How are people like you so sure about sentiments in Afghanistan? They don't seem to have consensus on anything over there apart from the very fact that they are Afghans, a distinct separate nation.
Beyond a rudimentary generic commentary of usually 2-3 sentences, rest of all your posting history is propaganda against the State for alleged persecution of minorities with Pakistan Army as the ultimate target of critic and ridicule.
I think youâve forgotten a lot of Pakistani history.
I could sit here and write a very long article, bring up dates, governments, military interventions, political engineering, constitutional crises, and all the decisions that have brought Pakistan to where it is today. I could give you reference after reference.
But honestly, I donât think I need to.
For me, three simple verses from the Qurâan say enough.
âIndeed, Allah does not change the condition of a people until they change what is in themselves.â (Qurâan 13:11)
Think about that for a moment.
If a country keeps making the same mistakes, keeps protecting the same people from accountability, keeps weakening its institutions, and keeps expecting a different result, how can anything really change?
Then Allah says:
âAnd do not incline toward those who do wrong, lest the Fire touch youâŠâ (Qurâan 11:113)
To me, this is a serious warning. We shouldnât defend wrongdoing simply because the person doing it belongs to an institution we respect or support.
And then there is this:
âIndeed, Allah commands you to render trusts to whom they are due and, when you judge between people, to judge with justice.â (Qurâan 4:58)
Power is a trust.
Running a country is a trust.
Having authority over peopleâs lives is a trust.
And that trust comes with accountability.
I love Pakistan, and thatâs exactly why I have a problem with the idea that criticizing the people or institutions responsible for major decisions somehow means you are against Pakistan.
It doesnât.
Pakistan is not the same thing as its politicians.
Pakistan is not the same thing as its military.
Pakistan is not the same thing as its intelligence agencies.
Pakistan is its people and the people have every right to ask difficult questions about the institutions that exercise power in their name.
We can argue about individual events and interpretations. We can disagree about who is responsible for what. Thatâs normal.
But we shouldnât rewrite history simply because the truth is uncomfortable.
And we shouldnât call everything we disagree with âpropaganda.â
If someone is wrong, show where they are wrong.
If their facts are incorrect, correct them.
If their interpretation is different, explain why.
Thatâs how an honest discussion works.
Blindly defending any institution, civilian or military, isnât patriotism.
Accountability is not hatred of Pakistan.
Criticism is not betrayal.
And asking those who hold power to answer for their decisions is not anti-state.
Sometimes, if we genuinely love our country, we have to be willing to ask uncomfortable questions about why we are where we are and whether the people entrusted with power have actually fulfilled that trust.
That is not hatred for Pakistan.
That is caring enough about Pakistan to want better.
Messenger of Allah (ï·ș) say:
âWhosoever of you sees an evil, let him change it with his hand; and if he is not able to do so, then [let him change it] with his tongue; and if he is not able to do so, then with his heart â and that is the weakest of faith.â
I would rather follow Quran & Sunnah than Establishment. 
