Iranian Foreign & Resistance Front Strategy & Operations

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The Israeli attack on Iran was a great gift for Iran:

A) it demonstrated what holes Iran still needs to plug and made the urgency of that effort increase exponentially

B) potentially increasing Iran’s military budget by 200% in coming year, which should help get more weapon systems funded and built

C) Proved that air defense alone cannot be relied on to protect Iranian soil. Hopefully that puts a sense of urgency on SU-35 procurement and revive Sofreh Mahi project.

D) Weakened the forces within the Republic that tried to downplay Israeli/Us threats to Iranian soil or attempts to weaken the armed forces by withholding funding
 
Immortals said:
The Israeli attack on Iran was a great gift for Iran:

A) it demonstrated what holes Iran still needs to plug and made the urgency of that effort increase exponentially

B) potentially increasing Iran’s military budget by 200% in coming year, which should help get more weapon systems funded and built

C) Proved that air defense alone cannot be relied on to protect Iranian soil. Hopefully that puts a sense of urgency on SU-35 procurement and revive Sofreh Mahi project.

D) Weakened the forces within the Republic that tried to downplay Israeli/Us threats to Iranian soil or attempts to weaken the armed forces by withholding funding
Click to expand...
Do these same points also apply for Israel?
 
tsunset said:
Do these same points also apply for Israel?
Click to expand...

No.

Because Iranian BMs will only become more lethal as Iran transitions to faster more stealthier missiles (True HGVs like Fatah-2 and its successors and glide RVs like keiybar Shekan).

Operation True Promise 1 - 3 has provided Iranian engineers with immense post strike data and real time battlefield intel for building the next generation BM families. Prior to this, Iran’s battlefield data was limited to the Al Assad attack (which was a defenseless air base) and theoretical simulations/war games.

The economics of interceptors don’t favor Israel either as there is no future tech that can shoot down a BM warhead at a reasonable cost. Production rates are also very slow (a couple hundred a year). Thus Iran will still be able to threaten Israel for foreseeable future.

So while Israel can ask for THAAD deployment and speed up Arrow-4 development, it cannot handle an extended BM salvo from Iran. Thus it cannot “plug” its holes with any reasonable fixes.

In a war of attrition, the economics [of warfare] favor Iran for now.
 
Why do they always fire one ATM, not multiple? Why do they always film Satanists retrieving their dead and wounded and not attacking the Satanists?
 
tsunset said:
Do these same points also apply for Israel?
Click to expand...
Israel is proving zero flexibility for adapting and learning from any of their experiences... Iran is always learning from the own mistakes....during lowest period of the country, revolution inside and assaults by Sadam's Arabian coalition, facing serious force they had to strike back by force on their own, organizing themselves in the specific conditions.
Similar approach is going on with the ongoing struggle....
 
FUB said:
Why do they always fire one ATM, not multiple? Why do they always film Satanists retrieving their dead and wounded and not attacking the Satanists?
Click to expand...
Because they are not you!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 11 (members: 0, guests: 11)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top