The 1,000th F-35 Has Been Built

It has some radar reduction features but it does not reduce a lot beyond company promo.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

You're doing a wrong comparison dude
 
It has some radar reduction features but it does not reduce a lot beyond company promo.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Which have radar reduction features J10C? Or you're talking about J35?
 
Material is important for RCS reduction. Metal has a lot of RCS.
J10C has a carbon composites which reduce weight significantly but not much RCS whereas J35 uses RAM (RADAR ABSORBING MATERIALS) as well as plan-form alignments (stealth shaping)
 
J10C has a carbon composites which reduce weight significantly but not much RCS whereas J35 uses RAM (RADAR ABSORBING MATERIALS) as well as plan-form alignments (stealth shaping)

The shaping doesn't really work. Only material work well. You need plastic to cut down on RCS.
 
The shaping doesn't really work. Only material work well. You need plastic to cut down on RCS.
Lol than why USA/Russia/China/EU and every other country trying to develop based on plan-form alignments (stealth shaping) since decades if stealth is useless lol
 
Lol than why USA/Russia/China/EU and every other country trying to develop based on plan-form alignments (stealth shaping) since decades if stealth is useless lol

It's good for promo but doesn't really work. If you can see it with your eyes, and considering radar wave is light, radar can see it too.
 
It's good for promo but doesn't really work. If you can see it with your eyes, and considering radar wave is light, radar can see it too.
Lol so Lockheed Martin/Boeing/Sukhoi/CAC/SAC/Northrop Grumman etc etc are investing billions in stealth shaping which is useless you're not expert dude shaping is also reduced RCS significantly there is old Russian mathematical formula for RCS reduction
 
Please stay on topic without rambling irrelevance.
Lol so Lockheed Martin/Boeing/Sukhoi/CAC/SAC/Northrop Grumman etc etc are investing billions in stealth shaping which is useless you're not expert dude shaping is also reduced RCS significantly there is old Russian mathematical formula for RCS reduction

It works on paper, but not in reality. Pfizer vaccine was touted as bullet proof and turned out a dippy downer in reality.
 
It works on paper, but not in reality. Pfizer vaccine was touted as bullet proof and turned out a dippy downer in reality.
Yeah yeah you're expert but companies and govts that are investing in stealth shaping are stupid and you're right lol jets makes multiple measures to reduce RCS stealth shaping is one of them, stealth shaping can reduce RCS at various angles such as from head on/ from rear stealth shaping scattered radar waves from various angles
 
Yeah yeah you're expert but companies and govts that are investing in stealth shaping are stupid and you're right lol jets makes multiple measures to reduce RCS stealth shaping is one of them, stealth shaping can reduce RCS at various angles such as from head on/ from rear stealth shaping scattered radar waves from various angles

An interesting thought: what if it works so well that the stealth aircraft are flying without being detected at all.
 
An interesting thought: what if it works so well that the stealth aircraft are flying without being detected at all.
Sir one option is here for cloaking device that's is plasma stealth but problem is plasma device is that its also blocked emitting radar waves,
 
Software issues caused massive delays, and in 2017 Lockheed was scheduled to deliver at least 1,092 aircraft by the end of 2023.
View attachment 9998

It's only because countries want to wait for Block4 instead of buying Block3.

This includes new hardware including faster processors.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top