warhead must have failed but even a failed warhead impacting at mach 3-5+ should produce a bigger impact than that
Lol .what is nuclear building?stop spreading shitty western propaganda
if you recall Israel stole Iran's entire nuclear archive and that proved Iran used that building to make high purity PETN plastic explosives
So you think Rubio went to Israel to just have a tea with Bibi, because he is such nice person.
One is a hardened Building while the other is not. There is no way of knowing what the condition is inside that F-35 shelter is by just looking at the impact point on the roof.
with that tiny impact I think we can guess
did I do this or did I seek to discuss how Israel was able to carry out such an effective strike?
less than 20 targets hit (precisely and with great destruction) is impressive? how many targets did Iran hit in Israel with this level of precision and destruction?
Iran is not Israel, Iran does not get billions of dollars worth of top of the line U.S weapons and technology for its own domestic projects. The Missiles Iran fired were domestic products developed with a fraction of what Israel and the U.S spend on their combined defense spending. Israel did manage to accurately hit >20 targets. From what I have seen from the Satellite images released so far, many of the targets hit did not appear to have sustained heavy damage. The Blue Sparrow/Rocks missiles used by the IAF, although very accurate, had small warheads. Most of the targets like the Solid fuel mixer buildings did not show signs of secondary explosions. As far as Israeli capabilities are concerned the attack comprising of up to 140 aircraft was underwhelming.
