Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Fab-9000 vs Khorramshahr-4:

Screenshot 2024-10-02 at 23.29.59.png
 
with every subsequent wave we will see lower interception rate by Israel. wave 5 onwards in particular will be devastating.

wave 1 (April 13): 120 missiles fired --> 9 impacts
wave 2 (October 1): 180-200 missiles fired --> 40-50 impacts
wave 3: TBC

Israel doesn't have a large number of ABM interceptors. They are very large and very expensive. Israel will try to inflict huge damage on Iran using its air force (F-35 and Air Lora are potent) before we reach wave 5.

to ensure total depletion of Israeli ABM, Iran should concentrate salvos of missiles at very high value targets (Mossad HQ, Tel Aviv military buildings) forcing Israel to intercept them. it might mean fewer missiles go through but it will pay dividends in subsequent waves. ensuring sufficient accuracy is an issue. but if Israel starts attacking civilian targets then Iran can do the same and accuracy is no longer a concern...

but it is unlikely that Israel will be able to launch pre-emptive strikes on Iranian missile launchers given the distance between Iran and Israel. and Iran's missile bases are very hard to hit, deep under mountains and spread across Iran. perhaps they will hit the entrances but that will cause temporary damage only.
 
Last edited:
A Brit Journalist calling out an Israeli minister; the Israeli didn’t like the arrogant line of questioning. Game recognize game.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


This past year has brought the world to the point where it expects Iran to have a nuke considering what it’s up against.
 
Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Fab-9000 vs Khorramshahr-4:

View attachment 69143
Click to expand...

It wasn't a FAB-9000, it was misinfo. Russians dropped the ODAB-1500 UMPK glibe thermobaric bomb, through a Su34. Devastating seeing the Vovchansk clip.
 
Persian Gulf said:
with every subsequent wave we will see lower interception rate by Israel. wave 5 onwards in particular will be devastating.

wave 1 (April 13): 120 missiles fired --> 9 impacts
wave 2 (October 1): 180-200 missiles fired --> 40-50 impacts
wave 3: TBC

Israel doesn't have a large number of ABM interceptors. They are very large and very expensive. Israel will try to inflict huge damage on Iran using its air force (F-35 and Air Lora are potent) before we reach wave 5.

to ensure total depletion of Israeli ABM, Iran should concentrate salvos of missiles at very high value targets (Mossad HQ, Tel Aviv military buildings) forcing Israel to intercept them. it might mean fewer missiles go through but it will pay dividends in subsequent waves. ensuring sufficient accuracy is an issue. but if Israel starts attacking civilian targets then Iran can do the same and accuracy is no longer a concern...

but it is unlikely that Israel will be able to launch pre-emptive strikes on Iranian missile launchers given the distance between Iran and Israel. and Iran's missile bases are very hard to hit, deep under mountains and spread across Iran. perhaps they will hit the entrances but that will cause temporary damage only.
Click to expand...

Because of the zionists desperate situation they could also look to using nukes. Iran might be underestimating their willingness to use everything they have. "Wave 5" may or may not arrive.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Mehdipersian said:
Israel is a small country. All their infrastructure and cities will be easily targeted by Iran and the cowardly Jews will quickly take the first flight to their real countries.
Click to expand...
Ignore.
 
Persian Gulf said:
with every subsequent wave we will see lower interception rate by Israel. wave 5 onwards in particular will be devastating.

wave 1 (April 13): 120 missiles fired --> 9 impacts
wave 2 (October 1): 180-200 missiles fired --> 40-50 impacts
wave 3: TBC

Israel doesn't have a large number of ABM interceptors. They are very large and very expensive. Israel will try to inflict huge damage on Iran using its air force (F-35 and Air Lora are potent) before we reach wave 5.

to ensure total depletion of Israeli ABM, Iran should concentrate salvos of missiles at very high value targets (Mossad HQ, Tel Aviv military buildings) forcing Israel to intercept them. it might mean fewer missiles go through but it will pay dividends in subsequent waves. ensuring sufficient accuracy is an issue. but if Israel starts attacking civilian targets then Iran can do the same and accuracy is no longer a concern...

but it is unlikely that Israel will be able to launch pre-emptive strikes on Iranian missile launchers given the distance between Iran and Israel. and Iran's missile bases are very hard to hit, deep under mountains and spread across Iran. perhaps they will hit the entrances but that will cause temporary damage only.
Click to expand...
Also note, Iran is depleting (and purportedly replacing) OLD systems. The good candy has not been used en masse. I don't know whether to categorize Fattah-1s as 'old' or 'new'.
 
Beautiful. I believe this is being viewed under 'Jordan'ian skies:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Do Chinese or Russians don't have enough imaging satelites to take a pic when they happen to be over Israel ? They could've helped busting any disinformation.
 
Cryptonian said:
Do Chinese or Russians don't have enough imaging satelites to take a pic when they happen to be over Israel ? They could've helped busting any disinformation.
Click to expand...

They do and they did.

Their job isn’t ‘disinformation busting’. They provide commercial imagery to the buyer (Iranian military) who then uses it for post strike battlefield assessment.
 
Persian Gulf said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Fab-9000 vs Khorramshahr-4:

View attachment 69143
Click to expand...


Simple calculation but probably not accurate.

You are not factoring in bounce detonation (warhead bounces off ground then detonates) vs dirt impact Detonation. In case of dirt (ground) impact, the KE is reduced depending on how deep the warhead burrows before detonating as the earth absorbs more and more of the KE the deeper it goes before detonation.
 
jauk said:
Beautiful. I believe this is being viewed under 'Jordan'ian skies:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Pinpoint? Certainly not with the satellite imagery and video we’ve seen.

During the opening 24-48 hours of the 2003 Iraq invasion, the US launched more than 500 cruise missiles and 1,700+ air sorties.
 
F-22Raptor said:
Pinpoint? Certainly not with the satellite imagery and video we’ve seen.

During the opening 24-48 hours of the 2003 Iraq invasion, the US launched more than 500 cruise missiles and 1,700+ air sorties.
Click to expand...

2003 was 21 years ago. Iraq wasn’t GPS jamming, Iraqi military barely even existed by the time of invasion.

Do a simple google search where even the US admits that Russian GPS jamming on Ukraine frontlines is throwing off the accuracy of many PGM/Guided Rocket provided to Ukrainian forces by the West.

So if you think those same CMs today can achieve <5 meter accuracy in a GPS jammed/heavy ECW environment then I got a bridge to sell you made of gold.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 1, guests: 2)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top