Pakistan-India Conflict 2025: News Updates and Discussion

arsalan345 said:
we don't want war but in absence of any communication, we are forced to take certain decisions. There is no guarantee of Inian intentons. Last time, Indian jets bombed our civilian infrastructure. 72 jets for 9 targets. Could be 100 jets next time for our nuclear storage fcilities. Thing is there are no guarantees so we can' tak this gamble next time.
Click to expand...
Asim Munir must really prove he has the nerves to climb the escalation ladder against India
 
Vishnu Hypersonic Cruise said:
I agree, If state of Pakistan believes that India is involved in terror attacks on Pakistani soil, then Asim Munir should be asked why he isn’t taking kinetic action against India, the way India responds with kinetic strikes against Pakistan after every terrorist attack.
Click to expand...
26/11/2008? 😅 ?
 
arsalan345 said:
He will. too much restraint shown previously. Next time, it will be much bigger, may be 15 days war.
Click to expand...
I hope so, Because India is by no means escalation-averse—neither the public, the media, nor the political leadership. In fact, there was significant public anger towards Modi after the ceasefire announcement with Pakistan.
 
Vishnu Hypersonic Cruise said:
I hope so, Because India is by no means escalation-averse—neither the public, the media, nor the political leadership. In fact, there was significant public anger towards Modi after the ceasefire announcement with Pakistan.
Click to expand...
no. this is not what i have seen. I have seen majority of Indian public on BJP side. Everyone was asking, pleading for war. We know what we are dealing with. Too much restraint was shown last time for God knows what. May be Americans asked us not to retaliate in the same way etc. Next time, it will not be the same. We can't afford damaged airstrips. we can't afford direct brahmos hits. We have too many missiles. Most of them weren't used. our last short war still haunts me. We aren't a nation who can absord pressure. We had quick retaliation tactic and preemptive strikes was a prefered choice. For some reason, it didn't happen which is a big question.

There are concerns but i hope next time, we will listen to nobody. Enough restraint for one war. Can't show same defensive approach again and again otherwise country will fall apart.
 
Abid123 said:
26/11/2008? 😅 ?
Click to expand...
26/11 Mumbai attacks marked the point when India began developing the Cold Start doctrine. It took years for India to build the capability to strike terrorists inside Pakistan—through military hardware procurement, and also by establishing a robust intelligence network inside Pakistan, with assistance from Iran and Afghanistan. Now, under Narendra Modi, India has taken its policy a step further: it has officially declared that the cost of any terrorist attack on Indian soil will be extracted not just from terrorist groups, but directly from the Pakistan military itself—moving beyond merely targeting terrorist infrastructure.
 
Vishnu Hypersonic Cruise said:
I agree, If state of Pakistan believes that India is involved in terror attacks on Pakistani soil, then Asim Munir should be asked why he isn’t taking kinetic action against India, the way India responds with kinetic strikes against Pakistan after every terrorist attack.
Click to expand...
Yes I agree, Pakistan should attack hindu temples and the RSS/hindutva fascist terrorists in india the next time there's a terrorist attack in Pakistan. But this tit for tat is unsustainable. I think a "final solution" needs to be implemented, the conflict between Islamic and hindu ideology in the subcontinent has gone on long enough, and there's no space for both entities to exist at the same time. The nuclear weapons should be used by both sides.
 
Corax said:
Yes I agree, Pakistan should attack hindu temples and the RSS/hindutva fascist terrorists in india the next time there's a terrorist attack in Pakistan. But this tit for tat is unsustainable. I think a "final solution" needs to be implemented, the conflict between Islamic and hindu ideology in the subcontinent has gone on long enough, and there's no space for both entities to exist at the same time. The nuclear weapons should be used by both sides.
Click to expand...


Can we have your address in UK so that you are the first one to depart in such a scenario? Or perhaps Brits should do the same in Britain?
 
IAF need to realize with every passing surgikal strikes their surprise element is vanishing. This time PAF was fully expecting IAF attack.

On the other hand only thing IAF learned from 2019 was not to cross border and they will be safe. Too bad, now keep blaming Modi.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


India blunders of Surgikal strikes and its affects.
 
r3alist said:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
Click to expand...

Never in my life did I imagine Bilawal Bhutto, of all people, would actually get it. Am shocked.

He truly gets it. He understands what the Indus Valley Civilisation is and what the River Indus means to Pakistan.
 
Master Chief said:
Never in my life did I imagine Bilawal Bhutto, of all people, would actually get it. Am shocked.

He truly gets it. He understands what the Indus Valley Civilisation is and what the River Indus means to Pakistan.
Click to expand...
I believe his grand dad even made similar comments in old videos....one thing you can count on will be his loyalty to his family legacy and heritage
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • TF8
Total: 40 (members: 1, guests: 39)

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Share this page

Back
Top