Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

Netanyahu: The Arab world made concessions to us and now Iran is the one that wants to destroy us.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


It's part of his games to pit others against each other and play Master in the region.

Nobody made concessions to him except a despot regime in Bahrain. Even UAE is distancing itself from Israel.

Jewish narcissism is very extreme and they view non-Jews as tools and slaves to them and will never view them as fellow human beings that they should coexist with. They can't do that. So they'll always talk in director mode. Until they're crushed and that narcissism is beaten out of their DNA.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

They are going to topple IRI using ALBMs pushed to their maximum range with quadcopters? And that Iran will just sit there and surrender? What kind of delusion is that
 
They are going to topple IRI using ALBMs pushed to their maximum range with quadcopters? And that Iran will just sit there and surrender? What kind of delusion is that

They're not actually going to do anything. Netanyahu is not stupid and refuses any directive to go after Iran. It would be more like attack nuclear sites, commit terror attacks on ground via terror cells. And then incite the population of Iran through Western media to go out and topple the regime.

It would fail miserably so Netanyahu will not embark on it.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Then the Iranian response should be devastating enough to take out all of Israel's economic centers and nodes of military production that the strategic damage would be so high that Israel feels forced to use nuclear weapons in response.

Sure, Iran might suffer a bit if nukes are fired, but it will give Iran a pretext to quickly amass a stockpile of nukes and hit back.

At this point, rather than just let Iran's enemies destroy the economy and topple the leaders, it's time to be as brave as Putin.

After all, if anything happens it won't be Iran that uses the N first, but the crazy Israelis that can't handle the heat and bombardments when they are the ones getting fukked up real good like they did to Gaza and Lebanon.
 
It's part of his games to pit others against each other and play Master in the region.

Nobody made concessions to him except a despot regime in Bahrain. Even UAE is distancing itself from Israel.

Jewish narcissism is very extreme and they view non-Jews as tools and slaves to them and will never view them as fellow human beings that they should coexist with. They can't do that. So they'll always talk in director mode. Until they're crushed and that narcissism is beaten out of their DNA.
I don't agree

the Abraham Accords Arabs all made necessary concessions (recognition) with nothing in return

Egypt and Jordan were the original Arab states to surrender to Israel and that marked the end across the region because if the neighbours of Palestine have given up, why should the other Arab nations further away still make sacrifices?

not arming the Palestinian resistance is in itself a concession to Israel, so by that metric they have all conceded to Israel already
 
They are going to topple IRI using ALBMs pushed to their maximum range with quadcopters? And that Iran will just sit there and surrender? What kind of delusion is that
Reading between the lines yahu wants to create crippling economic pain for Iranians so they rise up against their government. His strategy is to try and do a Syria in Iran where infighting will weaken the country. The ALBMs will target oil, power, economic infrastructure to create this hardship. The other goal will be to push back Irans nuclear and missile programs.

This is why lack of a response for TP3 is very bad, yahu and trump will be more emboldened by it. They are sensing Iranian concern and hesitancy to respond, its a pattern we have seen with deaths of so many Iranians and IRGC personnel.
 
Reading between the lines yahu wants to create crippling economic pain for Iranians so they rise up against their government. His strategy is to try and do a Syria in Iran where infighting will weaken the country. The ALBMs will target oil, power, economic infrastructure to create this hardship. The other goal will be to push back Irans nuclear and missile programs.

This is why lack of a response for TP3 is very bad, yahu and trump will be more emboldened by it. They are sensing Iranian concern and hesitancy to respond, its a pattern we have seen with deaths of so many Iranians and IRGC personnel.
I agree but I also invite you to read posts 1-3 of the below:

 
I agree but I also invite you to read posts 1-3 of the below:

I hope Iran is preparing for the worst, remember Yahu is not sane. His a mad racist supremist with support from a super power and a very strong military. In his delusion he thinks his actions are holy and correct.
 
I hope Iran is preparing for the worst, remember Yahu is not sane. His a mad racist supremist with support from a super power and a very strong military. In his delusion he thinks his actions are holy and correct.
in theory even with low CEP (100-200m) Iran can hit all of Israel's power stations and desalination plants assuming (1) political will exists to give that order and (2) Iran has sufficient number of MRBMs to carry out the operation repeatedly (accounting for attrition and missiles lost to enemy strikes)
 
I don't agree

the Abraham Accords Arabs all made necessary concessions (recognition) with nothing in return
Abraham Accords is between Israel, UAE and Bahrain. UAE and Bahrain are not considered Arab majority by any stretch of the imagination.

Arabs states aren't going to fight wars at the moment. The Arab position is no normalization nor recognition of Israel without a two state solution. That hasn't changed.

Netanyahu is a extremist hell bent on remaining in power at any cost. And he'll try to manipulate the scene with these statements. They aren't true. It's his attempt and trying to kill off the two state solution and Arabs don't need to repeat themselves each time he tries that.
Egypt and Jordan were the original Arab states to surrender to Israel and that marked the end across the region because if the neighbours of Palestine have given up, why should the other Arab nations further away still make sacrifices?
Egypt and Jordan fought real wars. Real conventional large scale wars. Arabs don't engage in proxy warfare and/or asymmetric warfare type. They won't go in with military force unless it's for the real deal and to achieve a strategic objective.

Iran has to resort to supporting asymmetric movements/factions across the region because it doesn't have an alternative right now to keep threats away from its border/homeland.

Iran had understandings with the US too, or at times cooperated with it. It's unrealistic to expect Arab states to pretend like US doesn't exist. But they should use their influence to get the US to end the onslaught on Gaza.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


not arming the Palestinian resistance is in itself a concession to Israel, so by that metric they have all conceded to Israel already
They have been involved in arming of Palestinains. But this recent conflict shows Palestinians cannot solve this strategic dilemma. Only regional powers can.
 
Abraham Accords is between Israel, UAE and Bahrain. UAE and Bahrain are not considered Arab majority by any stretch of the imagination.

Arabs states aren't going to fight wars at the moment. The Arab position is no normalization nor recognition of Israel without a two state solution. That hasn't changed.
You just gave an example of where that has changed. How are UAE and Bahrain not Arab countries?

Egypt and Jordan fought real wars. Real conventional large scale wars. Arabs don't engage in proxy warfare and/or asymmetric warfare type. They won't go in with military force unless it's for the real deal and to achieve a strategic objective.
They did. No doubt. But that was 40-50+ years ago. They lost the wars and decided to make peace and normalise and recognise Israel without a two state solution (the concessions in question).

Iran has to resort to supporting asymmetric movements/factions across the region because it doesn't have an alternative right now to keep threats away from its border/homeland.
Mainly because of the distance involved. Can't fight a direct conventional war (a 'real' war as you call it) with 1200km of other countries between us. You also should not ignore the very sincere ideological support for Palestinians and Hezbollah among religious Iranians (I should add, this is despite the ideological hatred a lot of Palestinians have for Iran due to their love of Saddam Hussein).

Iran had understandings with the US too, or at times cooperated with it. It's unrealistic to expect Arab states to pretend like US doesn't exist. But they should use their influence to get the US to end the onslaught on Gaza.
Ahmadinejad is not a good source. He says a lot of weird shit. It's well known that Iran was responsible for 600+ US deaths in Iraq. Even if had some limited cooperation in Iraq (against Saddam who invaded us) and Afghanistan (against the Taliban who murdered our diplomats in 1988) it was not much and it ended in 2003 (with the 'Axis of Evil' speech). But we do not recognise Israel, which is the main point here.

They have been involved in arming of Palestinains. But this recent conflict shows Palestinians cannot solve this strategic dilemma. Only regional powers can.
Egypt and Jordan and Saudi have been involved in arming of Palestinians? This is not true. They hate Hamas. At best Egypt and Jordan turn a limited blind eye to a small amount of weapons smuggling. At best.
 
when they finish with Yemen and cripple their milititary offensive capabilities Iran is next.
You do not trust your enemy enough when they said they will reshape middle east.
Whaaat?

The west had 40+ years to knock out Iran and they didn't and couldn't, but they need to first knock the Yemeni houthis out today to succesfully knock Iran out?
Do you hear this backward logic?? Damn bro, what happened to your posts? You usually post good posts but you're posts these days are not it.
 
I don't believe anything is imminent for Iran, but the Houthis have been tugging the tiger's tail for a while and may find out that their luck has run out. A gambler will always be ruined.
So how could US and NATO that got beaten by ragtag taliban(using simpler weapons) in Afghanistan after 20yrs now defeat houthis who are as tough as the taliban, have similar mountainous terrain and receive much better help from Iran today? US and nato are also scared to deploy boots in Yemen.

You are a dreamer who is just afraid. Your statements here don't make sense,respectfully.
 
So how could US and NATO that got beaten by ragtag taliban(using simpler weapons) in Afghanistan after 20yrs now defeat houthis who are as tough as the taliban, have similar mountainous terrain and receive much better help from Iran today? US and nato are also scared to deploy boots in Yemen.

You are a dreamer who is just afraid. Your statements here don't make sense,respectfully.
Taliban was using ultra-low tech: suicide bombers and IEDs because Afghan and NATO troops were on ground. Houthis are using ballistic missiles since Israel is 2000 KM away. If Israel can systematically take out missile facilities, it will be much harder for Houthis. Ballistic missiles are much harder than suicide bombers and IEDs to hide.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top