Iranian Missiles | News and Discussions

Beautiful. I believe this is being viewed under 'Jordan'ian skies:

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

I counted around 60 missiles. no where near the claims of 180-400. This makes me think that the 90% hit claim is an accurate figure from all the Impact videos we have seen.
 
2003 was 21 years ago. Iraq wasn’t GPS jamming, Iraqi military barely even existed by the time of invasion.

Do a simple google search where even the US admits that Russian GPS jamming on Ukraine frontlines is throwing off the accuracy of many PGM/Guided Rocket provided to Ukrainian forces by the West.

So if you think those same CMs today can achieve <5 meter accuracy in a GPS jammed/heavy ECW environment then I got a bridge to sell you made of gold.

Both Tomahawk and JASSMs are designed to penetrate through heavily degraded EW environments.

GMLRs have destroyed thousands of Russian targets. JDAM-ERs have been equipped with radar seekers to target GPS jammers. Both are still achieving 70% effect on target. SDBs 90%.

The US also has much more advanced EW attack and counter EW capabilities than Ukraine and will never share those with them.
 
Both Tomahawk and JASSMs are designed to penetrate through heavily degraded EW environments.

GMLRs have destroyed thousands of Russian targets. JDAM-ERs have been equipped with radar seekers to target GPS jammers. Both are still achieving 70% effect on target. SDBs 90%.

The US also has much more advanced EW attack and counter EW capabilities than Ukraine and will never share those with them.







Whatever you say bro…
 
I counted around 60 missiles. no where near the claims of 180-400. This makes me think that the 90% hit claim is an accurate figure from all the Impact videos we have seen.
I agree. Yet Salami clearly said 200. Although Sepah's notice declared 10s.
 
Clear video of the failure of Israel's defense against Iranian missiles
In a new video of Iran's missile operation, it is clear that about 10-11 Israeli defense missiles are in the sky and they are being fired, but they cannot hit even one Iranian missile and the Iranian missiles easily pass by them.
 






Whatever you say bro…

I’ve read all of them previously, and HIMARs has still destroyed thousands of targets at near 70% effect. At 10,000 rockets delivered that’s 7,000 targets hit.

And the US is currently producing 1,167 GMLRs rockets per MONTH. That will increase to 1,500 per month over the next year or two. The US will have no issue delivering a steady supply of GMLRS to Ukraine.

The only weapon Russian EW has had significant effects on are Excalibur shells, but the US stopped delivering those 2 years ago.
 
with every subsequent wave we will see lower interception rate by Israel. wave 5 onwards in particular will be devastating.

wave 1 (April 13): 120 missiles fired --> 9 impacts
wave 2 (October 1): 180-200 missiles fired --> 40-50 impacts
wave 3: TBC

Israel doesn't have a large number of ABM interceptors. They are very large and very expensive. Israel will try to inflict huge damage on Iran using its air force (F-35 and Air Lora are potent) before we reach wave 5.

to ensure total depletion of Israeli ABM, Iran should concentrate salvos of missiles at very high value targets (Mossad HQ, Tel Aviv military buildings) forcing Israel to intercept them. it might mean fewer missiles go through but it will pay dividends in subsequent waves. ensuring sufficient accuracy is an issue. but if Israel starts attacking civilian targets then Iran can do the same and accuracy is no longer a concern...

but it is unlikely that Israel will be able to launch pre-emptive strikes on Iranian missile launchers given the distance between Iran and Israel. and Iran's missile bases are very hard to hit, deep under mountains and spread across Iran. perhaps they will hit the entrances but that will cause temporary damage only.

You think the upgraded version of Bavar-373 with Sayad 4b missiles could effectively confront Israeli F35?
Maybe not entirely obviously, but complicate their mission and thereby limit the scope of the damages.
 
You think the upgraded version of Bavar-373 with Sayad 4b missiles could effectively confront Israeli F35?
Maybe not entirely obviously, but complicate their mission and thereby limit the scope of the damages.
F-35 will not enter Iranian airspace, they will launch air lora from 400-600km away from the target

Bavar-373 effective range against F-35 is probably not more than 50-80km
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


good footage of the missiles being transported from underground bases and fired
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


32 hits on Nevatim. I count maybe 9 accurate/semi-accurate hits.

we should accept that we cannot put these airbases out of operation with current missiles (too inaccurate, not powerful enough, airbases too big and difficult to put out of operation for any extended period of time anyway which makes trying not worth the effort)
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


32 hits on Nevatim. I count maybe 9 accurate/semi-accurate hits.

we should accept that we cannot put these airbases out of operation with current missiles (too inaccurate, not powerful enough, airbases too big and difficult to put out of operation for any extended period of time anyway which makes trying not worth the effort)

Well I’m guessing with every round iran is learning 200 hundred directed at the base next time no advance silly warnings also can I give a little advice day time attack have Hezbollah muster up large attack and let iran come in from the back
 
[

we should accept that we cannot put these airbases out of operation with current missiles (too inaccurate, not powerful enough, airbases too big and difficult to put out of operation for any extended period of time anyway which makes trying not worth the effort)

There is no such thing as missiles ‘powerful enough’ to destroy something as ginormous as these air bases with a few strikes. Nuclear weapons would get the job done but if you want to use conventional warheads you will have to spend dozens and dozens or so missile strikes on such a base to reliably take it out of commission. This is something that has always been known and Iran would have prepared enough stockpile for these large airbases.

In terms of accuracy, how are you coming to the conclusion these missiles are not accurate? You can literally see strikes on hangers and middle of runway etc a simple understanding of CEP and statistics would demonstrate how accurate these missile have to be to achieve this. Unless obvious, it can be hard to do a proper assessment because you’d need to know exactly what Iran was targeting to know whether it missed or not. Seems to me Iran did use some older liquid fuelled missile which have a larger CEPs compared to like KS1/2 so naturally you will see missiles miss the mark.

The fact Iran can hit a spot like a runway from at least 1100km away with a ballistic missile is truly incredible. No other nation has come even close to demonstrate this level of ballistic missile capability in a real time strike.

Truly incredible.

What this strike showed was this: Israel could not even stop a barrage consisting of MAX 200 missiles( in reality probably lower). But even if the 200 figure is accurate, this is nothing to Iran. If Iran wanted to strike Israel with the intention to properly harm, the devastation on Israel would be extreme. Irans coventional ballistic missile power is so much that Israel’s only true deterrence is their nuclear option.

Now if Iran develops a powerful airforce to supplement this incredible missile , uav and air defence then what a potent military it will become.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top