Some really bad publicity for Asim Munir and his goons from these events.
The BBC is the first media organisation to gain access to the city and speak to people on the ground in Rawalakot.
www.bbc.com
Now world will consider Pakistan the bad guy in Kashmir as memories of insurgency in IoK are long forgotten.
Come on mate. You're way smarter than this. BBC??
You need only look at the severe copenomics at play by hindutva editors who think this nomenclature "PAK" for Pakistan administered Kashmir will actually find credence in any official capacity. Never heard such embarrassing garbage in my life.
BBC and AJ, due to embedded hindutva concerns, are quite DESPERATE to invert the realities of Indian occupied Kashmir and Azad Kashmir.
Caroline Davies is herself a cheap shill for ZHABBC (zio-hindutva administered BBC).
Just follow the BBC "South Asia team", which is 99% you know who, for a short period to ascertain their loyalties. They spend all their time airbrushing and "explaining because misunderstanding needs simple rectifying saar!" the faults of Hindustan for the pleasure of a certain group of licence payers.
Even when the deaths of climbers on Broad Peak was being followed, the Indian contingent were desperate to point out "Pakistan administered Gilgit-Baltistan" for effing days on end like the halfwits they are instead of getting on with reporting ground realities. Finally a Nepali reporter wrote an article that simply stated "Pakistan" and ignored the garbage spouted by the Indian overwatch.
Some vile ex-NDTV filth Adwaidh Rajan has just landed a sports posting at BBC and has immediately started humiliating himself with garbage about how wonderful IPL ownership of Hundred cricket franchises is "for the game of cricket". White people are immediately humiliating this man in the comments for his bile inducing loyalty to the country of his origin rather than that which employs him - why can't Pakistanis see the wood from the trees when it comes to BBC reportage? They have one default position. Any deviation from that is worth mentioning certainly, but this par for the course tripe??
Really sorry for the OT rambling but folks need to figure out why certain agencies use certain language based on the wider scheme at play.
