2025 China Victory Day Parade
- Thread starter Michael
- Start date
Indos
INT'L MOD
If Modi is invited, at least their foreign minister will show up if Modi choose not to attend
Hendarto
Registered Member
Now this missile everything else obsolete
Trans
The anti-ship missile formation is composed of the Yingji-15 missile, Yingji-19, Yingji-17, and Yingji-20 hypersonic missiles. These four types of anti-ship missiles can be deployed on various platforms, including carrier-based aircraft, surface ships, and submarines, and are characterized by long range, high speed, and strong destructive power, making them "vanguard weapons" for attacking enemy targets at sea.The anti-ship missile formation was organized around a certain unit of the PLA Navy.
Trans
The anti-ship missile formation is composed of the Yingji-15 missile, Yingji-19, Yingji-17, and Yingji-20 hypersonic missiles. These four types of anti-ship missiles can be deployed on various platforms, including carrier-based aircraft, surface ships, and submarines, and are characterized by long range, high speed, and strong destructive power, making them "vanguard weapons" for attacking enemy targets at sea.The anti-ship missile formation was organized around a certain unit of the PLA Navy.
神威98
Registered Member
GlobalTimes is of the same opinion as me -- don't like the J-50/Type B tail-less stealth drone very much (that's y they only focus on the Type A variants in their pics):
IMO, J-36/Type A stealth drone is the work horse of the PLAAF. J-50 with all-moving wing tips looks so unstable in flight. I doubt you want to deal with the extra complexities like stabilize the cameras/sensors on the bird, especially on something like a stealth drone.
IMO, J-36/Type A stealth drone is the work horse of the PLAAF. J-50 with all-moving wing tips looks so unstable in flight. I doubt you want to deal with the extra complexities like stabilize the cameras/sensors on the bird, especially on something like a stealth drone.
FuturePAF
THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Hell march edit is out:
Btw, very curious to know the dimensions of the HHQ-9C. Looks like it might be able to fit the VLS on the Type 054A/P. If they match the diameter of the HQ-16FE, but are much lighter and use more modern propellant, range could be significantly improved alongside speed and capability to hit highly maneuverable targets like the Brahmos or its hypersonic follow on.
HHQ-9C seems to be china’s answer to the PAC 3 MSE. Probably my even has the lethality enhancer (a blast fragmentation warhead when the missiles close to the target to ensure it get a kill if the hit to kill is off).
This was the mid range missile I was saying Pakistan needs in numbers, along side the HQ-19/29, to counter the Indian upper end and medium end missile threat. We only have to look at how the PAC 3 MSE has been performing the last 3 years in conflicts around the world.
Btw, very curious to know the dimensions of the HHQ-9C. Looks like it might be able to fit the VLS on the Type 054A/P. If they match the diameter of the HQ-16FE, but are much lighter and use more modern propellant, range could be significantly improved alongside speed and capability to hit highly maneuverable targets like the Brahmos or its hypersonic follow on.
HHQ-9C seems to be china’s answer to the PAC 3 MSE. Probably my even has the lethality enhancer (a blast fragmentation warhead when the missiles close to the target to ensure it get a kill if the hit to kill is off).
This was the mid range missile I was saying Pakistan needs in numbers, along side the HQ-19/29, to counter the Indian upper end and medium end missile threat. We only have to look at how the PAC 3 MSE has been performing the last 3 years in conflicts around the world.
Last edited:
KingQamaR
Elite Member
US industrial complex need not worry, you guys told us China can only copy and not innovate so just sit down and watch the show…
KingQamaR
Elite Member
iblini
Trusted Member
The scariest part is the speed of the country's development, looking back to 2015 parade, it felt like multiple decades ago, and we can only imagine what PLA would looks like in five, ten years, with the helps of biggest manufacture power house from civilian sector.
KingQamaR
Elite Member
Looking at this compared to the 75Th anniversary in 2019. Got to say they’ve evolved their capabilities RAPIDLY. The modernisation is insane to say the least. Their tech is on par on the same tier as the US’s or maybe even ahead
FHN
Trusted Member
A few more pics of the recently unveiled Chinese CCAs
So, we have :
- "High tier" Delta wings, DSI with EOTS and DAS
- "High tier" Lambda wings, caret intakes
- "Low- tier" stealth CCA
- "Low-tier " non-stealth CCA.
Last edited:
FHN
Trusted Member
The 2 large ones are Unmanned Air Dominance Fighters (UADF).
The smaller ones were called Unmanned Wingmen. Those are theCCA equivalents. No one, including the US, has shown even a mockup of a fully fledged 6th gen UADF (or UCAV). The UADF The high-tier stuff is very intriguing. Its size is around ~15m and is in the medium-weight category fighter comparable to the J-10. The newest WS-10 variant is used and with the official unveiling of the J-20S (twin seater), China already has the unmanned teaming setup down and is probably coming up with tactics and proficiency training right now. Awesome!
The smaller ones were called Unmanned Wingmen. Those are theCCA equivalents. No one, including the US, has shown even a mockup of a fully fledged 6th gen UADF (or UCAV). The UADF The high-tier stuff is very intriguing. Its size is around ~15m and is in the medium-weight category fighter comparable to the J-10. The newest WS-10 variant is used and with the official unveiling of the J-20S (twin seater), China already has the unmanned teaming setup down and is probably coming up with tactics and proficiency training right now. Awesome!
iblini
Trusted Member
Users who are viewing this thread
Pakistan Defence Latest
Country Watch Latest
-
-
-
-
US Navy unveils new long range air-air missile in testing the AIM-424 Malice (15 Viewers)
- Latest: huanghong
-
