Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If so why didn't you point out his post was off topic and instead you are trying to help to strengthen his point, but after I answered your question, you are calling my replying post "off the topic"?That refers to a previous post that you were calling true. Please don’t take comments out of context.
If so why didn't you point out his post was off topic and instead you are trying to help to strengthen his point, but after I answered you question, you are calling my replying post "off the topic"?
Do you always type something else, say something else and actually mean something else?lol. I said that discussing all the other countries where this happened as you mentioned would be off topic.
Again, the OP is talking about colonisation of America, which is where the genocide happens. North America is not colonised by 1800s and 1900s.What? Where did you learn your history and math?

wasn't this alone enough being called genocide in just one century?Again, the OP is talking about colonisation of America, which is where the genocide happens. North America is not colonised by 1800s and 1900s.
Between 1800 and 1900, the American Indians lost more than half of their population, and their proportion in the total U.S. population dropped from 10.15% to 0.31%. Throughout the 19th century, while the U.S. population grew by 20-30% every 10 years, the Indian population experienced a precipitous decline.
Wars happened in big country indeed incur big number casualties, but check out the percentage, did the Chinese population all got all killed off in those wars?I am pretty sure Chinese Civil War in 1949 kill more Chinese from both side than the amount of Indian killed by White during the entire period of 1800 - 1950.
There are less than 50,000 killed (with around 375,000 population since 1850) and most of them during war between different Indian tribe.wasn't this alone enough being called genocide in just one century?
Since when genocide means the same people kill the same people, and all war casualties equate genocides?If you want to call that genocide, then you should also call Chinese Civil War genocide.
But then did the Native American population all got all killed off in those wars?Wars happened in big country indeed incur big number casualties, but check out the percentage, did the Chinese population all got all killed off in those wars?
The 1850 Census Enumerator Instructions maintain the same instructions used since the 1790 Census, “Indians not taxed are not to be enumerated in this or any other schedule,” however, in 1860, the instructions for Native Americans start to become more complex. Now, “Indians who have renounced tribal rule, and who under State or Territorial laws exercise the rights of citizens, are to be enumerated,” and were assigned a distinct racial category of “Ind.” Native Americans’ race was determined by their lack of tribal affiliation and U.S. citizenship. Now that Native Americans had been assigned a distinct racial category, their census numbers increase by 3,817%.
Then I assume Rwanda Genocides is not a genocide at all, either that or Hutu and Tutsi that was involved in the genocide are not both Rwandan....Since when genocide means the same people kill the same people, and all war casualties equate genocides?
If they involved on local tribe killing off another tribe entirely, they were also genocides, perfect fit the bill.But then did the Native American population all got all killed off in those wars?
If you look at the population spread, The population of Native Indian actually increased 37000 fold since US gain independence
Native Americans and the Census | History 90.01: Topics in Digital History
journeys.dartmouth.edu
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.