Attack on Jaffer Express

At best, she’s an "ideological opportunist," using the language of human rights to mask her support for violent agendas. Still, she's a step above the militants, who rely on guns rather than words.... occasionally offering arguments that are, at times, even convincing.

Agreed

But at least we shouldn't be expected to consider her human rights activist when we know she is an ideological oportunist
 
Let me share the "rights" that father of Mahrang and the organization he belonged to struggles for
Wasnt her father Langov ( forgot his full name ) also a part of BLA? No wonder she turns a blind eye to the killing of innocent miners, workers and labourers from other provinces.
Balochistan is a Baloch land only (ignore all pashtuns, hazaras, sindhis and brahvis living in Balochistan) and anyone who doesn't agree to this is an occupier and it is perfectly legitimate to kill an occupier
Baloch arent even the majority in Balochistan. This wet dreams of some will remain wet dreams. But the problem needs to be tackled somehow? We cant remain in a perpetual internal war. Establishment really needs to take a step back and **** off back to GHQ. They haven't been a force of good in Balochistan. As a native of that land, I know that well.
 
Agreed

But at least we shouldn't be expected to consider her human rights activist when we know she is an ideological oportunist

True human rights activism requires impartiality and condemnation of all forms of violence, regardless of the perpetrator.

Anyone who doesn't fit this criteria is just an opportunist with their own agenda...
 
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
Wasnt her father Langov ( forgot his full name ) also a part of BLA? No wonder she turns a blind eye to the killing of innocent miners, workers and labourers from other provinces..

Yup. His name was Abdul Ghaffar Langove. Before Bashir Zeb and Allah Nazar there was Abdul Ghaffatr Langove. Here is an old newspaper cutting about him

20250321_015258.jpg

He was a militant. Not a peaceful political leader or worker. These people literally have blood on their hands. Blood of punjabis, blood of other non Balochs, blood of Baloch themselves

Baloch arent even the majority in Balochistan. This wet dreams of some will remain wet dreams. But the problem needs to be tackled somehow? We cant remain in a perpetual internal war. Establishment really needs to take a step back and **** off back to GHQ. They haven't been a force of good in Balochistan. As a native of that land, I know that well.

Obviously we shouldn't be in perpetual war. Whether in KPK or Balochistan. But we need to beat BLA militarily before we go for any political solution to this problem. Without no political solution would be possible. Also ghq should be held accountable for failing to beat BLA militarily. Other than that all their misdeeds or corruption should also be criticized but bla should be considered as terrorists and should be treated as terrorists. They shouldn't be let to hide behind missing persons or lack of infrastructure or poverty.
 
So this is what being a hard state means?

Picking up university professors and stopping protests?

I mean does no one in the room have more IQ than the room temperature?

Stop the terrorists, do your fckng job, kill them in the mountains, and then these voices in colleges etc. will gradually diminish.

There's alot of leftists and marxist fringe movements in Pakistan too, but all they can do is write or speak in front of 20 people. And that doesn't really do jack.

Solve the military problem militarily, solve the political problem politically. Magr the moment someone suggests this they are labeled Taliban Khan. Morons.
 
So this is what being a hard state means?

Picking up university professors and stopping protests?

I mean does no one in the room have more IQ than the room temperature?

Stop the terrorists, do your fckng job, kill them in the mountains, and then these voices in colleges etc. will gradually diminish.

There's alot of leftists and marxist fringe movements in Pakistan too, but all they can do is write or speak in front of 20 people. And that doesn't really do jack.

Solve the military problem militarily, solve the political problem politically. Magr the moment someone suggests this they are labeled Taliban Khan. Morons.

Unfortunate, the generals don't want to solve political matters politically.
 
Sir I have been saying the same thing in this thread since past few days. I am certainly not in denial. There is no military solution to the Balochs issue. Until good governance doesn't come, state doesn't dismantle the Sardar system, bring education and development, no amount of military actions would solve the insurgency. Baloch need political rights and representation and a platform to raise their concerns. This has been my stance since the start.

But I would never support that charlatan named Mahrang. Anyone who's a BLA BLF sympthazer is a traitor to Pakistan. Those doing enforced disappearances and extra judicial killings also are traitors.
Pakistan should do the Iran method on Baloch
 
So this is what being a hard state means?

Picking up university professors and stopping protests?

I mean does no one in the room have more IQ than the room temperature?

Stop the terrorists, do your fckng job, kill them in the mountains, and then these voices in colleges etc. will gradually diminish.

There's alot of leftists and marxist fringe movements in Pakistan too, but all they can do is write or speak in front of 20 people. And that doesn't really do jack.

Solve the military problem militarily, solve the political problem politically. Magr the moment someone suggests this they are labeled Taliban Khan. Morons.

Update on hard state:

We have now started firing on protestors in Quetta.

Going awfully well this.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Pakistan Defence Latest

Country Watch Latest

Latest Posts

Back
Top