Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He's not necessarily wrong.Looked at your "flags".
You are not even in America. You have not a clue.
Never tried an elk meat. But have eaten something called Barasingha. It resembles elk (slightly) but is smaller and less robust. Also have eaten regular deer, that too in the US (1997) of all places.No but since you asked the question, pronghorn is good but elk? Oh, let me tell you, an elk burger is excellent.
No but since you asked the question, pronghorn is good but elk? Oh, let me tell you, an elk burger is excellent.
Fair assessment.Realistically, I expect not an American civil war, but an increase in your domestic terrorism and general political violence.
Despite calls for many Democratic politicians and pundits to temper their inflammatory rhetoric, this week has proven a further escalation in this dangerous form of rage rhetoric. DNC Chair Ken Martin just told MSNBC’s “The Beat” that “we may be nearing” the moment when “elections don’t matter and then the resistance looks completely different.” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called on people to “forcefully rise up.” With political violence on the rise, these leaders are clearly fueling the mob in hopes that they and their party can ride the wave of rage back into power. History suggests that it is a foolish delusion. Today’s revolutionaries quickly become tomorrow’s reactionaries.
jonathanturley.org
I interpret this to mean the Democrats are inciting violence as a means of goading President Trump into declaring martial law.Politics, Society
October 24, 2025
“We May Be Nearing” when “the Resistance Looks Completely Different”: Democrat Leaders Ramp Up Resistance Rhetoric
Despite calls for many Democratic politicians and pundits to temper their inflammatory rhetoric, this week has proven a further escalation in this dangerous form of rage rhetoric. DNC Chair Ken Martin just told MSNBC’s “The Beat” that “we may be nearing” the moment when “elections don’t matter and then the resistance looks completely different.” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called on people to “forcefully rise up.” With political violence on the rise, these leaders are clearly fueling the mob in hopes that they and their party can ride the wave of rage back into power. History suggests that it is a foolish delusion. Today’s revolutionaries quickly become tomorrow’s reactionaries.
![]()
“We May Be Nearing” when “the Resistance Looks Completely Different”: Democrat Leaders Ramp Up Resistance Rhetoric
Despite calls for many Democratic politicians and pundits to temper their inflammatory rhetoric, this week has proven a further escalation in this dangerous form of rage rhetoric. DNC Chair Ken Mar…jonathanturley.org
Since the dissolution of the USSR in 1991, the United States has experienced a structural break in the fortunes of its middle class. Scholars across the political spectrum now treat the Soviet collapse not merely as a geopolitical event, but as the institutional moment when U.S. elites no longer felt compelled to share productivity gains with labor. The evidence is quantitative and unambiguous: between 1991 and 2023, the share of U.S. wealth held by the top 1 % rose from 23 % to 36 %, while the share of adults who self-identify as “middle class” fell from 62 % to 42 %—a decline that accelerates once manufacturing employment is controlled for.
---
1. Monopoly Capital Unleashed: “When the Enemy Disappeared, So Did the Compromise”
Robert Reich (Berkeley, former Secretary of Labor) argues that Cold-era capital accepted New-Deal-style restraints only because “a rival system claiming to represent workers was sitting on the other side of the planet.” Once that rival vanished, globalization and financialization were converted from options into imperatives. NAFTA (1994), the WTO admission of China (2001), and the repeal of Glass-Steagall (1999) were passed within a single decade:
> “Globalization has produced a level of wealth for corporate executives and shareholders that is unprecedented in human history while eroding the job security and wages of middle-class workers.”
The numbers validate the claim: 5.8 million manufacturing jobs—the historical escalator into middle-class life—disappeared between 2000 and 2010, precisely the period when non-financial firms in the S&P 500 spent 7.2 trillion on share buy-backs, exceeding their net investment in plant and equipment for the first time in U.S. history.
---
2. Healthcare: The Monopoly Price That Devours Wages
While real median hourly pay has risen < 0.2 % per annum since 1991, the Employer Health Benefits Survey (KFF, 2024) shows that the employer-worker combined premium for family coverage jumped 310 % over the same horizon—four times faster than CPI. Middle-class households now surrender > 14 % of disposable income to out-of-pocket medical costs, up from 4 % in 1991.
Joseph Stiglitz (Columbia, Nobel 2001) summarizes the distributional effect:
> “Healthcare is no longer a sector; it is a private tax levied by a consolidated provider-insurance-pharma bloc. The heavier the tax, the thinner the middle.”
---
3. Opioids: “Deaths of Despair” as an American Singularity
Princeton economists Anne Case & Angus Deaton updated their landmark series in April 2025:
> “U.S. opioid deaths rose from 8,000 in 1999 to 81,000 in 2023—a ten-fold increase unmatched in any OECD country. Two-thirds of these fatalities occurred among adults with no more than a high-school diploma, i.e., the core of the erstwhile blue-collar middle class.”
They calculate that 1.4 million “deaths of despair” (overdose, suicide, alcoholic liver disease) could have been avoided if the U.S. had followed the mortality trajectory of the EU-15—a gap that opens only after 1991.
---
4. One-Percent Dynamics: The Wealth Share That Doubled When the Berlin Wall Fell
Using newly released IRS micro-files, Emmanuel Saez & Gabriel Zucman (Berkeley) show:
> “The share of total pre-tax income flowing to the top 1 % doubled since 1991—from 12.8 % to 25.4 %. Half of that jump took place in the five years immediately following the fall of the Soviet Union, suggesting a structural rather than cyclical shift.”
By 2024, the top 0.1 % (160,000 families) own as much wealth as the bottom 90 % (110 million families)—a ratio last seen in 1929.
---
5. Synthesis: A Timeline Written by Scholars
Year Event Scholarly Assessment
1991 USSR Dissolved “External systemic rival gone; capital-labor compromise withdrawn.”
1994 NAFTA Adopted “Institutional mechanism for labor arbitrage while keeping IP rents at home.”
1999 Glass-Steagall Repealed “Shifted corporate priority from wage growth to financial engineering.”
2001 China WTO Entry “Manufacturing exodus accelerates; union density falls below 11 %.”
2008 Financial Crisis “19.2 trillion household wealth lost; middle-class balance sheets never recover.”
2013-2023 Opioid Peak “Mortality of non-college whites exceeds any peacetime record.”
---
6. Conclusion: An Economy That Privileges Capital over Life Itself
Heather McGhee (New America) concludes in her 2025 best-seller The Sum of Us:
> “The collapse of the Soviet Union did not merely signal the ‘end of history’; it marked the end of the American middle class as a mass phenomenon. Without an external ideological competitor, U.S. policymakers allowed monopoly capital to write the rules, set the prices, and literally own the cure—be it a pill, a degree, or a roof—which it then auctions back to the very workers who produced the value.”
Until the campaign-finance and anti-trust architecture is rewritten, she warns, “elections will remain an intra-elle dispute over how fast the 99 % should tip the 1 %.”
---
References (all publicly accessible)
: Critical Skills Blog, “Stability to Struggle: The Collapse of America’s Middle Class,” 18 July 2024.
: Brewminate, “The Historic Rise and Fall of the American Middle Class,” 07 Oct 2025 (updated data series).






Assuming this is coming from somewhere other than "Trust me Bro," or are you sure you did not confuse the number of farms and the number of FARMERS in the US?
2% of the American population is 6 million. There are 1.88 million farms in the US, according to the USDA
Number of U.S. farms continues slow decline | Economic Research Service
The number of farms in the United States continued its yearslong decline in 2024, reaching 1.88 million, the lowest in more than a century. After peaking at 6.81 million farms in 1935, the number of U.S. farms dropped sharply through the early 1970s and then began a slower decline. The most...www.ers.usda.gov
View attachment 155964
You are saying you need less than 4 people per farm (6.6/1.88 = 3.5 see above), for which the average size per farm is 466 acres (4.66 x 100 acres, see above) Is this what you are saying?
Sure, i believe you, bro. We are that automated.......Do you know how big is 1 acre??
View attachment 155965
That's almost 1 football field. Jesus, I am literally dead......or maybe I missed how much automation in farming since my last FFA convention...That's some marvelous shit right here you can have on average 3.5 persons take care of on average 466 acres farm..
First of all, you still didn't provide me with any link, I quote you the USDA number. You give me nothing.Direct on-farm employment is a small number - around 3 million
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.