the vicious kind
Registered Member
Posted this in another thread aswell.
First and foremost, Iran should stop relying on a mix of old Soviet-era systems, reverse-engineered Western hardware, and newer domestic platforms that lacked seamless integration and centralized command and control.
This patchwork setup created blind spots and communication lags, especially under the pressure of a coordinated, multi-domain assault by IAF.
We all so the result. Iran lost the air battle space fairly quickly. I dont believe Mossad had enough personnel to takeout numerous batteries of Sayeed, bavar or khordad. There wasnt a cohesive air space deniel strategy to begin with. No unified airspace management doctrine or real-time data-sharing. It was also so fragmented that individual systems operated in silos, unable to support or back each other up.
The Iranian AD network's downfall wasn’t due to a lack of hardware ,it was the absence of integration, strategy, and most importantly a robust AWACS network.
First and foremost, Iran should stop relying on a mix of old Soviet-era systems, reverse-engineered Western hardware, and newer domestic platforms that lacked seamless integration and centralized command and control.
This patchwork setup created blind spots and communication lags, especially under the pressure of a coordinated, multi-domain assault by IAF.
We all so the result. Iran lost the air battle space fairly quickly. I dont believe Mossad had enough personnel to takeout numerous batteries of Sayeed, bavar or khordad. There wasnt a cohesive air space deniel strategy to begin with. No unified airspace management doctrine or real-time data-sharing. It was also so fragmented that individual systems operated in silos, unable to support or back each other up.
The Iranian AD network's downfall wasn’t due to a lack of hardware ,it was the absence of integration, strategy, and most importantly a robust AWACS network.







