Will it be controversial if I say, its Zoroastrianism that split away from Hinduism? Maybe power struggle or something Doc?
Not remotely controversial.
There is only a single lobby in the world that pushes this narrative.
And it is resident in India (with European lackeys).
The Iranian side is under the Mullas. Who obviously do not care, and of course fear any form of reignited love for Zoroastrianism among the people.
Most everyone else in the world, serious historians, scholars, believe it is the opposite.
And while Parsis are living custodians of the ancient fire and wisdom, passed down from father to son, an unbroken link, we are too small a lobby and too vested and interested to really matter. Though there is a big institute of Zoroastrian Studies in the UK, that I work with in a certain capacity over the years. But few Parsis. Many Iranians. And majority, including the department heads, gora scholars.
The Germans too are big on Zoroastrian research. From before, through, and after the Hitler era.
Look at the flow of people.
And look at the Indian people today.
Do you seriously believe we are all the same race and ethnicity?
Cheers, Doc