Assault Rifle
Registered Member
Your own DG ISPR amdiited we used to air to ground missiles to strike nur khan, murid and rafiqui.
Evidence : IAF Rafale Jet Shot Down
- Thread starter CombatCorner
- Start date
Assault Rifle
Registered Member
Here is the video of ISPR DG confirming we used fighter jets with air to surface missiles in the attacks on 10th.
There goes the Pak narrative of IAF being grounded into the dustbin.
There goes the Pak narrative of IAF being grounded into the dustbin.
Zarvan
Elite Member
No Indian plane flew. It was all Brahmos from ground and drones which were carrying out strikes.
Assault Rifle
Registered Member
Looks like you did not see above clip of your DG ISPR where he confirmed we launched air to surface missiles from fighters
Yasser76
Elite Member
Nope, they stated missiles, can you show me where they said air to ground?
Assault Rifle
Registered Member
"Usne apne tayyaron se fizai se zameen missile dage hain."
Corax
Registered Member
You would have to be a retard to believe this cow shit (no pun intended). First of all, if you're getting this from the same media that claimed "Lahore port had been captured or destroyed", we can dismiss it straight away. Second, how do you or anyone else know what the RoE of the IAF was that night? Third, if the IAF was only tasked with attacking civilian sites like mosques, and not military assets and not to fight the PAF, why did it need over 70 aircraft, including fighter sweeps and A2A configured fighters? Fourth, those civilian sites that were attacked could have easily been targeted with Brahmos strikes, given that they were not military, and had no defensive capability such as soft and hard kill defences. You're making up BS to cover up your failures. The IAF clearly sent a large package with the intention of "avenging" Feb 2019, and claiming at least some victory with an A2A kill. Sadly for the likes you and your hindutva/rss brethren that didn't work out too well. Maybe next time when you have "LCA tejus or Su57 the result might have been different".First of all there is no evidence of three Rafales down.
Most likely one in Bhatinda and that's it.
It has got to with the RoE followed by IAF that day.
RoE had been not to target any Pakistani military assets. So IAF was focus on nine terrorist sites and surely they were targeted with pin point accuracy.
That's why no BVRs or S-400 were launched though PAF was loitering very close to the border on May7. IAF wasn't playing with PAF that day.
On May 10 IAF sent SCAlps and Brahmos to every Pakistani airbase in tandem to give sample of things to come. We have more than 1000 Brahmos and SCALP, only 15 were used that day. And I'm talking about things verified through Sat Pictures.
According India media report several PAF assets were destroyed.
Four air-launched missile strikes by IAF on May 10 and Pakistan was on the mat
India used one SCALP and one Brahmos missile in tandem to hit high-value targets in Pakistan so that no target was missed. | India Newswww.hindustantimes.com
Boss
Registered Member
The SAT images don’t prove anything. Nobody is denying that the airfields were not attacked. Hitting a runway is not destroying an airfield. There are SOP’s in place to repairs runways in a couple of hours, secondly, during during a war your assets are not in your main bases, they are scattered all over. Let go to the specifics now. The much touted destruction of Rahim Yar Khan base is BS as it is not an active base. It was built by UAE and it is primarily used by its Royal Family for their hunting trips to Pakistan. The attack damaged the Royal terminal there. The attack on Bholari did damage an AWAC, which is repairable. This has been accepted by Pakistan. There was no damage of any other core assets. It’s is difficult to hide a damaged hanger or a runway but easy to clean up after a destroyed S400 or Brahmos storage area. Anyways the Sat picture that you refer to are from NYT. If you accept these sat pictures please also accept sat pictures of atleast 3 crash sites in Kashmir and on ground evidence from many crash sites especially from Bhatinda.
Baibers_1260
Trusted Member
Where are the Pakistani planes shot down over India?
Like the way Christine dismisses AVM Bharti's claims as Bakwas.
@Vox Non Dei @Assault Rifle @Brahmos @onlinpunit @Vikramaditya1
TAC
Registered Member
Well done indeed, mighty superpower IAF was still able to fly after the merciless and humiliating beating it got a couple of days earlier, losing its most prized and latest assets. Someone get the IAF Chief some medals for that, proud achievement indeed
as the saying goes, a drowning man even grabs hold of a straw and such is the current state of Indians desperately trying to cope. ‘O look at my satellite photo showing a runway damaged’
’We were still flying after you beat the crap out of us, honest, look I can prove it’
‘It wasn’t fighters you shot down, it was clever decoys err… with ejection seats and pilots and err… they looked exactly like our jets too’ 
’s‘air warfare is out of date now and irrelevant err let’s talk about BrahMos and misiles instead’’ look we got casing of a PL-15, we can now reverse engineer it’’smaking themselves look even more pathetic.
Last edited:
SiliconBit (silicon0000)
Trusted Member
Here's another feather in the cap for your 'cow cola' claims, to really boost its supposed effects: The Indian forces' biggest triumph was supposedly identifying and capturing seaports in Lahore, Faisalabad etc. This top-secret information is hidden from the whole world. This 'seaport' intelligence was so classified, so top-secret, that even the locals were clueless. Yet, the Indian forces not only uncovered these 'seaports' but also captured them and took them away!
TAC
Registered Member
Very funny way of ‘dominating’ when no Indian jets crossed over into Pakistani Airspace and IAF still managed to get 6 of its jets shot down including its much hyped Ra-fail.
TopGun786
Trusted Member
At least 2 Rafale shot. Proofs are emerging.
And pilot from at least one Rafale did not survive. Update your library.
TAC
Registered Member
‘Only four losses of IAF’ including Ra-fail? You must be so proud
especially fighting against a force which is far smaller and has only a fraction of your budget. Well done indeed, tru Supa Powa O and IAF totally dominated on the 10th did they? So how many PAF jets did they down during this ‘totally dominated’?? Err….. none!!!
what you actually mean by ‘totally dominated’ is that they may have managed to fire a few misiles from Indian airspace and scampered back without being shot down tooyou can now be proud of your definition of ‘totally dominated’ as well as your AF
Last edited:
Users who are viewing this thread
Country Watch Latest
-
-
-
-
-
The death of US defense autonomy - 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (5 Viewers)- Latest: Ali_Baba
