India and China reach agreement on border patrolling along LAC

Status
Not open for further replies.
a commitment not to support any terrorist or separatist activities that harm China.
You realise, along with other brothers of yours on the Net, that this does not apply to the Free Tibetan government?

They have always been allowed to remain in peace, without any overt martial activity against the Chinese occupation forces in Tibet, and whenever they sought to demonstrate, on occasions when important Chinese delegates visited New Delhi, for example, they have been restrained by local police.

There is no clear reason to compromise this, and it is most unlikely that there has been a compromise on this.
 
You realise, along with other brothers of yours on the Net, that this does not apply to the Free Tibetan government?

They have always been allowed to remain in peace, without any overt martial activity against the Chinese occupation forces in Tibet, and whenever they sought to demonstrate, on occasions when important Chinese delegates visited New Delhi, for example, they have been restrained by local police.

There is no clear reason to compromise this, and it is most unlikely that there has been a compromise on this.
When shouting slogans, first ask the Indian government to overturn the official announcement signed by itself. On June 23, 2003, our Prime Minister and the Prime Minister of India signed the Declaration on Principles of the Relationship between the People's Republic of China and the Republic of India and Comprehensive Cooperation in the Great Hall of the People. In the declaration, India recognizes that the XZ Autonomous Region is part of China's territory and reiterates that Xz is not allowed to engage in political activities against China in India.Screenshot_20241022_153321_Samsung Internet.jpgScreenshot_20241022_153321_Samsung Internet.jpg
 
Another almost-human fly - same wall?

You need a HAZMAT SUIT 😂

I think PLA has been worn down by Ladakh Winter and Mountainous terrain

This agreement is just announced before Onset of Winter ie month of November
 
I'm just curious.

Where did you get this wealth of information? None of the official releases - mainly from the Indian side - had any reference to new rules, or to China setting new rules.

Do you have the ability to cling to the wall and listen in to conversations of this sort, or did you wake up with a headache and a hangover and decide to clear your throat with that post?

For a moderator, you always get butt-hurt when your India is spoken about negatively, even factually.
 
You realise, along with other brothers of yours on the Net, that this does not apply to the Free Tibetan government?

They have always been allowed to remain in peace, without any overt martial activity against the Chinese occupation forces in Tibet, and whenever they sought to demonstrate, on occasions when important Chinese delegates visited New Delhi, for example, they have been restrained by local police.

There is no clear reason to compromise this, and it is most unlikely that there has been a compromise on this.

This is the way Indian police allowed XZ to march on August 30, 2019Screenshot_20241022_154437_Baidu.jpg
 
You realise, along with other brothers of yours on the Net, that this does not apply to the Free Tibetan government?

They have always been allowed to remain in peace, without any overt martial activity against the Chinese occupation forces in Tibet, and whenever they sought to demonstrate, on occasions when important Chinese delegates visited New Delhi, for example, they have been restrained by local police.

There is no clear reason to compromise this, and it is most unlikely that there has been a compromise on this.

India and China should have created a buffer zone decades ago. It could have solved the problem and built trust, a neutral no man's land that none shall trepass. I have had Indian neighbors and trust me, they aren't the most considerate people.
 
India and China should have created a buffer zone decades ago. It could have solved the problem and built trust, a neutral no man's land that none shall trepass. I have had Indian neighbors and trust me, they aren't the most considerate people.
I have had Indian neighbours tool, and surprise, surprise! Not the most considerate people.

To be honest, I believe the PRC should never have occupied Tibet, it was meant to be a buffer zone, and there was a flourishing trans-Himalayan trade, down into (for instance - you might like to look them up on the map to see the ease of access) Sikkim and Kalimpong from Xigatse and other points.

But we will quarrel if I continue, so let me just agree with you, and leave it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top