Covid-19 News and Discussions

Novavax stock rises on COVID vaccine delivery projections​


 

GOP’s Lawyer Asks Fauci Point Blank If COVID Was Possibly Caused By A Lab-Related Accident​


 

FDA advisers urge targeting JN.1 strain in recipe for fall's COVID vaccines​


 

Los Angeles may end vaccine mandate on Tuesday​


 

Friday's Pandemic Update: A New Covid Variant Is Leading The Way In The US​


 

Health leaders warn of COVID-19 spike in Hawaii hospitals​


 

COVID is coming for Calif., and it's already hitting the Bay Area the hardest​

Here's how to protect yourself amid rising case rates​

By Ariana Bindman, News Features Reporter June 12, 2024


A view of the city skyline through the Golden Gate Bridge from the Marin Highlands in San Francisco.
mbell/Getty Images
If you or any of your friends have gotten sick with COVID-19 recently, you’re not the only ones: Case rates are rising in the Bay Area and the proof is in the pipes. According to the California Department of Public Health, the region now has the most viral wastewater than anywhere else in California.
0012000001fxZm9AAE







Skip Ad


In an email to SFGATE, Amanda Bidwell, a wastewater researcher and data analyst at Stanford, said that over the past 21 days “consistently high concentrations” of SARS-CoV-2 have been detected in wastewater samples collected across San Francisco.
“Currently we are seeing some of the highest concentrations we’ve ever measured” at these locations, Bidwell continued. And across San Francisco, the levels are approaching those last seen in December and January. Because individuals shed the virus before getting tested, this method of monitoring wastewater helps predict upcoming surges while including data from those who are asymptomatic.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad

Aside from San Francisco, as of June 11, data showed that COVID levels were also high in Vallejo; Novato; western Contra Costa County; Sausalito; Palo Alto; Sunnyvale; and San Jose. And the virus isn’t confined to just the Bay Area, either.
“Wastewater concentrations of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in San Francisco, as in many sites across California, have been increasing, which suggest that COVID-19 cases are increasing,” CDPH press representatives told SFGATE in a written statement.
It’s a trend that has played out in previous years. The San Francisco Department of Public Health told SFGATE that COVID cases have typically risen around late spring through late summer.
“Last year we saw a summer peak start in early July 2023, and it appears that this may be happening a little bit earlier this year compared to last year,” Bidwell told SFGATE via email.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad

Dr. Peter Chin-Hong, an infectious diseases specialist at UCSF, told SFGATE that reinfection is “almost like clockwork” — though it’s mostly biological, it’s also driven by human behavior.
Last August, the triple threat of summer travel, decreased immunity and debilitating heat waves led to a “swell” of COVID cases, he previously told SFGATE. Our antibodies decline after about four months, meaning that anyone who previously got sick in the winter will probably fall ill again around the summer.
“I think we will see an increase in cases, for sure,” Chin-Hong said. “I mean, we already have. … My prediction is that it will be lower than last year, just because we have more immunity. But that doesn’t mean that some people won’t get seriously ill.”
The prevalence of new variants, combined with graduation celebrations and international travel, is also likely contributing to the most recent rise in COVID wastewater levels, Chin-Hong explained. Fewer people are also getting the latest vaccines: Just 14% of California’s population has received an up-to-date dose, CDPH data shows, indicating that there’s less immunity overall.
ADVERTISEMENT
Article continues below this ad

To stay protected, Chin-Hong recommends getting the latest vaccine, packing a mask for upcoming trips, and monitoring COVID levels in any areas you plan on traveling to. Those who are especially immunocompromised can also look into requesting Paxlovid in advance, he continued.
“Staying up to date on vaccination is the best way to protect against severe COVID-19,” the SFDPH wrote. “We encourage people to ask their healthcare provider or visit vaccines.gov to find a vaccine near them.”
 

London hospital worker fired for refusing COVID-19 shot must get job back, arbitrator rules​

Punishment should have been 30-day suspension, not termination, arbitrator says​

matthew-trevithick.jpg

Matthew Trevithick · CBC News · Posted: Jun 12, 2024 5:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: June 12
Aerial of London Children's Hospital sign.

Children's Hospital at London Health Sciences Centre in London, Ont. as seen from a drone in November 2022. (Yan Theoret/CBC News)

Social Sharing​

  • Facebook
  • X
  • Email
  • Reddit
  • LinkedIn
A London woman fired nearly three years ago by London Health Sciences Centre (LHSC) over its staff COVID-19 vaccination policy has had her termination reversed by an Ontario grievance arbitrator.
In his ruling, dated May 30, arbitrator Mark Wright ordered Jill Thompson be reinstated at the hospital, where she had worked for 18 years before her Oct. 22, 2021 dismissal, including as a counsellor in the child and adolescent mental health care program at Children's Hospital.
"I have found that (LHSC's) discharge of (Thompson) lacked just cause. I have ordered that (Thompson) be reinstated and that a 30-day disciplinary suspension be substituted for the discharge," Wright states in his decision.
The grievance, filed on Thompson's behalf by her union, did not challenge the reasonableness of the policy, but argued the dismissal lacked just cause contrary to the collective agreement between LHSC and Unifor Local 27.
Reached through social media, Thompson declined to comment to CBC News. In a statement, LHSC said it respected the arbitrator's ruling and will work with Unifor on next steps.
A request for comment from Unifor Local 27 was not returned by publishing time. The lawyer who represented the union during arbitration told CBC News they were not in a position to provide a statement on its behalf.
Protesters stood outside of Victoria Hospital in London to protest the vaccine mandate on Monday.

Protesters stood outside of Victoria Hospital in London to protest the vaccine mandate in the fall of 2021. (James Chaarani/CBC)
LHSC's COVID-19 vaccination policy, unveiled Aug. 31, 2021, ordered staff to receive a first dose no later than Sept. 8, a second by Oct. 8, and be fully vaccinated by Oct. 22, an agreed statement of facts in Wright's decision says.
It followed a provincial directive that hospitals implement vaccine policies for employees by Sept. 7, 2021. Staff would have to provide proof of full vaccination, a medical reason for not being vaccinated, or complete an educational session.
The Delta variant was circulating at the time, raising concerns of a winter COVID-19 surge — a surge which came as a result of the Omicron variant.
Thompson expressed anxiety around the mandate in an email to LHSC on Oct. 1, the agreed statement of facts says. It notes she hadn't filed proof of vaccination, or raised medical or human rights grounds for an exemption, by Oct. 15 when she met with LHSC administration.
During a three-minute meeting, Thompson told the hospital she was aware of the policy and the Oct. 22 deadline, that she was not vaccinated against COVID-19, and that she did not plan to be, the statement of facts says.
Thompson testified at arbitration that she was informed of her termination after telling the hospital of her intent to remain unvaccinated. Under cross-examination, she confirmed she was aware termination was a possibility.
She added she remained unvaccinated, and now had "more information available to her" which reinforced her view to remain so.

The arguments​

LHSC argued the firing had just cause as Thompson planned to remain unvaccinated despite the policy, "which the parties have agreed was a reasonable response," to the pandemic, the decision reads.
"(LHSC) argues that the policy was clear on its face… and submits that the case law establishes that the breach of a reasonable mandatory vaccination policy gives grounds for discipline," Wright writes.
At least 99 employees were fired by LHSC for not complying with the mandate, and 99 per cent of workers were fully vaccinated by Oct. 22, 2021, the decision document says.
The union submitted that Thompson had nearly 20 years seniority, complied with other COVID-19 protocols, and had a clean record, arguing compensation was appropriate over reinstatement.
Natalie Arnsby, LHSC's manager of employee and labour relations, testified those factors would not have been considered, conceding that once Thompson said she wouldn't get vaccinated, her termination followed automatically.
In his decision, Wright said while LHSC had cause for discipline, the termination was excessive as Thompson was not provided progressive discipline, and should have been placed on a 30-day suspension instead.
Termination deprived Thompson of the chance to reflect on the consequences of her decision while on unpaid leave, he writes, acknowledging Thompson likely knew she could be fired.
Wright gave no damages for lost wages, saying Thompson saw no economic loss for which LHSC could be held responsible.
The policy, which the union conceded was reasonable, is still in effect, Thompson remains unvaccinated, and she gave no sign an initial suspension would have changed her mind, he wrote.
 

COVID-19 Resurgence, What's Up Taiwan – News at 14:00, June 12, 2024 | TaiwanPlus News​

 

Health officials monitoring new strain of COVID-19​


 

86 LA city employees terminated for not complying with COVID mandate​


 

Bay Area wastewater links to possible COVID surge​


 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top