How you going to filter out the debris of aircraft? You can go round the houses as often as you want - your "command team" clearly stated they were not concerned whether they struck civilian targets or not - yet the Pak army went to great lengths to avoid civilians. Thats the difference. Indians and their press? No one believes. The cats out of the bag. India is the 2025 Baghdad bob.
we never intended to hit any of your high value targets (HVT). First barrage, was only to show we can penetrate just enough, even with, rockets that dont go even that far!Believe it or not but in conflict unintented targets suffer a lot more damage and casualties because they are simply not that well defended as military targets are.
And yes, debris cause much wider damage because they are numerous. This has been seen since world war 2.
If it failed to hit target and exploded, it is not really a problem. Thats what SAM missiles are supposed to do. And 1.5 mil$ is chump change compared to military budget of India.
Heck if this entire enagement costed 10-15 billion dollars (which surely it did not), it is still extremely small amount in terms of budget of India.
Point remains, we have no evidence of HQ-9 hitting that missile, or rather anything. We do have a lot of evidence of things going past HQ-9 and HQ-16 line of defence.
More pertinent point is what is more important. Aircrafts can not operate without ground support. If India is able to hit ALL the ground bases of PAF, that is a major vulnerability for PAF because it puts PAF out of commission.
There is a massive crater in a runway, two hangers were blown up, the PAF personnel killed was a sqadron leader operating Pakistan's AWACS. I will not say this is a minor damage.
To be honest, this is the opinion of Tom Cooper, one of the Europe's leading military analyst and historian...
Illusions and Realities of ‘Cross-Border Incidents’, Part 2 (UPDATED)
(…continued from Part 1…)xxtomcooperxx.substack.com
You called crashing in a wheatfield as hit the target and explode as suckses? Lolol. SAMs are supposed to hit planes not crash into a cornfield. 1.5mil$ is a change where 90% are poorer than subsaharan africans. Good for ya bro. Keep up the good work and crash more 1mil$ misjals. There were numerous crashed Indian missiles and drones, they had multiple HaRops each costing 10mil$.
Good keep fighting the Paks. Your market just decimated 80bil$, one day they will nuke Bangalore and see if India still can recover while China sips tea and look at the idiot picking a fight with a mad bull Pak.
We also have no evidence Pak shot the plane, it just dropped from the sky. Pak intercepted any misjals and drones, some went through, i guess those misjals and drones just mysteriously fell down. Heck the ISpR even showed the radar display of a Brahmos getting'disabled'.
Yes you can try it now and see if the bases still operate, don't keep that 300km buffer. Have you seen the latest flight radar?
Runway craters are actually the easiest to fix. Pak already admitted to 5 crew killed and one minor damaged plane. Other than that I don't see much damage in anynof the so called destroyed Pak bases.There is a massive crater in a runway, two hangers were blown up, the PAF personnel killed was a sqadron leader operating Pakistan's AWACS. I will not say this is a minor damage.
To be honest, this is the opinion of Tom Cooper, one of the Europe's leading military analyst and historian...
Illusions and Realities of ‘Cross-Border Incidents’, Part 2 (UPDATED)
(…continued from Part 1…)
Sir, you should spill some beans now. these peek a boo type of posts increase the appetite even more.
What international audience you're looking for did US show air strikes results in any recent conflicts?did Israel show their results of air strikes on iran̈?
Indians also claims lots of things that's change the fact that we destroyed their military installations or you will deny this also
why do you think? please explain ...
Don't troll here dude
