White and Green with M/S
Elite Member
- Oct 29, 2020
- 10,135
- 3,971
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
It has some radar reduction features but it does not reduce a lot beyond company promo.
You're doing a wrong comparison dude
It has some radar reduction features but it does not reduce a lot beyond company promo.
Production rate still lags F-16. In total, some 4,000 F-16 were built.
It has some radar reduction features but it does not reduce a lot beyond company promo.
Which have radar reduction features J10C? Or you're talking about J35?
J10C has a carbon composites which reduce weight significantly but not much RCS whereas J35 uses RAM (RADAR ABSORBING MATERIALS) as well as plan-form alignments (stealth shaping)Material is important for RCS reduction. Metal has a lot of RCS.
J10C has a carbon composites which reduce weight significantly but not much RCS whereas J35 uses RAM (RADAR ABSORBING MATERIALS) as well as plan-form alignments (stealth shaping)
Lol than why USA/Russia/China/EU and every other country trying to develop based on plan-form alignments (stealth shaping) since decades if stealth is useless lolThe shaping doesn't really work. Only material work well. You need plastic to cut down on RCS.
Lol than why USA/Russia/China/EU and every other country trying to develop based on plan-form alignments (stealth shaping) since decades if stealth is useless lol
Lol so Lockheed Martin/Boeing/Sukhoi/CAC/SAC/Northrop Grumman etc etc are investing billions in stealth shaping which is useless you're not expert dude shaping is also reduced RCS significantly there is old Russian mathematical formula for RCS reductionIt's good for promo but doesn't really work. If you can see it with your eyes, and considering radar wave is light, radar can see it too.
Lol so Lockheed Martin/Boeing/Sukhoi/CAC/SAC/Northrop Grumman etc etc are investing billions in stealth shaping which is useless you're not expert dude shaping is also reduced RCS significantly there is old Russian mathematical formula for RCS reduction
Yeah yeah you're expert but companies and govts that are investing in stealth shaping are stupid and you're right lol jets makes multiple measures to reduce RCS stealth shaping is one of them, stealth shaping can reduce RCS at various angles such as from head on/ from rear stealth shaping scattered radar waves from various anglesIt works on paper, but not in reality. Pfizer vaccine was touted as bullet proof and turned out a dippy downer in reality.
Yeah yeah you're expert but companies and govts that are investing in stealth shaping are stupid and you're right lol jets makes multiple measures to reduce RCS stealth shaping is one of them, stealth shaping can reduce RCS at various angles such as from head on/ from rear stealth shaping scattered radar waves from various angles
Sir one option is here for cloaking device that's is plasma stealth but problem is plasma device is that its also blocked emitting radar waves,An interesting thought: what if it works so well that the stealth aircraft are flying without being detected at all.
Very high speeds can generate a plasma at least around the leading edges and points of an aircraft.Sir one option is here for cloaking device that's is plasma stealth but problem is plasma device is that its also blocked emitting radar waves,
Software issues caused massive delays, and in 2017 Lockheed was scheduled to deliver at least 1,092 aircraft by the end of 2023.
View attachment 9998