The problem is, that's their tax money, their rule, you live in Boston, that's a CA state affair, if the residents of CA don't think it's the right clause, they would have voted out Newsom in the election. So the fact that he won 3 elections (2 CA governor, one recall) didn't it tell you how CA resident sees him?
You don't use Federal power to solve state issues for the State; that's in the Constitution. I don't like a lot of stuff California does, but the thing is, that's their business; the Constitution gives the States sovereign power for a reason, and we have a constitution for a reason.
On the other hand, I will say the same thing here to you as I said to the Chinese member here that talked about the Homeless problem, it's not something you can solve with money. The homeless problem is a socio-economic issue; you can't just pump money into the issue and hope that will solve it. It does not work in Australia and Sweden, both come with huge social benefits that virtually make homelessness impossible, but still the issue persists. You can only help people who want to be helped; you can't force people to get help. That's the issue, not whether or not you had money to try and solve it.