Khorasan Black Flags
Trusted Member
- Thread starter
- #4,306
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes, but that isn't leaving the NPT. It's violating the NPT. As soon as Iran does that, they will understand that Iran wants to build the bomb and Iran's case will be immediately referred to the UN Security Council.in practice iran can withdraw and kick out IAEA inspectors immediately
LMAO That's exactly what he and I said. It clearly shows you don't understand Article 37.On the Veto in the Security Council
- "Vote does not need unanimous approval... cannot be vetoed" → Incorrect.
- Snapback is only automatic if no opposing resolution is passed by the Security Council within 30 days.
- In practice, any permanent member (U.S., Russia, China, etc.) can block sanctions reinstatement by proposing an opposing resolution (which would need to be rejected for snapback to proceed).
They have several other military bases around us, other than Diego Garcia. Some of them are far bigger threats to us than Diego Garcia.Hope Iran obliterates Diego Garcia to oblivion if they dare attack Iran.
Its peace time, besides if its the Cobra v8 system its mobile so they would be stupid to keep it too long in one place.So they are giving their location away and making it easy for HARMs.
We have been hearing for decades on Iran building a nuclear bomb, if the government of Iran wanted to they could have done it. Back in 2005 breaking news was Pakistan nuclear scientist sold Iran technology for the bomb.
![]()
Pakistan admits nuclear expert traded with Iran
The Pakistani information minister admitted today that Abdul Qadeer Khan, the father of Pakistan's nuclear programme, gave nuclear technology to Iran, but insisted the government knew nothing of the transaction.www.theguardian.com
![]()
Pakistani generals 'helped sell nuclear secrets'
• North Korea paid senior figures $3.5m, letter claims• AQ Khan 'wants to set the historical record straight'www.theguardian.com
If after 20 years Iran still not had built the bomb then they are in big trouble. Iran either needs to build the bomb to protect its self from Nato invasion or change their policy and become friendly, but even that will not end well for Iran, learning from Libya and Iraq, both nations destroyed their weapons and ended up being bombed, the West wants regime change in Iran, they will never back away, what threat was Gaddafi or Bashar Al Assad to the west, they both had weak militaries but still got bombed and regimes changed.
Its not people or people here saying that, the "2 weeks away" meme comes from western media fearmongering campaignsFor almost 30 Years now, Every time people talk about Irans nuclear weapons program, they always say “ Iran is two weeks away” from developing a nuclear weapon.
Not really, Iran is working on them since 1980's - 1990's and Iran has many secret weapons to trash any invaderWe have been hearing for decades on Iran building a nuclear bomb, if the government of Iran wanted to they could have done it. Back in 2005 breaking news was Pakistan nuclear scientist sold Iran technology for the bomb.
![]()
Pakistan admits nuclear expert traded with Iran
The Pakistani information minister admitted today that Abdul Qadeer Khan, the father of Pakistan's nuclear programme, gave nuclear technology to Iran, but insisted the government knew nothing of the transaction.www.theguardian.com
![]()
Pakistani generals 'helped sell nuclear secrets'
• North Korea paid senior figures $3.5m, letter claims• AQ Khan 'wants to set the historical record straight'www.theguardian.com
If after 20 years Iran still not had built the bomb then they are in big trouble. Iran either needs to build the bomb to protect its self from Nato invasion or change their policy and become friendly, but even that will not end well for Iran, learning from Libya and Iraq, both nations destroyed their weapons and ended up being bombed, the West wants regime change in Iran, they will never back away, what threat was Gaddafi or Bashar Al Assad to the west, they both had weak militaries but still got bombed and regimes changed.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.