Attack on Pakistan Parliament on 9th September: A Black Day for Democracy

[Cash gk]

On September 9th, a tragic event took place in Pakistan that has shaken the foundations of its democratic system. Armed men, wearing masks, stormed the country's parliament and attacked the building, resulting in the kidnapping of several members of parliament (MPs) from the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. This act of violence has been described as a black day for the country’s democratic values. According to eyewitness accounts, the attackers entered the parliament building with weapons and took control of the situation. They targeted PTI lawmakers specifically, abducting some of them in a shocking display of force. This unprecedented event has raised serious concerns about the safety of elected representatives and the state of democracy in Pakistan. Parliament is meant to be a place where political debates and decisions are made peacefully, representing the voice of the people. An attack like this, right at the heart of the nation’s political system, is a direct blow to the democratic process. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has condemned the attack, stating that it goes against the core principles of democracy. The use of violence to silence or intimidate elected representatives is a dangerous trend that threatens the very fabric of the country’s political system. For a country that has faced challenges to its democracy over the years, this attack is a disturbing reminder of the risks that remain. Many political commentators and civil society members have expressed concern that this incident is part of a broader pattern of political instability and violence in the country. They warn that if such actions go unchecked, it could lead to further erosion of trust in democratic institutions. The attack also highlights the growing political tensions in Pakistan. PTI, led by Imran Khan, has been at odds with several other powerful entities in the country, including the military, judiciary, and political opponents. This tension has been building for some time, and the attack on parliament may be a reflection of these deeper conflicts. There is a need for all political parties to come together to address these tensions and ensure that violence does not become a common tool for settling political disputes. In the aftermath of this attack, there is a call for stronger measures to protect elected representatives and ensure the safety of the country’s democratic institutions. This event has shown that more needs to be done to safeguard the political system from violence and intimidation. The attack on September 10th is a reminder that democracy in Pakistan must be protected at all costs. It is a time for unity and for all political actors to work together to ensure that such events do not happen again. Pakistan’s democratic future depends on the strength of its institutions and the commitment of its people to uphold democratic values. This tragic day will be remembered as a dark moment in Pakistan's political history, but it also serves as a call to action to strengthen democracy and prevent future attacks on its institutions.

 

[Mr X]

Which part of parliament did the attackers burn?

Where is the evidence of damages?

Did they also burn the statues of Quaid or Liaquat Ali Khan?

If no damage was caused then how is it an attack to the parliament?

The most I see is the violation of law to arrest the alleged culprits? The culprits must be arrested and trialled/punished.

Imagine Taliban enter the parliament building, would you say that the military action to get rid of terrorists is an attack on the parliament?

I condemn the 9th September incident but it wasn’t an attack on the parliament but the parliamentarians

 

[Cash gk]

Which part of parliament did the attackers burn?

Where is the evidence of damages?

Did they also burn the statues of Quaid or Liaquat Ali Khan?

If no damage was caused then how is it an attack to the parliament?

The most I see is the violation of law to arrest the alleged culprits? The culprits must be arrested and trialled/punished.

Imagine Taliban enter the parliament building, would you say that the military action to get rid of terrorists is an attack on the parliament?

I condemn the 9th September incident but it wasn’t an attack on the parliament but the parliamentarians

If the Speaker denies giving permission for police or military forces to enter Parliament on the Parliament floor, it means that any entry by such forces would be unauthorized. According to Pakistan’s Constitution (Article 66) and Rules of Procedure (Rule 18), without the Speaker’s approval, their presence would violate the law protecting Parliament’s sanctity. This denial would confirm that no lawful permission was granted for their entry or actions inside the Parliament. They were not terrorists.they were elected member of parliament keep in mind Brother. are you calling them terrorist?

 

[Cash gk]

This will help many to understand

 

[Mr X]

If the Speaker denies giving permission for police or military forces to enter Parliament on the Parliament floor, it means that any entry by such forces would be unauthorized. According to Pakistan’s Constitution (Article 66) and Rules of Procedure (Rule 18), without the Speaker’s approval, their presence would violate the law protecting Parliament’s sanctity. This denial would confirm that no lawful permission was granted for their entry or actions inside the Parliament. They were not they were elected member of parliament keep in mind Brother. are you calling them terrorist.

My point is, there is a difference between

Attack on the parliament

Vs

Attack on the parliament building

Vs

Attack on the sanctity of the parliament

Vs

Attack on the parliamentarians

While I condemn them all, the nature of these attacks can vary from small violation of rules to the treason.

What you mentioned was the exaggeration and the reality is the violation of law and those who did it, those individuals must be arrested and trialed.

 

[Dalit]

On September 9th, a tragic event took place in Pakistan that has shaken the foundations of its democratic system. Armed men, wearing masks, stormed the country's parliament and attacked the building, resulting in the kidnapping of several members of parliament (MPs) from the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. This act of violence has been described as a black day for the country’s democratic values. According to eyewitness accounts, the attackers entered the parliament building with weapons and took control of the situation. They targeted PTI lawmakers specifically, abducting some of them in a shocking display of force. This unprecedented event has raised serious concerns about the safety of elected representatives and the state of democracy in Pakistan. Parliament is meant to be a place where political debates and decisions are made peacefully, representing the voice of the people. An attack like this, right at the heart of the nation’s political system, is a direct blow to the democratic process. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has condemned the attack, stating that it goes against the core principles of democracy. The use of violence to silence or intimidate elected representatives is a dangerous trend that threatens the very fabric of the country’s political system. For a country that has faced challenges to its democracy over the years, this attack is a disturbing reminder of the risks that remain. Many political commentators and civil society members have expressed concern that this incident is part of a broader pattern of political instability and violence in the country. They warn that if such actions go unchecked, it could lead to further erosion of trust in democratic institutions. The attack also highlights the growing political tensions in Pakistan. PTI, led by Imran Khan, has been at odds with several other powerful entities in the country, including the military, judiciary, and political opponents. This tension has been building for some time, and the attack on parliament may be a reflection of these deeper conflicts. There is a need for all political parties to come together to address these tensions and ensure that violence does not become a common tool for settling political disputes. In the aftermath of this attack, there is a call for stronger measures to protect elected representatives and ensure the safety of the country’s democratic institutions. This event has shown that more needs to be done to safeguard the political system from violence and intimidation. The attack on September 10th is a reminder that democracy in Pakistan must be protected at all costs. It is a time for unity and for all political actors to work together to ensure that such events do not happen again. Pakistan’s democratic future depends on the strength of its institutions and the commitment of its people to uphold democratic values. This tragic day will be remembered as a dark moment in Pakistan's political history, but it also serves as a call to action to strengthen democracy and prevent future attacks on its institutions.

It wasn't an attack. It was staged. We know by exactly who.

 

[Cash gk]

My point is, there is a difference between

Attack on the parliament

Vs

Attack on the parliament building

Vs

Attack on the sanctity of the parliament

Vs

Attack on the parliamentarians

While I condemn them all, the nature of these attacks can vary from small violation of rules to the treason.

What you mentioned was the exaggeration and the reality is the violation of law and those who did it, those individuals must be arrested and trialed.

I don’t think even you watched those speeches. Even speaker 47 himself accepted that it was attack. I am 2000 percent sure that things going to be very different for those who betrayed Pakistan in last two years..

 

[Cash gk]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1834923888620253592

 

[Jango]

I think at this point our whole history is pretty black, especially the past few years.

 

[Oscar]

I think at this point our whole history is pretty black, especially the past few years.

Can't help it if the elite are fans of Mick Jagger.

 

[Cash gk]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1834865465497469256

 

[Cash gk]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1834863997868470520

 

[AjayGhatak]

On September 9th, a tragic event took place in Pakistan that has shaken the foundations of its democratic system. Armed men, wearing masks, stormed the country's parliament and attacked the building, resulting in the kidnapping of several members of parliament (MPs) from the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. This act of violence has been described as a black day for the country’s democratic values. According to eyewitness accounts, the attackers entered the parliament building with weapons and took control of the situation. They targeted PTI lawmakers specifically, abducting some of them in a shocking display of force. This unprecedented event has raised serious concerns about the safety of elected representatives and the state of democracy in Pakistan. Parliament is meant to be a place where political debates and decisions are made peacefully, representing the voice of the people. An attack like this, right at the heart of the nation’s political system, is a direct blow to the democratic process. The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) has condemned the attack, stating that it goes against the core principles of democracy. The use of violence to silence or intimidate elected representatives is a dangerous trend that threatens the very fabric of the country’s political system. For a country that has faced challenges to its democracy over the years, this attack is a disturbing reminder of the risks that remain. Many political commentators and civil society members have expressed concern that this incident is part of a broader pattern of political instability and violence in the country. They warn that if such actions go unchecked, it could lead to further erosion of trust in democratic institutions. The attack also highlights the growing political tensions in Pakistan. PTI, led by Imran Khan, has been at odds with several other powerful entities in the country, including the military, judiciary, and political opponents. This tension has been building for some time, and the attack on parliament may be a reflection of these deeper conflicts. There is a need for all political parties to come together to address these tensions and ensure that violence does not become a common tool for settling political disputes. In the aftermath of this attack, there is a call for stronger measures to protect elected representatives and ensure the safety of the country’s democratic institutions. This event has shown that more needs to be done to safeguard the political system from violence and intimidation. The attack on September 10th is a reminder that democracy in Pakistan must be protected at all costs. It is a time for unity and for all political actors to work together to ensure that such events do not happen again. Pakistan’s democratic future depends on the strength of its institutions and the commitment of its people to uphold democratic values. This tragic day will be remembered as a dark moment in Pakistan's political history, but it also serves as a call to action to strengthen democracy and prevent future attacks on its institutions.

Can you put the link to original article? Source link is not clickable.

 

[Khansaheeb]

My point is, there is a difference between

Attack on the parliament

Vs

Attack on the parliament building

Vs

Attack on the sanctity of the parliament

Vs

Attack on the parliamentarians

While I condemn them all, the nature of these attacks can vary from small violation of rules to the treason.

What you mentioned was the exaggeration and the reality is the violation of law and those who did it, those individuals must be arrested and trialed.

Little by little from petty crimes to heinous crimes, from hurling threats to assaults' and kidnapping, Pakistan's pillar of democracy, the core values of right to vote and freedom of speech and expression are crumbling.

When rogues attack and kidnap parliamentarians, it's an attack on democracy and the people of Pakistan, both symbolically and functionally. Pakistan's democracy is supposed to be built on the rule of law, which ensures that everyone, including law makers, are subject to legal processes and protections.

Attacking or kidnapping parliamentarians shows a blatant disregard for these principles, suggesting that power or violence, rather than law, can determine political outcomes. This undermines citizens' trust in the justice system and government institutions. The fact that those who are supposed to protect failed in their primary duty is a damning indictment of behind the scenes nefarious actors.

An attack on Pakistan's parliamentarians , whatever their views and alignments, is an attack on the People of Pakistan and a challenge to their fundamental right to vote and elect and choose who they deem fit to represent them. Normalizing such heinous crime on democracy isn't going to bode well as such actions will only divide and contribute towards a downward spiral of anarchy and chaos. If foreign hands are involved then they need to be chopped, if internal criminals are involved then they need to be caught and incarcerated. We must all cherish and uphold the democratic values of Pakistan else we will slip into dictatorship and civil war.

 

[Khansaheeb]

Can't help it if the elite are fans of Mick Jagger.

Lol, shows your age and mine!