurt by the “discriminatory application” of export controls.
The US State Department claimed on Friday evening that the entities — three Chinese and one from Belarus — were particularly assisting Pakistan’s long-range missile endeavors.
The statement specified that “the ultimate goal of sanctions is not to punish, but to bring about a positive change in behavior.”
The entities facing sanctions include the Belarus-based Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant, the People’s Republic of China-based Xi’an Longde Technology Development Company Limited, Tianjin Creative Source International Trade Co Ltd and Granpect Company Limited.
As per the sanctions imposed under Executive Order 13382, all property and interests in property of the designated entities that are in the United States or under the control of US persons are now blocked. Furthermore, any individuals or entities with ownership, directly or indirectly, of 50 per cent or more by the designated persons are also subject to these sanctions.
These measures prohibit transactions involving any property or interests in property of designated or blocked persons unless authorised by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) or exempt. This includes contributions and provision of funds, goods, or services to or from any blocked person.
Moreover, the entry of designated individuals into the United States has been suspended under Presidential Proclamation 8693.
The US government explained that “the integrity of these sanctions lies not only in the ability to designate and add persons to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN), but also in the willingness to remove persons from the list in accordance with the law.”
Following the sanctions, FO spokesperson Mumtaz Zahra Baloch issued a statement today saying: “We reject political use of export controls. It is well known that the same jurisdictions, which claim strict adherence to non-proliferation controls, have waived off licensing requirements for advanced military technologies for some countries.”
She added that “such discriminatory approaches and double standards” undermine the credibility of non proliferation regimes and also the objectives of regional and global peace and security by “accentuating military asymmetries”.
Baloch said that such listings of commercial entities took place in the past as well on allegations of links to Pakistan’s ballistic missile programme “without sharing any evidence whatsoever”.
“While we are not aware of the specifics of the latest measures by the United States, in the past we have come across many instances where listings have been made on mere suspicion or even when the involved items were not on any control lists but were deemed sensitive under catch-all provisions,” she said.
Baloch said that Pakistan had pointed out many times the need to avoid “arbitrary application of export controls” and for discussions between concerned parties for an “objective mechanism to avoid erroneous sanctions on technology needed purely for socio-economic development pursuits”.
She concluded that Pakistan was ready to discuss end-use and end-user verification mechanisms so that legitimate commercial users wre not hurt by the “discriminatory application” of export controls.
NGAD IS THE BEST
Elite Member
English dude English, this is international forum not Chinese forum and this thread is for Pakistani BMs not conflict between Israel and Iran
PAKISTANFOREVER
Trusted Member
Can you explain since when did satellites have MIRV technology? Also, a satellite is not a fast moving projectile coming towards you or a given target so not a good analogy to use.
abdulbarijan
Registered Member
Aoa,
Can any informed member compare the Pakistani missile technology with Iranian, or direct me to a post that does so, I remember back in the old forum we had info pool threads for JFT as well as some of our missiles, so another one like those would be much appreciated from informed members.
Regards,
Abj
Can any informed member compare the Pakistani missile technology with Iranian, or direct me to a post that does so, I remember back in the old forum we had info pool threads for JFT as well as some of our missiles, so another one like those would be much appreciated from informed members.
Regards,
Abj
