ShapurII
Trusted Member
I disagree with this entirely.From Israeli POV,
- Could not destroy nuclear program on which their entire war narrative was built. Thats a Strategic level failure if the primary goal of the war is not achieved.
- Could not kill the actual IRI leadership so the very system that they say is the ultimate evil they face is still sitting in Tehran with all its tools in hands.
- Could not deter IRGC from striking back in heart of Israel despite killing CoC. Thats again a strategic failure. If the operation was to teach IRGC a lesson then tit failed miserably because the same IRGC kept firing back till the last minute. An undeterred enemy still alive means the operational goal is failed.
- Failed to have any answer to saving their own cities, port, institutions. US kept on supplying them during the war otherwise the SAM numbers dwindled. The interceptions became costly. AIPAC and Epstein files would not always work.
- Could not turn the Iranian public against IRI. Instead by bombing civilians they they rallied the nation around Mullahs the very same way Saddam did.
So what did Israel achieve? Killing civilians, few replaceable few retired legacy generals whose departure probably helped Iran more?
Israeli goals were some random killing civilians on street? Yes IRI is a failure system of incompetent fools. Sanctioned, Isolated. corrupt as hell. What is the Israeli excuse here despite sitting in lap of every global power simulatenously.
Our nuclear infrastructure has been severely damaged. Sure, the Israelis had to ask the Americans to do that for them, but nevertheless, it was achieved.
Even if Iran somehow manages to enrich uranium up to 90%, and we end up with enough highly-enriched uranium for 10 bombs, it's still stored in UF6 gaseous state. We need to convert it to uranium metal, and the facility for that has been bombed already. So, even if we generously assume that Iran is still in possession of the HEU and a reliable enrichment method like our centrifuges or LIS at some undisclosed location, unless we have some covert uranium conversion facility, they have already achieved their goal of destroying Iran's latent nuclear capability.
Secondly, they murdered 12 nuclear scientists in Iran. They killed +30 IRGC and Artesh generals. It's very demoralizing. Imagine you're a nuclear scientist and you see that the regime you are working for cannot even defend its highest ranks from Israel. This will dishearten and discourage our forces inside Iran. And in return for that, how many high-ranking Israelis were killed? Zero!
Thirdly, people here assume that Israel has somehow stopped trying to topple the regime and disintegrate Iran. Their plan is on and they're still moving towards that even more than before. As I said, if you see this battle as one lone incident, then yes, you could say Israel failed to achieve their goals, but when you look at it as one battle in a war in greater scheme of things, and future regional plans, then Israel did achieve some success there as well. The fact that we had Baluch and Kurdish separatist attacks afterwards is an indication of what Israel has in mind. Also, the US is still working on some covert takeover of Iran and turn Iran into a tamed state, exactly like what people like Pezeshkian and Araghchi are doing now.
Israel failed to overthrow the regime because of their miscalculations about the Iranian people, not the Iranian regime. They were spot on about the regime's response to their pre-emptive attack. But Iranians did surprise them. They never thought that the Iranians would get so united against them after this. Again, their calculations about the regime and our armed forces were spot on, only Iranians ruined their plans.



