AZADPAKISTAN2009
Elite Member
- Sep 8, 2009
- 39,090
- 41,389
- Country of Origin
- Country of Residence
Lahore Jalza , final Push Zindabad !!!
Student are coming
Student are coming
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It weakens the institution of the army if one general is leader for life, especially in peacetime. Look at the vigor and purpose new leaders come in with, and within a few years the momentum slows down and its is about codifying their rule.I think Army Chief tenure should be for life. It will solve a lot of problems in Pakistan.
After every 3 years, our country is set a part in 2 pieces until the Army chief is given another extension and then everything calms down.
Musharraf was in power for 8 years and stayed COAS and so did Zia and his predecessors. It means if the Army Chief is appointed for life, hopefully the Army’s focus will move beyond seeking another extension and then everyone knows in principle that they will stay for as long as required and the priorities will change.
They're all sold out - doesn't matter who is in power. Just the name/face change. The chief is nominated by PentagonWhy does every PA chief get an extension
Don't you have credible Gernails as core commanders, who could replace Asim Munir
I think Army Chief tenure should be for life. It will solve a lot of problems in Pakistan.
After every 3 years, our country is set a part in 2 pieces until the Army chief is given another extension and then everything calms down.
Musharraf was in power for 8 years and stayed COAS and so did Zia and his predecessors. It means if the Army Chief is appointed for life, hopefully the Army’s focus will move beyond seeking another extension and then everyone knows in principle that they will stay for as long as required and the priorities will change.
How about merging the post of PM and the Chief. !1 year is too short because it expires too quickly. I have a better proposition
The Army Chief extension must be tied with the Prime Ministers tenure. If the government collapses, new Army Chief and new Prime Minister
The people know it means martial law without saying it openly.If any army chief gets 5 years, then democracy will be gone. We all know If any Army Chief gets a five-year term, democracy will be finished. We all know he controls everything. Once he gets five years straight, what's next? He’ll demand 10 years, then 15, then 30 years, like former Egyptian President Mubarak. Take someone like General Asim Munir – trust me, I wouldn't even hire him as a security guard for any of my restaurants; he might kidnap my Clint’s family and associates. He is not fit for the job. He’s far too generous for any community, let alone running a country."
Mr.x …hmm… patwari in disguise…We will have Haseena’s government but it’s okay for few years if it brings stability in the country.
We lack stability and everyone conspires against each other.
Well Helmuth von Moltke served as COAS of the German Army till the age of 88 years. His magnum opus- Sedan- came at 70. I see no harm in Pak COAS serving for life if it provides stability.
Regards
@Joe Shearer
PPP thinks it’s being coy by letting PML-N make the visible moves but the public needs to remember how the PPP being part of the PDM coalition is what has been enabling of the last 2 years of chaos and Bilawal himself admitted on international (American if I remember correctly) media that the VONC was his personal idea.PDM is digging own grave (PPP and PML)
Pakistani will also stand up
Stability without justice will cause the best and brightest to flee, a brain drain, and the country will become a stagnant and permanent low wage country at the mercy of Indian hegemony.I m all for stability whtever it takes
What are you expecting from band of thieves.It is govt duty to reveal the draft and let it discussed in media, public and in parliament.
Now, a 5 year tenure is a possibility as the draft is coming from the army (as in ARY news)