Iran - Israel/US War: Israel-US declare war on Iran, Iran responds

mangekyo said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...


Does Russia allow IAEA inspections of its nuclear facilities? ( i guess not ! ). The best thing Iran can do, it has done is ask the IAEA to leave. It helped manufacture "consent" for the attack on Iran through its recent "findings" which by every measure look to be politicised..

Why is the IAEA collaborating with a non-NPT country about a NPT country? Surely, the IAEA should be getting Israel to become a NPT country first ?
 
Last edited:
muhammed45 said:
Russia was screwed in Ukraine failing to establish aerial buffer zone over Ukrainian territory and these guys are busy with undermining Iranians response.

They don't know what it means when you face American l, Israeli, British and French airforce in one location.

What Iran has done so far from helping Russia to save its back by drone tactics to slapping Israel and USA at same time, is unreachable for all of them.
Click to expand...
Both these guys are a joke!

You know it already no?

They got nothing.
 
SABRE said:
That's what you think. Only the powerful can violate int'law and Iran is not powerful. The US would then have a legitimate reason to bomb Iran and pull off regime change, unless Iran demonstrates it has number of operational nuclear warheads already available. In any case, testing nukes would prove that Israel and the US were right and Iran was making a fool out of everyone. None of the Iran sympathizers would then be able to justify Iran's rights, including self defence. You need to realize Iran is not DPRK, which had tacit security guarantees from China and Russia, and also the fact that DPRK's neighbors - ROK and Japan - are not trigger-happy rogue states like Israel.
Click to expand...
DPRK wouldn't last 2 days if the US goes after it.

It’s got nothing to fight back with.
 
Lulldapull said:
Like Russia does?……..😝
Click to expand...
If Russia didn't have nukes , they would assassinated Putin in first week .... what they did to Russia compare to what they did to us like tickling ( Russia ) to butchering their adversary ( Iran )
 
Last edited:
muhammed45 said:
These are silly rumors bro.

What are we gonna do with 40 J-10 against NATO forces in Iraq and Syria? How much time is needed to produce 40 jets? Its beyond ridiculous.
Click to expand...

So, what is your answer on how to reclaim the control of Iranian airspace by Iran then ?!?
 
Ali_Baba said:
So, what is your answer on how to reclaim the control of Iranian airspace by Iran then ?!?
Click to expand...
we can't do it in 1-2 years and under constant enemy attacks , we have to use mutual destruction option as our last hope ... but it need a leader with courage and some insanity to carry his threat not just throwing empty words
 
Garcia Sea said:
This is the result of rushing into a ceasefire.
Click to expand...
Interesting point this. By all calculations, Iran could have absorbed further Israeli aggression while countering with missiles which would have been costly to Israel. However, it is very possible that Iran simply had depleted its missile stocks and/or lost its launch sites to Israeli raids. Maybe Iran needed to accept the ceasefire to replenish. The question is, has it done so?
 
Garcia Sea said:
Trump, emboldened by Iran’s weak stance, has intensified his threats, declaring that the U.S. will bomb Iran if it determines that Iran still retains uranium enrichment capabilities.
This is no longer a proxy war using Israel as a shield; direct U.S. military invasion is now imminent.
This is the result of rushing into a ceasefire. A country that seeks an early peace and loses the opportunity to fight will inevitably lose its sovereignty and be destroyed.
Can the IRGC still establish a military regime, eliminate the reformists, and prepare for a full scale resistance? To me, it seems hopeless.
The reformists are undoubtedly pressuring Khamenei right now to surrender unconditionally.
Click to expand...

What is preventing the Iranians from using the ceasefire for maximum advantage to prepare for the next phase of the war as Israel is doing?

A pause in fighting benefits both sides.
 
Developereo said:
What is preventing the Iranians from using the ceasefire for maximum advantage to prepare for the next phase of the war as Israel is doing?

A pause in fighting benefits both sides.
Click to expand...
I.R incompetence and old and slow guys at top without having any ally to resupply us immediately.
 
Master Chief said:
Interesting point this. By all calculations, Iran could have absorbed further Israeli aggression while countering with missiles which would have been costly to Israel. However, it is very possible that Iran simply had depleted its missile stocks and/or lost its launch sites to Israeli raids. Maybe Iran needed to accept the ceasefire to replenish. The question is, has it done so?
Click to expand...
Highly unlikely as Iran requires at least 10-12 months to replenish its missiles used in combat or its launchers.

And even the Americans admit that Iran has over 3,000 MRBMs. The real number is probably closer to 5,000-6,000. So, I don't think that was the issue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 72 (members: 3, guests: 69)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top