Sea Port / Dry Port and Maritime Updates.

Why would it end BLA? If anything it will further anger them
The Chinese are hesitant to take action against BLA's foreign sponsors Iran/India/Afg, especially kinetic action. The US is not.

Moreover, on the international stage the US still holds far more influence than China.

The Americans can plug the gaps where the Chinese aren't yet able to help us.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Pakistan courts US with pitch for new Arabian Sea port Audacious plan would give Washington a mineral gateway near China’s flank Pakistan’s army chief Asim Munir and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif present US President Donald Trump with mineral samples at the White House

1759627612858.png

Pakistan approached US officials with an offer to build and run a port on the Arabian Sea that could give Washington a foothold in one of the world’s most sensitive regions. The audacious plan, seen by the Financial Times, envisages American investors developing the seaside fishing town of Pasni as a terminal for access to Pakistan’s critical minerals. Pasni is just 100 miles from Iran and 70 miles from the Pakistani city of Gwadar, which has a China-backed port. The initiative, which is not official policy, reflects how Pakistani officials are exploring ways to capitalise on the sweeping geopolitical upheaval in South Asia of recent months.

The offer has been floated with some US officials, and was shared with Munir ahead of a meeting with Donald Trump in the White House late last month, according to two civilian advisers to the army chief who both asked not to be named. But a senior Trump administration official said the US president and his advisers had not discussed such a proposal. The scheme is one of several ideas floated publicly and privately by Pakistani officials to maintain momentum with the Trump administration. They include engagement with a Trump-backed crypto venture, deepening co-operation against Afghanistan-based militant group Isis-K, endorsement of his Gaza peace plan and access to critical minerals. Munir and Trump have forged what US and Pakistani diplomats are referring to as “a bromance” since the American president claimed credit in May for a ceasefire that ended the worst fighting between Pakistan and India in decades. After two decades of warming ties with India, the US has over the summer publicly sparred with New Delhi. While India has rejected Trump’s claims of involvement in the ceasefire, Munir and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif have publicly thanked him and nominated him for the Nobel Peace Prize. In return, Trump has lavished praise on Pakistan’s army chief. After their latest meeting last month, the White House released pictures of Munir and Sharif presenting the US leader with a display case of mineral samples. “The whole narrative [of the US-Pakistan] relationship changed after the war,” said one of the advisers, who has been involved in back-channel contacts with the Trump circle for more than a year. “It was very bad before then.


We had not tended the relationship as we should have,” the adviser said. “In the last two decades the Indians occupied the space in the vacuum.” The proposed port at Pasni would be linked to a new railway to transport minerals from Pakistan’s interior, the advisers said, in particular copper and antimony, a vital ingredient in batteries, fire-retardant and missiles. A blueprint anticipated the port would cost up to $1.2bn with a proposed financing model that would be a mix of Pakistani federal and US-backed development finance.

Advocates of the plan see it as a way of hedging the country’s position on the global stage as it seeks to balance a constellation of diplomatic ties with China, the US, Iran and Saudi Arabia, with which Islamabad signed a security pact last month. “Pasni’s proximity to Iran and Central Asia enhances US options for trade and security . . . Engagement at Pasni would counterbalance Gwadar . . . and expand US influence in the Arabian Sea and Central Asia,” according to the blueprint. “China’s Gwadar investments under the Belt and Road Initiative raise dual-use concerns,” it added, in an apparent allusion to US concerns Gwadar could serve as a Chinese naval base, a suggestion denied by Islamabad and Beijing.

On Saturday a senior Pakistani military official said the chief of Army staff “does not have any advisers in an official capacity”. The official added that the port idea “surfaced in private discussions” with US businesses and had not been “submitted through official channels” and “remains a commercial idea pending appropriate consideration”. Washington is concerned that China’s development of the port at Gwadar could be used as a naval base for Beijing © Asim Hafeez/Bloomberg China is traditionally Pakistan’s closest partner, providing much of its armoury and billions of dollars of loans and investments. Pakistan used China-supplied aircraft and weapons systems to shoot down up to six Indian aircraft in May. The blueprint said the Pasni plan excluded “direct basing”, which the advisers said meant the port would not serve as a US military installation. America was a close ally during the cold war and after the September 11 2001 terrorist attacks on the US, but ties frayed over Pakistan’s support for the Taliban during the Washington-led war in Afghanistan. Now it is keen to refashion links focusing on investments and trade. “I’ve been telling our leaders we need to diversify from China,” one of the Pakistani advisers said, while maintaining the decades-old bond with Beijing. “We don’t need to consult the Chinese as it’s outside the Gwadar concession.” In an early indication of US interest in Pakistan’s mineral sector, Missouri-based company US Strategic Metals in September signed a memorandum of understanding with Pakistan’s military engineering arm to boost collaboration. Mike Hollomon, USSM commercial director, said the company aspired to set up a refinery and last month met directors of Pakistan’s two major ports at and near Karachi, as well as a representative from Gwadar during a visit to the South Asian country. Hollomon added that USSM had heard talk of a possible port project near Pasni. The town had a natural deep-water port and could be linked by rail to Reko Diq, a copper and gold mine being developed by Canada’s Barrick Mining, so it made “a lot of sense” to set up a facility in the area, he said. Recommended Pakistan How Pakistan wooed Trump — and rattled India “In our conversations with the field marshal, he stressed that Pakistan has been an ally of the US for a long time and minerals is a way to rekindle a dormant friendship,” Hollomon said. Late last month, Pakistan shipped a modest first consignment of fewer than two tonnes of critical and rare earth minerals to USSM that included copper, antimony and neodymium. The price of antimony has soared since Beijing imposed a ban on selling it to the US late last year. Pakistan’s minerals sector currently contributes only about 3 per cent of its GDP, and much of its undeveloped resources are in western provinces plagued by brutal insurgencies that caused more than 2,000 deaths last year. But Hussain Abidi, chair of the state-run Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, said the country had vast untapped mineral potential. “This is a reset with America through economic ties rather than just the traditional security ties.” Additional reporting by Abigail Hauslohner in Washington
 
Now just look how the establishment teaspoons are spinning it …

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Its risky move... depends if it will be purely commerical or will it involved their military
 
Nope..

It is dumb idea…
These people !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11 , Ayub Khan provided Badaber base near Peshawar and the outcome.1759630106842.png
US never showed up during fall of Decca. These General should start romance with Pakistan instead of Western nations.

And now PAF base Pasani ...
1759630268347.png

1759629740508.png


 
Last edited:
I heard that military junta refused to take back Pakistani senator from Israel and Their account handlers are saying he should die there. And they busy selling their lands to hostile countries
 
Last edited:
It seems stupid idea beside non fully operational Gwadar port and for media amusement purposes.
 
JUST SPECULATION FOR NOW.

Advisers to Pakistan’s military strongman Asim Munir have approached US officials with an offer to build and run a port on the Arabian Sea that could give Washington a foothold in one of the world’s most sensitive regions.

The audacious plan, seen by the Financial Times, envisages American investors developing the seaside fishing town of Pasni as a terminal for access to Pakistan’s critical minerals. Pasni is just 100 miles from Iran and 70 miles from the Pakistani city of Gwadar, which has a China-backed port.

The initiative, which is not official policy, reflects how Pakistani officials are exploring ways to capitalise on the sweeping geopolitical upheaval in South Asia of recent months.

The offer has been floated with some US officials, and was shared with Munir ahead of a meeting with Donald Trump in the White House late last month, according to two civilian advisers to the army chief who both asked not to be named. But a senior Trump administration official said the US president and his advisers had not discussed such a proposal.

View attachment 151476

Why does Pakistan want a second port, if we have Gwadar already?
Not again. 5th duplicate thread
 
Summary of the article:
1- Pakistan just keeps finding ways to be as compliant to the US as possible. Why do you need a whole different port to export rocks and dirt?
2- This whole relationship is based on a personal one between Trump and FM, catering to his narcissistic tendencies.

It's boils down to "Pakistan Democracy act" where muneera is mentioned by name. This what happen when highly controversial figures manage to find positions of power in state through backdoor.

Their personal liabilities becomes nation's liability. Sorry tale of Pakistan.
 
Is there enough time to build these? I dont think there's enough time left.
Within a year or 2, shit will escalate a lot more and this would be irrelevant perhaps

Generals don't think long term, it's only their term, citizens of Pakistan will be lumbered with to deal the consequences of their decisions, while they retire in luxury along with their family in forigen shores.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top