US Political News and Trump’s China visit

While it maybe too early to say, Zohran Mamdani, could have changed US politics tonight. This could be South Asian, and especially Muslim American’s “Obama Moment”; finally to be seen as just like other Americans by the National consciousness.

The trend is unmistakable to notice and irreversible to control: The 'progressive' vote block whether expressed in the Labor Party of the UK or the Democratic Party of America are going to be more 'inclusive'. Sure, the official policies are going to be considerably different from their respective vote banks, especially when it comes to the geopolitics as there are deeply entrenched interest groups who won't give up their anachronistic mindset and $$. But the trend is irreversible as far as the expression of a certain school of thought in those two political parties are concerned.
@hussain0216
 
That's the reason why people are being pull to further left, and that's also the reason why Harris campaign falls apart in 2024.

None of the major party is actively trying to solve the issue of cost of living crisis, Trump is pinning it on illegal (which works nothing) and Harris is pinning it on Trump inability to do stuff. Not a single party is there to help the young people, and that's the issue.

GOP is now shooting itself on the foot, but the Dem is not taking advantage on this, if they keep working on Orange Man bad, they aren't going to pull people back to their side, they need someone to start selling something people believe, instead of still championing social justice, if they had done that, people will flock to them and voting for a better future, instead of just saying Trump is bad, well, I know Trump was bad, I don't need a 24/7 constant reminder from the Dem telling me so, I want someone to tell me how you are going to solve the cost of living crisis........

With the 3-4 trillion tax break for the rich, but barely a trillion for infrastructure in that bipartisan infrastructure law from a few years ago, we know priorities are out of whack.

It’s simple that we need more housing and we need a way for people to get to and from work faster so they can live further out.

I was watching a Peter Santenello video where he interviewed people on the Northern California coast. At 36:20-37:00 the lumber yard owners states the forests have too many trees. Considering all the forest fires out west, it might be right. That tells me US forests may have too many trees and we could use that to build out millions of single family homes in areas around major job markets.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


There is also a need for better highways and rail lines into and out of major job sites to make it more economical for people to live further out.

If we can give a $3-4 trillion break to the rich, we can invest in building starter homes to lower the cost of living. It wouldn’t undercut the housing markets closer in to cities and help the tax base in further out suburbs, as well as create an environment where young people could afford to start a family, helping with the fertility rate and lower the need to bring in as many unskilled immigrants. A virtuous cycle if done correctly.

There are perfectly good ghost towns that could be “repopulated” with young families and many if not most would be glad to get out of the big cities, if there was a quick way to get to work, such as high speed rail. Our population was 200 million at the start of the 70s, when these towns started their decline. We are now closing in on 350 million, nearly double what it was then. Having lived for years in a small town not much different from the one in the following video, during college, I hope these small towns can come back, if only to give Americans now or our descendants more options to live their dreams.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Last edited:
The trend is unmistakable to notice and irreversible to control: The 'progressive' vote block whether expressed in the Labor Party of the UK or the Democratic Party of America are going to be more 'inclusive'. Sure, the official policies are going to be considerably different from their respective vote banks, especially when it comes to the geopolitics as there are deeply entrenched interest groups who won't give up their anachronistic mindset and $$. But the trend is irreversible as far as the expression of a certain school of thought in those two political parties are concerned.
@hussain0216
It can’t be taken for granted, especially as other non-white groups also feel a precarious footing in the body politic, with Trump’s rhetoric riling up many Americans. African Americans, Latinos, and Asians, especially as their percentages of the population increase vis a vi White Americans, may not have the same desire to defer to inclusivity over more in group tough negotiating. Zohran’s visit to the NAN (National Action Network) to get Rev. Sharpton’s endorsement is one faction of one group’s terms.

Ultimately, it will be about a real plan to try to lower the cost of living, in the short, medium, and long terms. One plan maybe to rezone more of the city to allow the building of housing to support a further 1-1.5 million more residents within the city of New York, perhaps as part of a larger effort, similar to mayor Bloomberg’s 2005 rezoning to get the Olympics in New York. So perhaps New York 2040 Olympics, with a side of a lot more housing?

There are parts of the upper east side where someone is paying $2700 for a 250 sq. foot studio. The new potential housing may put downward pressure on rents for even that person.

The republicans for their party claim trickle down economics will work, but even they don’t loon to sell it anymore to the public before the pass it in congress.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
The National Intelligence Agency officially refers to former President Barack Obama to the Ministry of Justice to start a criminal investigation, in his role in fabricating intelligence information to link Trump in Russia after the 2016 elections, with the intention of sabotaging and undermining the Trump presidency.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

Nothing will happen to Obama; he has presidential immunity, the same immunity the Supreme Court granted Trump.
 
With the 3-4 trillion tax break for the rich, but barely a trillion for infrastructure in that bipartisan infrastructure law from a few years ago, we know priorities are out of whack.

It’s simple that we need more housing and we need a way for people to get to and from work faster so they can live further out.

I was watching a Peter Santenello video where he interviewed people on the Northern California coast. At 36:20-37:00 the lumber yard owners states the forests have too many trees. Considering all the forest fires out west, it might be right. That tells me US forests may have too many trees and we could use that to build out millions of single family homes in areas around major job markets.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


There is also a need for better highways and rail lines into and out of major job sites to make it more economical for people to live further out.

If we can give a $3-4 trillion break to the rich, we can invest in building starter homes to lower the cost of living. It wouldn’t undercut the housing markets closer in to cities and help the tax base in further out suburbs, as well as create an environment where young people could afford to start a family, helping with the fertility rate and lower the need to bring in as many unskilled immigrants. A virtuous cycle if done correctly.

There are perfectly good ghost towns that could be “repopulated” with young families and many if not most would be glad to get out of the big cities, if there was a quick way to get to work, such as high speed rail. Our population was 200 million at the start of the 70s, when these towns started their decline. We are now closing in on 350 million, nearly double what it was then. Having lived for years in a small town not much different from the one in the following video, during college, I hope these small towns can come back, if only to give Americans now or our descendants more options to live their dreams.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

That's how America works, Bipartisanship, unlike UK, Canada or Australia system, where you win the general election, you call the shot, there are no congress, no senate (The party have to own both upper and lower houses to win an election) so bills and laws can press through regardless of who incharge, and US don't work like that, you have 3 separate entity, and you need either the other party to agree or you own all 3 entities to get bill pass, and even so, you still need supermajority.

On the other hand, since Obama, we aren't bi-partisan, we are partisan to the extreme, country had been divided left and right and either party aren't going to let the other party to get ahead. Even Biden passing that build back better bill is extremely lucky, because the Dem controlled both house back in 2021. Whichis now gutted by Trump's Big Beautiful Bill half way thru, and when Dem pick back up in 2028, they are going to gut Trump's Big Beautiful Bill like Trump did with Biden's bill, you just watch......

Everyday American felt like they are being shafted, and that's wounding in one direction after the other, and after seeing Trump extreme right, the American people are going to wound them back to extreme left afterward, that's how Progressive like Mamdani won the Dem primary.

As I said previously, we need a center-left government tilted toward conservative spending after Trump if you want any future in this country, but somehow I just don't see it, it will not surprise me at all if AOC or Bernie are picking up as POTUS come 2028, if they know how to play their cards. GOP is done after this, now whether or not those people who aren't going to vote for GOP vote for Dem is another issue, but as long as Dem being smart, they WILL OWN the 2026 and 2028 election, and if you think it's tough now, wait another 3 to 4 months when the surge we had made between March and May are depleted and we are really feeling the effect of high price. Unless Trump really can score multiple deal in his favor before September, high price is coming after Summer.......
 
That's how America works, Bipartisanship, unlike UK, Canada or Australia system, where you win the general election, you call the shot, there are no congress, no senate (The party have to own both upper and lower houses to win an election) so bills and laws can press through regardless of who incharge, and US don't work like that, you have 3 separate entity, and you need either the other party to agree or you own all 3 entities to get bill pass, and even so, you still need supermajority. On the other hand, since Obama, we aren't bi-partisan, we are partisan to the extreme, country had been divided left and right and either party aren't going to let the other party to get ahead. Even Biden passing that build back better bill is extremely lucky, because the Dem controlled both house back in 2021. Whichis now gutted by Trump's Big Beautiful Bill half way thru, and when Dem pick back up in 2028, they are going to gut Trump's Big Beautiful Bill like Trump did with Biden's bill, you just watch...... Everyday American felt like they are being shafted, and that's wounding in one direction after the other, and after seeing Trump extreme right, the American people are going to wound them back to extreme left afterward, that's how Progressive like Mamdani won the Dem primary. As I said previously, we need a center-left government tilted toward conservative spending after Trump if you want any future in this country, but somehow I just don't see it, it will not surprise me at all if AOC or Bernie are picking up as POTUS come 2028, if they know how to play their cards. GOP is done after this, now whether or not those people who aren't going to vote for GOP vote for Dem is another issue, but as long as Dem being smart, they WILL OWN the 2026 and 2028 election, and if you think it's tough now, wait another 3 to 4 months when the surge we had made between March and May are depleted and we are really feeling the effect of high price. Unless Trump really can score multiple deal in his favor before September, high price is coming after Summer.......

That’s why I’m waiting for the dems to have an other Cajun moment and say again, “it’s the economy stupid”. I’m looking to see when not if Andy Beshear makes a run for the presidency. A southern Democrat; 3/5 last dem presidents have been southerners. A center left fiscally conservative could really appeal to independents and even republicans. A competent politician, not a flashy showman.

This is him last week on the topic.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


He looks straight out of central casting. Reminds me of the 90s movie about a Presidential body double.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Hopefully he stands on the issues in alignment with the base.
 
Last edited:
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
We might have an early gauge of how pissed the base really are, with the following election coming up. Establishment dems don’t look to be effectively combating Trump, so this southwest district maybe a harbinger of things to come in the democrat party.

Even if she doesn’t win, if the anti-Trump need is not satisfied by the establishment dem, she could run again in 2026 with even more wind in her sail. It the gap in the vote that will be interesting to watch, if she doesn’t win. If she wins it will be a blow to the gerentocracy that has hobbled the Democrat party, who still think the base are middle class people. Due to the economic hollowing out of the middle class, the base is the working class.

Her opponent has already been given the AIPAC Israel trip, in 2011; the long game. 20:40-28:40

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


This is the 7th Arizona congressional district. Covers nearly the entire border in Arizona.

Primary Election July 15th; effectively the election for this election, this coming Tuesday.


Btw, the democrats tried and tired consultant class recommended narrative will be put up to the challenge by this election.

John Stewart, who was a major voice in the GW bush and Obama era, is giving this advice to the Dems. So they ought to listen if they want to win again.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Substantial platforms, not just slogans , will attract voters.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

As expected, the results came in with mainstream Democrat Adelita Grijalva securing 62 percent of the vote. Meanwhile, progressive activist Deja Foxx took a heavy defeat, managing only 20 percent. On a more serious note, the endorsements created plenty of confusion. While Foxx was backed by progressive figure David Hogg, Grijalva received support from Bernie Sanders and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, names typically aligned with progressive causes. That dynamic left many voters scratching their heads about where the ideological fault lines really stood in this race.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

This is political theater, plain and simple, yet another flimsy attempt by the Trump administration to divert attention from the unresolved Epstein scandal. Tulsi Gabbard, whose credibility is virtually nonexistent, is playing a familiar role. Let’s not forget she launched her career posing as a progressive Democrat, and now she seems to be cosplaying as MAGA.

It’s unclear whether Gabbard was instructed to dredge up a previously debunked Republican report from 2020, one that was thoroughly discredited by a Republican-led, bipartisan Senate investigation affirming that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to aid Trump, or whether she did it independently to appease her boss. Either way, it reeks of desperation.

Remember, this is the same Gabbard who in March, while serving as Director of National Intelligence, testified before Congress that Iran was not actively building a nuclear weapon and that Supreme Leader of Iran had not authorized such a program. She emphasized that the intelligence community had found no evidence of Iran finalizing a warhead. Trump, when asked about her assessment, dismissed it with “I don’t care what she said. I think they were very close to having one.”

He brushed her off entirely, and soon after, ordered strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. So, if Trump didn’t respect her judgment then, why should anyone take her seriously now?
 
That’s why I’m waiting for the dems to have an other Cajun moment and say again, “it’s the economy stupid”. I’m looking to see when not if Andy Beshear makes a run for the presidency. A southern Democrat; 3/5 last dem presidents have been southerners. A center left fiscally conservative could really appeal to independents and even republicans. A competent politician, not a flashy showman.

This is him last week on the topic.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


He looks straight out of central casting. Reminds me of the 90s movie about a Presidential body double.
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.


Hopefully he stands on the issues in alignment with the base.

I like Governor Andy Beshear for his pragmatic leadership as a moderate Democrat in a red state. His governing style resonates with moderate Republicans and independents, thanks to his focus on practical issues and bipartisan tone. At the same time, his progressive stances on social issues, such as abortion rights, LGBTQ, and education policy, give him strong appeal among liberals. That ideological balance is a real asset.

However, if there’s one area where Beshear could improve, it’s his public persona. A touch more humor could elevate his connection with voters. Historically, presidents like Reagan, Clinton, Obama, and even Trump—despite his darker brand of sarcasm, understood that humor humanizes leadership. Americans appreciate wit and warmth in their leaders, and Beshear could benefit from adding that dimension to his style.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

The poll revealed a telling contradiction: 63% of respondents rated the Democratic Party, Unfavorable. Yet, in that same poll, Democrats held a 3-point lead over Republicans in the 2026 Generic Congressional Vote. Interestingly, about 20% of those unfavorable ratings came from Democrats themselves.

This discontent appears to be less about ideological defection and more about internal party tensions. The Democratic Party is undergoing a visible power struggle between its mainstream moderates and a progressive wing that’s challenging the traditional establishment. This friction fuels criticism, but it hasn’t translated into electoral collapse.

In fact, Democrats are steadily gaining ground. In recent months, they’ve won a series of races with strong margins. In New York, they outperformed expectations in multiple districts. In Florida, although they lost two contests, the margins were notably reduced, indicating growing competitiveness in historically Republican areas. Looking ahead, polling in critical battleground states like North Carolina and Virginia shows Democrats with substantial leads over their Republican counterparts.

This momentum is reflected in national polling averages as well. RealClearPolitics shows Democrats ahead by 2.9% in the 2026 Generic Congressional Vote. Combined with their performance in the Wall Street Journal poll, it's clear that voter behavior is diverging from surface-level sentiment.

Many voters, including disillusioned Democrats and independents, seem to be making a strategic decision. Even if they criticize the Democratic Party, they still view its candidates as preferable when it comes time to vote. Dissatisfaction hasn’t led to mass defection, it’s resulting in tactical support.
 
Here is my take on the issue. It’s based on my personal knowledge and research.

The Trump administration has been very vocal about its stance on undocumented immigration, primarily emphasizing border control, deportation measures, and enhanced physical infrastructure. While these efforts have undoubtedly increased deterrence and made unlawful entry more difficult, they address only one part of the problem. The deeper economic incentives that attract undocumented immigrants remain largely unchallenged.

A truly effective strategy should include four key areas: first, strict enforcement against employers who knowingly hire undocumented workers; second, legal consequences for landlords who rent to individuals without legal status; third, reinforced border security; and fourth, a robust visa enforcement system to track expiration and deter overstays.

On the border front, the administration has made solid progress. Physical barriers, increased patrol staffing, and advanced surveillance technologies have elevated the difficulty of illegal crossings and sent a clear message to potential violators. These investments help preserve the integrity of lawful immigration pathways.

However, the heart of the issue is demand for cheap, undocumented labor. Employers who knowingly hire unauthorized workers create a powerful incentive for individuals to enter or stay illegally. Without this demand, the incentive structure collapses. Unfortunately, current laws lack serious bite. Fines for first-time violations can be as low as $700 per worker, and even repeat violations seldom result in meaningful criminal penalties. Prosecuting employers is rare, and that’s a major blind spot in enforcement.

Visa overstays also account for a significant share of undocumented immigrants, nearly 40 percent. Any serious reform must include better tracking, mandatory verification systems like E-Verify, and stronger consequences for those who remain beyond their authorized period.

Now, behind the scenes, the Trump administration has also made quiet but important reforms to legal immigration channels, specifically the H-2A (agricultural) and H-2B (seasonal non-agricultural) visa programs. These reforms have gone largely unnoticed but are vital to shifting the labor market away from reliance on undocumented workers.

The Department of Labor is streamlining the H-2A approval process to support small and mid-sized farms, suspending regulatory requirements that were considered burdensome, and introducing new real-time tracking tools for employers. ICE has reduced worksite enforcement in agricultural regions to ease pressure on labor supplies. In parallel, proposals are under review to expand H-2B availability for industries like hospitality, cleaning, construction, and entertainment, and to lift cap restrictions during peak seasons.

These changes reflect a more practical and economically grounded approach. Let’s be honest, many Americans are unwilling to take on low-paying, physically demanding jobs in industries like farming, cleaning, and construction. Expanding legal work visas allows employers to fill these essential roles without resorting to illegal hiring practices.

The public face of enforcement may focus on walls and deportations, but the smarter, long-term strategy lies in making illegal employment harder while strengthening legal routes for foreign labor. Reforming visa programs and cracking down on the businesses that drive illegal hiring are both necessary steps toward a more balanced and sustainable immigration system.

@j_hungary @Hamartia Antidote @FuturePAF @Davey Crockett
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Posts

Back
Top