This is for you,
@Joe Shearer and Pak brothers…
I can see where you are coming from with regards to providing conventional deterrence against India.
Big hole in your strategy is geography and nuclear bombs.
India will never escalate given the cost due to geography and triggering a nuclear response.
India will have no reservations against BD.
It will be like how Israel deals with Iran (Pakistan) and Palestine (Bangladesh).
Given the population density of Bangladesh even minor skirmishes endangers millions of people.
Furthermore, financial cost of a conventional force deterrence against such a large country with big defence budget - is extremely prohibitive.
It means Bangladesh making the sort of strategic pivot that Pakistan made in the 1960s. Including ceding land to China and agreeing to become a buffer for USA.
This kind of budgetary and geopolitical choices will turn Bangladesh into a military state.
No civilian government can sustain that level of defence spending.
Spending commitment will have to be even higher for BD given where it is in terms of defence infra.
And BD’s economic partners in the west also do not have an appetite for such a build up.
Bangladesh’s population and geography is perfect for guerrilla warfare - given the large border - India will find it almost impossible. Hence it is a mighty deterrence.