Pakistan-Af: Operation Khyber Storm

Status
Not open for further replies.
@RescueRanger @Panzerkiel @That_Guy @Distant_Observer

Nice piece of history, every border of Afghanistan is literally fake and was marcated through negotiation with world imperial powers. If you study its history Afghanistan is actually a political project that was handed to Afghan fascists that used demographic engineering and ethnic cleansing to bring it to life by altering the region. It's like a Mini Israel.

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

From British and Russian perspectives, Afghanistan's borders were created to weaken the authority of ANY combination of (preferably all) the following powers: Iran, Pakistan, Central Asiatic/Timurid nations. Nobody in the region can take their eye off this troublesome horde that masquerades as a nation. Whomsoever the aforementioned nations would seek to rival elsewhere, they would always need to maintain a significant posture towards the barbarians sat right in the middle.

The perpetuating of Afghanistan is actually a deployment of proxies by Britain and Russia. They know it is a landlocked and infertile basket case of an economy and will never amount to anything beyond a chronic dependency because of its position. It is perfect as a proxy garrison though. That strategy is not without risks for western nations though, as we saw at the turn of this millennium.

Pakistan should seize the initiative if possible, even with Tajik and Iranian help. I'm not exaggerating when I say this is a civilisational pivot that has presented itself to us (and to Iran and Timurid nations). Kabul's fall could usher in serious regional benefits for Pakistan, the main one being that one border would suddenly become secured forever.
 
Please message her and tell her that music is banned by the Taliban this wouldn't happen.

LOL. Unlike India/Afghanistan, we are actually fine with Iran and China. Unlike both of them, who are on bad terms with all of their neighbours. So we are good with half of our neighbours and the other two are not good with anyone else in their own neighborhoods, including us. One of them (Afghanistan) is shunned internationally and the other (India) is almost isolated internationally. And their respective medias celebrate terrorism in all their neighbouring countries.

On top of that the audacity of including the flags of Bangladesh, Nepal, Srilanka, Maldives, all of whom are victims of Indian meddling/destabilization/militarization. None of them have any issues with Pakistan as of now.

These people are living in another fantasy world of their own.
 
From British and Russian perspectives, Afghanistan's borders were created to weaken the authority of ANY combination of (preferably all) the following powers: Iran, Pakistan, Central Asiatic/Timurid nations. Nobody in the region can take their eye off this troublesome horde that masquerades as a nation. Whomsoever the aforementioned nations would seek to rival elsewhere, they would always need to maintain a significant posture towards the barbarians sat right in the middle.

The perpetuating of Afghanistan is actually a deployment of proxies by Britain and Russia. They know it is a landlocked and infertile basket case of an economy and will never amount to anything beyond a chronic dependency because of its position. It is perfect as a proxy garrison though. That strategy is not without risks for western nations though, as we saw at the turn of this millennium.

Pakistan should seize the initiative if possible, even with Tajik and Iranian help. I'm not exaggerating when I say this is a civilisational pivot that has presented itself to us (and to Iran and Timurid nations). Kabul's fall could usher in serious regional benefits for Pakistan, the main one being that one border would suddenly become secured forever.
Very well written, and precisely, Afghan Pashtuns integrated into Pakistan, Tajiks into Tajikistan, Uzbeks into Uzbekistan, and so on and on ... would solve this problem completely once and for all.

That central 'basketcase' as you mentioned, would develop as a part of multiple, large scale nations rather than being an illogically trapped piece of land made of 5 nationalities who can neither live with each other, nor become a part of the logical countries around them that they should have been a part of. You are 100% correct in saying that all surrounding countries should take an initiative and get rid of the issue. Otherwise they all have stated aims of driving each other out, anyway.
 
literally who cares... Pakistan first... weeping for the enemies, really?

I am glad that most here can't have a nuanced take on things other than either kill, or you are an apologist.

No one here is saying you shouldn't bomb them, or response to a terrorist incident with a targeted strike, or take proactive action.

But anyways, drop a nuke while you're at it, finish their race...let me know how it goes.
 
This handle might not even be an Afghan. Its more like an Indian larping as usual.
Came across this profile on IG recently on a post about some American chick traveling to Pakistan and other Islamic countries. Look at the comments and then looks who's posting them:
View attachment 154828
photo-2025-10-18-12-49-18-jpg.154827
View attachment 154832
View attachment 154831
X and IG are littered with these profiles producing nothing but anti- Pakistan and Islamic narrative. They are hoping to ignite a vicious violent cycle towards Pakistanis amongst the native populations.
Brother all these scumbag accounts are operated in India

Screenshot_20251014_214021_X.jpg
 
Sincere wishes for the negotiations in Doha.

The interim Afghan government must rethink their attitude towards the Doha accord and accept the Pakistani olive branch.

Pakistan is ready to take the matter to the OIC for a composite dialogue on the situation arisen from capacity issues of the interim Afghan government.
 
we also cant have debate when you call anyone that has different opinion a right winger

Aren't those who advocate mass killing of the opposing party right wingers? What else should I call you?

Jo bolo woh keh doon ga, then you will argue the merits of the thing rather than killing everyone?
 
Brother all these scumbag accounts are operated in India

View attachment 154851
Translating the Hindi text:
War with Pakistan has started . The Taliban announce a war with Pakistan.
In the Urdu script:
پاکستان سے یُدھ شرُوع ہو چکُی ہے ۔ طالبان پاکستان سے یُدھ کی گوشناکرتا ہے۔
Yudh = war , Ghoshna = announcement / declaration.
(Wrong grammar by the way. These badly educated bots can't even write clear Hindi )

Never knew the Taliban were so fluent in "Shudh" Hindi. 😊
@Soulspokesperson
 
Translating the Hindi text:
War with Pakistan has started . The Taliban announce a war with Pakistan.
In the Urdu script:
پاکستان سے یُدھ شرُوع ہو چکُی ہے ۔ طالبان پاکستان سے یُدھ کی گوشناکرتا ہے۔
Yudh = war , Ghoshna = announcement / declaration.
(Wrong grammar by the way. These badly educated bots can't even write clear Hindi )

Never knew the Talibsn were so fluent in "Shudh" Hindi. 😊
@Soulspokesperson
Sir he must be Rahul aka Pathan Bahi's alt account on X 🤣
 
No one can be trusted with the entire geography of Afghanistan, especially when it is clear and proven time and again that whoever is at the forefront of leading Afghanistan, at any given time, practices a form of religion, which is very extreme and starkly contrasts with the form of religion that is practised in Pakistan or Iran.

Balkanization of Afghanistan Is the only viable solution to the 8 decades old threat that is posed on our western border. Division along ethnic lines ensures that there are many centres of power, and that no single sect of religion / ethnicity is strong enough to pose any real threat to our country.

If there is credible evidence that our enemies have invested heavily in Afghanistan, that a Muslim is taking the help of a non-Muslim, against a Muslim neighbour, then what kind of Islamic ideology, is preventing us from a full force attack against Afghanistan?

The extremist ideology that is practised by the militants in Afghanistan, aligns with some sections of our society that poses a credible threat and must be eliminated with a blitzkrieg. The geography of Afghanistan should be Balkanized into different ethnicities, with the provinces bordering Pakistan, being annexed, of course, after a quick referendum, and becoming a part of Pakistan, uniting the majority of the Pashtun and Baloch factions, from across the border.

Tajiks, Uzbeks, Kyrgyz and hazara population should be allowed to become independent or if they choose, to be a part of their countries of origin, bordering Afghanistan, should be allowed to become part of that specific country. The bigger land that is left to the extremists to govern, the more chances that Pakistan might be pinned down on the western border for eternity, bleeding Pakistan by a thousand cuts / wounds.

If I were to annotate this (in words) to show the Afghan provinces most aligned with Pakistan:

1. The Pashtun belt in Afghanistan (south & southeast), especially provinces like Nangarhar, Kunar, Paktia, Paktika, Khost, Kandahar, Zabul, Helmand, align with Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa & Balochistan.

2. The Baloch areas (in southwestern Afghanistan: Nimruz, parts of Helmand, etc.) align with Pakistani Balochistan.

With the Help of AI, the following should become part of Pakistan:

Afghan Provinces Closely Aligned with 🇵🇰 Pakistan
Because Afghanistan and Pakistan share a 2,640 km border (the Durand Line), several Afghan provinces directly connect — ethnically, linguistically, and economically — with adjacent Pakistani regions.
________________________________________
1. Nangarhar Province
• Bordering Pakistani areas: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Khyber & Mohmand Districts)
• Dominant ethnicity: Pashtun (99%) — tribes like Mohmand, Shinwari, and Khogyani straddle both sides of the border.
• Cultural link: Very strong — same language (Pashto), same tribal structures, and heavy cross-border movement for trade and family ties.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Peshawar region.
________________________________________
2. Kunar Province
• Bordering: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Dir, Chitral, Bajaur)
• Ethnicity: Pashtun, with Nuristani minorities.
• Link strength: Very high — linguistically and tribally connected; strong cultural overlap.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Bajaur and Lower Dir.
________________________________________
3. Paktia Province
• Bordering: Kurram District (KPK)
• Ethnicity: Pashtun (Ghilzai and Zadran tribes)
• Connection: Cross-border tribal intermarriages; similar dialects and cultural customs.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Parachinar area.
________________________________________
4. Paktika Province
• Bordering: South Waziristan (KPK) and North Waziristan
• Ethnicity: Pashtun (Ghilzai and Wazir tribes)
• Connection: Tribal overlap (Wazir and Mehsud tribes live on both sides).
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Waziristan regions.
________________________________________
5. Khost Province
• Bordering: North Waziristan
• Ethnicity: Pashtun (Zadran, Mangal)
• Connection: Same tribal confederations and cross-border kinship.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Bannu–Miranshah belt.
________________________________________
6. Kandahar Province
• Bordering: Balochistan (Quetta–Chaman region)
• Ethnicity: Pashtun (mainly Durrani confederation)
• Connection: Historical trade route; strong kinship with Pashtuns in Quetta and Zhob.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Quetta Division.
________________________________________
7. Helmand Province
• Bordering: Balochistan (Nushki and Chagai areas)
• Ethnicity: Pashtun (Noorzai, Alizai) with minority Baloch tribes.
• Connection: Trade and nomadic migration between Helmand and Pakistani Balochistan.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Nushki and Dalbandin.
________________________________________
8. Nimruz Province
• Bordering: Balochistan (Chagai District) and Iran
• Ethnicity: Baloch (majority) with Pashtun and Brahui minorities.
• Connection: Shared Baloch culture and language across Pakistan’s and Iran’s borders.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Dalbandin and Taftan region.
________________________________________
9. Zabul Province
• Bordering: Balochistan (Qila Saifullah region)
• Ethnicity: Pashtun (Hotak, Tokhi)
• Connection: Linguistic and tribal continuity with Pakistani Balochistan Pashtuns.
• Closest Pakistani correlation: Qila Saifullah and Loralai.
________________________________________
10. Kunar–Nangarhar–Paktia–Paktika–Khost–Kandahar–Zabul–Helmand–Nimruz
👉 These nine provinces form Afghanistan’s southeastern and southern belt, which:
• Shares direct borders with Pakistan.
• Is predominantly Pashtun (plus Baloch in the southwest).
• Has deep cultural, linguistic, and tribal overlap with Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan provinces.
 

Attachments

  • 20251019_034727.jpg
    20251019_034727.jpg
    2.3 MB · Views: 6
  • 96a37963a65744710389e80ea193bb7daa8c6940_1.jpg
    96a37963a65744710389e80ea193bb7daa8c6940_1.jpg
    299.9 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top