Pak-Warrior
Registered Member
Advantages over P-3C:
Some details aren't 100% verified, but the AShW payload capacity of the Sea Sultan will be comparable to the P-3C, but ASW capacity may be less than P-3C due to a smaller torpedo bay (if there is one, which also hasn't been 100% confirmed yet).
- PN can buy more units whenever it wants
- Cheaper to maintain as it's a widely used airliner
- Cheaper to fly as it's a widely used airliener
- Easier to upgrade as its COTS at every level
- Will likely carry Taimur and/or Rasoob ALCMs.
- Will likely carry AWC LWT
OTOH, the point of the Sea Sultan is to bank more on lower upfront and lifecycle costs, which helps you buy more units. Moreover, it it would be configured for future ops scenarios, like MUM-T ops with ASW-equipped Shahpar-III or, potentially, P282 compatibility (hypersonic ALBM).
Compared to the P-8, the Sea Sultan will obviously have less range, less endurance, and less payload. However, the Sea Sultan will likely have a much lower upfront and lifecycle cost.
For ex., the Saab Swordfish (comparable concept to the Sea Sultan) was to cost 2/3 the Poseidon upfront, and 1/3 over its life. I'd wager the Sea Sultan is comparable to that, or even less.
So, PN is looking for bigger fleet of sea sultans. The platform will have ASW & AShm capability. The onboard sensors can help it detect enemy warships. how about aerial threats to itself? Is there any detection capabilities against aerial threats ? So it can remains away from those. Do PN intends to induct AEW&C aircraft as well ?







