Chines Prisident Reject Modi Dinner | Indian BRICS Failed | Modi Humilated infront of World

It's a messaging of the highest order from the highest authority as far as the Chines POV vis-a-vis Bharat. As for the Bharati leadership, it should be the time to panic....

Looks like Tibet being the palm and Ladakh, Sikim, South Tibet etc. being its fingers is no hollow slogan. The Chinese folks consider it as the symbol of their "century of humiliation". Now that they're getting stronger and stronger, reversing that humiliation appears to be topping their agenda....
 
Xi left asap after he saw what happened to the Iranian president

A viral video showing Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian bending down in front of a Hindu spiritual leader in New Delhi was misinterpreted and cropped online. While social media users and some media outlets claimed he was bowing to touch the seer's feet, the full footage and multiple witnesses confirmed he was actually picking up a piece of paper and a pen that had dropped to the floor. [1, 2, 3]

What Actually Happened
    • The Incident: During a cultural dialogue at the 2026 BRICS Summit in India, a document or magazine dropped to the floor while being handed over. [1, 2]
    • The Gesture: In an act of courtesy, President Pezeshkian immediately bent down to pick it up. Simultaneously, Hindu spiritual leader Jagadguru Swami Satishacharya and Jain monk Acharya Lokesh Muni also leaned down to help. [1, 2]
    • The Manipulation: The viral clip was tightly cropped to hide the floor, removing the dropped paper from view and making it appear as though the president was performing a traditional charan sparsh (seeking blessings by touching feet). [1, 2]
Both the Iranian Embassy and eyewitnesses present at the event released statements confirming that the gesture was purely out of humility to retrieve the fallen paper
 
Can't deny the "spirit" of Pakistani members on this forum... If they got a dollar for changing goalposts everyone would have been a millionaire

First, Xi won't come, then joint statement won't be issued, then Xi won't have bilateral, and now Xi didn't invite dinner. All this while when Xi hasn't visit Pakistan in 2015 - thats more than a decade. I don't understand how these folks compute.
 
Master Chief said:
The ability of some people to delude themselves into thinking medals should be awarded for basic functionality never ceases to amaze me.

What is even remotely "successful" about repeating a few non-specific soundbytes about current affairs that have been said numerous times already for many months (and even years, regarding 2 state solution)?

You had some folks round to hold hands and pose for photos, job done. What "success" is this? You're a member of BRICS. This is your effing JOB to host the summit on rotation.

Coming up on CNN18 - Indian man congratulates own gastrointestinal tract for producing gas.
Click to expand...
What is definition of failure and success then for such occasions in your book?
 
Raj-Hindustani said:
Big words and title.

Xi missing the dinner does not make the summit a failure... Give any solid evidence pls for failure.


BRICS 2026 — Success in summary:

New Delhi Declaration adopted by consensus.

Strong condemnation of terrorism, including the Pahalgam attack.

Support for Palestine, including a ceasefire in Gaza, humanitarian aid and the two-state solution.

Greater cooperation on trade, local currencies, AI, energy and technology.
Push for greater representation of the

Global South in global institutions.
Continued India–China diplomatic engagement despite tensions.

Overall, the summit produced concrete joint positions
Click to expand...

Biggest disadvantage for India is its growing population and not enough public toilets.
 
Pakistanithinktank said:
Biggest disadvantage for India is its growing population and not enough public toilets.
Click to expand...
Does Pakistan not face the same issue? Last time I checked, despite having a much smaller population than India, Pakistan also faces significant sanitation and public-toilet challenges. So blaming India’s population alone oversimplifies the issue.
 
Raj-Hindustani said:
I guess there is another story - if even one go, another is there--

View attachment 215673
Click to expand...
The main source of India’s hostility toward the West during the Cold War was Western support for and arms supplies to Pakistan. This became particularly evident during the 1971 India-Pakistan War, when the Nixon administration fully supported Pakistan and the U.S. Seventh Fleet’s Task Force 74, including the USS Enterprise, moved toward the Bay of Bengal. This was an attempt to pressure India to stop the war.

The experience contributed to India’s determination to develop greater strategic autonomy and an independent nuclear capability. India conducted its first nuclear test at Pokhran in May 1974, (as a response to an American threat in 1971); India also cited broader strategic and technological considerations, including its security environment and opposition to the discriminatory NPT.
 
Raj-Hindustani said:
I guess there is another story - if even one go, another is there--

View attachment 215673
Click to expand...
If they give you everything than why is India going around begging for technology all the time? When war broke out in operation sindoor who came to India's aid or helped India? Trump just laughed at 7 indian fighters getting shot down is that support?
 
retaxis said:
If they give you everything than why is India going around begging for technology all the time? When war broke out in operation sindoor who came to India's aid or helped India? Trump just laughed at 7 indian fighters getting shot down is that support?
Click to expand...
India does not “beg” the West for technology. India buys what it needs while building its own capabilities and maintaining strategic autonomy. Every major military power does the same.

The real issue is that India does not want U.S. or any other country trying to restrain India from responding to Pakistan. India is fully aware of Pakistan’s nuclear posture and has developed the military capabilities and strategic planning necessary to deal with the nuclear threat.

India will make its own decisions about when and how to respond, regardless of repeated warnings from Washington about supposed nuclear escalation.

We cooperate with the West where our interests align, but India does not outsource its security decisions to Washington.
 
Jungle Book said:
India does not “beg” the West for technology. India buys what it needs while building its own capabilities and maintaining strategic autonomy. Every major military power does the same.

The real issue is that India does not want U.S. or any other country trying to restrain India from responding to Pakistan. India is fully aware of Pakistan’s nuclear posture and has developed the military capabilities and strategic planning necessary to deal with the nuclear threat.

India will make its own decisions about when and how to respond, regardless of repeated warnings from Washington about supposed nuclear escalation.

We cooperate with the West where our interests align, but India does not outsource its security decisions to Washington.
Click to expand...
Yes but i am referring to the picture of India having all these allies yet none showed up. More media bs like how Iranian president forgot Islam and started hinduism by touching the feet
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • ... and 1 more.
    • Total: 21 (members: 4, guests: 17)

    Pakistan Defence Latest

    Country Watch Latest

    Latest Posts

    Share this page

    Back
    Top