BananaRepublic
Trusted Member
@MNZGamerX @BananaRepublic
Have you both looked at the list of items in the procurement list? It's not just the jets, its everything from radar infrastructure to short range (MANPADS) and medium range SAMs to drones.
Why are you both obsessing over just the jets?
Be it EFT or JF 17 or J10, you need jets to act as deterrent. Iran war clearly showed that missiles alone can only take you so far. You need jets to protect airspace in addition to AD and prevent enemies from freely roaming in your territory and bombing at will. Did you know that even Iran with its 1970s jets launched attacks in UAE along with the drones?
And 10-16 jets sounds small, and it is small. But considering the position BAF is in, it is a start. You don't build a modern air force overnight. Are we expecting Bangladesh to buy 600 jets to compete with India?
Also - we are not only talking about India here. We have another potential threat to our south who are on par with us in terms of military strength. Like India, they also have a hatred for Muslim Bengalis. Had we been militarily capable, we could have prevented the entire Rohingya debacle.
BAF being limited to search and rescue ops is the most defeatist statement I have heard. But this is nothing new. This has been propagated by BAL since the independence.
If smaller countries should refrain from building an air force, why is Taiwan bothering to arm itself to the teeth. Even with US support, it is puny in front of China.
The objective is not to compete or even win the war against a superior power. Rather to make the victory very expensive for the aggressor to the extent the cost-benefit ratio no longer justifies an invasion.
Let's get back to topic. If you both want to discuss this further, I can move these conversations to an appropriate thread.
Why would an enemy roam Bangladeshi sky?
Have we got deep underground missile cities or nuclear facilities hidden in mountains?
Why would either India or Burma bother with fighter jets when they can shoot anything they want from their Borders.
Unless you have “iron dome” tech - there’s no protection from such attacks.
But even “iron dome” is proving its limitation.
In summary, India would just kill Bangladesh economically through a naval blockade.
And Burma would just bomb population centres and economic hubs indiscriminately.
So, spending money on all those weapons is just chest thumping of the most expensive kind.
For some reason - you guys need the weapons to satisfy your inferiority complex.
Whereas people like me are proud that we are the only Muslim country not bordered by another Muslim country.
We are one of the few homogeneous ethno states.
Lots of countries are being held together through military coercion - some might not survive in their current form into the 2050s - despite their chest thumping military.
Yes!
Our geography and size means we cannot be a military power.
But the makeup and history makes us resilient to ethnic warfare and outside meddling.
Unlike most of our neighbours - we have the capacity to be a peaceful country.
We should be grateful for that!



