You are right, but in this case disengage means giving into Israeli demands which means hezbollah has to go back beyond the litani river. Let’s say hezbollah agrees to this, then Israelis will say we you to disarm and remove all missiles, then it will be one concession after another. So hezbolksh really has no reason to deescalate. Also Israel just revealed their card the exploding pagers / mobile devices and slowly revealing all their cards which they can’t use again or will more difficult to do as their potential adversaries are now aware of these capabilities.Disengage does not mean surrendering. Vietcong disengage after Tet failed, and not until 1972 there are major action for them.
I can't see into the future, what I did is to project stuff from what had already happened. I had already said on the other thread, barking dog don't bite, Israel is doing all kind of barking here, their goal is obvious, daring Hezbollah to attack because they need US and the West to be on their side to do stuff they said they wanted to do.