Did someone mention?
@FuturePAF @Michael
As easy as ABC? How Pakistan unified radars, jets and warning aircraft against India.
In a report on Monday (May 12), China Space News said the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) deployed a “locked by A, launched by B, guided by C” combat system, integrating ground radars with fighter jets, and airborne warning aircraft.
A few countries – such as the United States and Russia – had moved to the “launched by A, guided by B” model, with one aircraft launching the missile, and another able to take over guidance. In the recent skirmish, however, the PAF went one step further to add “guided by C”, the report said.
Michael Dahm, has put it under flawless Kill Chain, military term.
www.airandspaceforces.com
I believe CNN reporter, Nick Roberts, also mentioned that, may be from same source.
I could not find the article in this, if it is the correct original others copied from.
www.spacedaily.com
Next phase would be to integrate, space satellites (Pak has just few satellites so if China allows Beidou), all ground air defense systems, Naval ships, submarine, and MPA (Sea Sultan, P3 Orion) in same network centric C2 system
@FuturePAF @Michael
As easy as ABC? How Pakistan unified radars, jets and warning aircraft against India.
In a report on Monday (May 12), China Space News said the Pakistan Air Force (PAF) deployed a “locked by A, launched by B, guided by C” combat system, integrating ground radars with fighter jets, and airborne warning aircraft.
A few countries – such as the United States and Russia – had moved to the “launched by A, guided by B” model, with one aircraft launching the missile, and another able to take over guidance. In the recent skirmish, however, the PAF went one step further to add “guided by C”, the report said.
Michael Dahm, has put it under flawless Kill Chain, military term.
The Biggest News from India-Pakistan Air Battle: the Kill Chain
Pakistan's kill chain was likely a bigger factor in shooting down an Indian fighter than the jets' relative strengths, an expert said.
I believe CNN reporter, Nick Roberts, also mentioned that, may be from same source.
I could not find the article in this, if it is the correct original others copied from.
The 1965 space pen myth: NASA didn't spend millions to build a pen and the Soviets didn't outsmart anyone with a pencil. Inventor Paul C. Fisher quietly developed the pressurised pen on his own dime and only sold it to NASA.
The story is everywhere: NASA, faced with the challenge of writing in space, spent millions of taxpayer dollars engineering a special pen, while the canny Soviets simply handed their cosmonauts a pencil. It is a satisfying parable about bureaucratic waste versus common sense. Scientific American...
Next phase would be to integrate, space satellites (Pak has just few satellites so if China allows Beidou), all ground air defense systems, Naval ships, submarine, and MPA (Sea Sultan, P3 Orion) in same network centric C2 system
Last edited:






