Unrest in AJK Update and Discussion

Guru jee the massacre was on the opposite side of the LOC. It is well documented.

From the picture that emerges, thousands of Muslim men and women were allegedly massacred in four eastern Jammu districts (of Jammu, Kathua, Udhampur and Chani Jagir) from late September through to early November 1947.

Jammu and Kashmir state troops along with Hindus and Sikhs escaping violence in West Punjab have been accused of these mass killings. Some news reports that Snedden cites claim that 200,000 Muslims were killed and 13,000 Muslim women were abducted. This was before the Pashtun invasion on October 22, 1947, and before Hari Singh’s accession to India on October 26 that year.

The motivation, Snedden posits, was revenge, but also an attempt to change the demography of the state’s Muslim-majority Jammu region. The massacre led to mass exodus of Jammu Muslims to the western parts of Jammu and Kashmir that would soon become to be called Azad Kashmir by Pakistan.


Gurru is trying to change history just like israhell.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Waz
Guru jee the massacre was on the opposite side of the LOC. It is well documented.

From the picture that emerges, thousands of Muslim men and women were allegedly massacred in four eastern Jammu districts (of Jammu, Kathua, Udhampur and Chani Jagir) from late September through to early November 1947.

Jammu and Kashmir state troops along with Hindus and Sikhs escaping violence in West Punjab have been accused of these mass killings. Some news reports that Snedden cites claim that 200,000 Muslims were killed and 13,000 Muslim women were abducted. This was before the Pashtun invasion on October 22, 1947, and before Hari Singh’s accession to India on October 26 that year.

The motivation, Snedden posits, was revenge, but also an attempt to change the demography of the state’s Muslim-majority Jammu region. The massacre led to mass exodus of Jammu Muslims to the western parts of Jammu and Kashmir that would soon become to be called Azad Kashmir by Pakistan.


well there is no mention of this so called massecrre as per indian records or the british ones but must have been a retaliotorry riot of some kind after watching the horrors done against hindus & sikhs in PINDI . Lahore Gunjrawala , Sialkot , Multan and its adjoining areas by muslim mobs

it was really a swage and darkest part of sub continent history all initiated by Muslim leuge and supported by 90% muslims of undivided India for a seppratte homeland and look 76 years later what that obsession has given the masses of Pakistan and Bangladesh though the later is trying to shed its obsessions with that so called two natiion theory but still has ghosts of partition in name of Jamaat e Islaami

Karachi and Lahore were both Hindu Sikh Majority cities and in both there was almost all buissness owned by Hindus and sikhs pre partiotion and post partition almost all hindus & sikhs were either killed or came to india and now look 76 years on at state of buissness and people there ... you guys must be very very proud of partition and what you did with Hindus and sikhs of your nation during partition
 
Last edited:
Gurru is trying to change history just like israhell.
no one can change history but sure in pakistan they have white washed it for what they did to hindus and sikhs in partition inundivided J&K , punjab , multan and sindh & whats now KPK and your thinking we will forget and forgive all that .. ya right ;) :p
 
Good that demands have been met and things are quiet. This could be first of unrest in many more to come unless pakistan really gets control of economy and development. If you are going to keep surviving on IMF, China or SA this will only get worse.

Also if India keeps progressing this could get worse as at the end of the day India is enemy and Pakistani people will compare and contrast just like Cricket.
 
Is kanjar ko dekho:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


LOL Look at his hair. Another ugly boomer. Why are boomers always the problem?
 
well there is no mention of this so called massecrre as per indian records or the british ones but must have been a retaliotorry riot of some kind after watching the horrors done against hindus & sikhs in PINDI . Lahore Gunjrawala , Sialkot , Multan and its adjoining areas by muslim mobs

it was really a swage and darkest part of sub continent history all initiated by Muslim leuge and supported by 90% muslims of undivided India for a seppratte homeland and look 76 years later what that obsession has given the masses of Pakistan and Bangladesh though the later is trying to shed its obsessions with that so called two natiion theory but still has ghosts of partition in name of Jamaat e Islaami

Karachi and Lahore were both Hindu Sikh Majority cities and in both there was almost all buissness owned by Hindus and sikhs pre partiotion and post partition almost all hindus & sikhs were either killed or came to india and now look 76 years on at state of buissness and people there ... you guys must be very very proud of partition and what you did with Hindus and sikhs of your nation during partition

Guru Gandhi jee mentioned the massacres clearly in his own speeches. The massacres were covered up state officials.
Yes Muslim mobs did commit massacres in the regions you mentioned which was horrible and I wish it never happened, but they were in regions far from Kashmir. The Dogra Raj decided to bring partition to Kashmir.
The second paragraph is your opinion.


Guru jee really? Lahore never had a majority Hindu population and this is proved by census held by the British.


In the 1941 census, Lahore had a population of 6,71,659 which became 7,00,000 by 1947, containing 64.5 per cent Muslims, 30 per cent Hindus, 5 per cent Sikhs as well as a small Christian community. If you look at the central parts of the city where the well-heeled lived, a majority Hindu community controlled most of the bazaar economy — in the famous street, Anarkali Bazaar, there being only one shop owned by a Muslim — and dominated the legal and medical professions. The voters of Punjab were united behind the Unionist Party where tribal identity — Jats and Rajputs — rather than religion dominated.


Yes correct the Hindu population was driven out. As was the Muslim population in East Punjab.

As for Karachi this is right, the Hindu population was at 50%.
At the time of independence, the population of the city of Karachi was 51.1% Hindu, 42.3% Muslim, with the remaining 7% primarily Christians (both British and native), Sikhs, Jains, with a small number of Jews.[8]At the time of independence, the population of the city of Karachi was 51.1% Hindu, 42.3% Muslim, with the remaining 7% primarily Christians (both British and native), Sikhs, Jains, with a small number of Jews.[8]
 
no one can change history but sure in pakistan they have white washed it for what they did to hindus and sikhs in partition inundivided J&K , punjab , multan and sindh & whats now KPK and your thinking we will forget and forgive all that .. ya right ;) :p
Who the **** cares, we were and are enemies, that's why it's essential the populations are separated

The same shit over and over again from you clowns,,
 
Guru Gandhi jee mentioned the massacres clearly in his own speeches. The massacres were covered up state officials.
Yes Muslim mobs did commit massacres in the regions you mentioned which was horrible and I wish it never happened, but they were in regions far from Kashmir. The Dogra Raj decided to bring partition to Kashmir.
The second paragraph is your opinion.
Sir with deu respect to Gandhi Jee

he kept quite when muslim killed almost 10000 hindus in kerala in mopala masecerre in early part of 1921-22 against there anger where british decssimated Usmania khaliphet

Gandhi Jee kept quite when muslim mocket Hindu scriptures Like Bhagwat Geeta and Ramayan and wrote articles and spread leaflets in 1930 in all mosques across india heading Krishna teri geeta janai paregi but when Hindus retaliated by writting a book called "rangille rasool" in lahore Gandhi was first one to raise voice against it

Gandhi jee kept quite when Jinna and Shahid shourwardee orchestrated direct action day in calcutta on 16th august 1946 when muslim mobs butecherred hindus in calcutta but came out asking for peace when Hindu butchers retaliated by doing to muslims what muslims were doing to hindus that stopped all demands of making calcutta part of east pakistan

Gandhi jee kept quite when muslim were massecerring hindus in lakhs in Navakhalli but when hindus started doing the same to urdu speaking muslims in Bihar Gandhi ji sat on aamaran anshan/fast onto death

and after partition he himself said if muslim want to kll hindus hindus should not retaliate .... why ... NON VOILENCE dose not means cowerdice and thats why most hindus of new india dont like Gandhi ji and his once sided principle of NON VOILENCE and BHAICHARRA

this is new India and if you slap on one cheep we will break your neck or make your suffering so intence that your genrations wont think of doing what you did in past and there will be no mercy or forgiveness forget about remose
 
Sir with deu respect to Gandhi Jee

he kept quite when muslim killed almost 10000 hindus in kerala in mopala masecerre in early part of 1921-22 against there anger where british decssimated Usmania khaliphet

Gandhi Jee kept quite when muslim mocket Hindu scriptures Like Bhagwat Geeta and Ramayan and wrote articles and spread leaflets in 1930 in all mosques across india heading Krishna teri geeta janai paregi but when Hindus retaliated by writting a book called "rangille rasool" in lahore Gandhi was first one to raise voice against it

Gandhi jee kept quite when Jinna and Shahid shourwardee orchestrated direct action day in calcutta on 16th august 1946 when muslim mobs butecherred hindus in calcutta but came out asking for peace when Hindu butchers retaliated by doing to muslims what muslims were doing to hindus that stopped all demands of making calcutta part of east pakistan

Gandhi jee kept quite when muslim were massecerring hindus in lakhs in Navakhalli but when hindus started doing the same to urdu speaking muslims in Bihar Gandhi ji sat on aamaran anshan/fast onto death

and after partition he himself said if muslim want to kll hindus hindus should not retaliate .... why ... NON VOILENCE dose not means cowerdice and thats why most hindus of new india dont like Gandhi ji and his once sided principle of NON VOILENCE and BHAICHARRA

this is new India and if you slap on one cheep we will break your neck or make your suffering so intence that your genrations wont think of doing what you did in past and there will be no mercy or forgiveness forget about remose

But when China came and beat your soldiers to death and took land you kind of just did nothing but spread fantasy bullshit
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top